Abstract
Sober and Wilson have recentlyclaimed that evolutionary theory can do whatneither philosophy nor experimental psychologyhave been able to, namely, ``break the deadlock''in the egoism vs. altruism debate with anargument based on the reliability of altruisticmotivation. I analyze both their reliabilityargument and the experimental evidence ofsocial psychology in favor of altruism in termsof the folk-psychological ``laws'' and inferencepatterns underlying them, and conclude thatthey both rely on the same patterns. I exposethe confusions that have led Sober and Wilsonto defend a reliability argument whilerejecting the experimental evidence of socialpsychology.
References
Batson, D.: 2000, 'Commentary', Journal of Consciousness Studies 7(1-2), 207-210.
Batson, D. and Shaw, L.: 1991, 'Evidence for Altruism: Towards a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives', Psychological Inquiry 2(2), 107-122.
Broad, C.D.: 1930, Five Types of Ethical Theory, Kegan Paul, London.
Butler, J.: 1729, 'Sermons', in L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), British Moralists, Dover, New York.
Duncan-Jones, A.: 1952, Butler's Moral Philosophy, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
Harman G.: 2000, 'Can Evolutionary Theory Provide Evidence against Psychological Hedonism', Journal of Consciousness Studies 7(1-2), 219-221.
Morillo, C.: 1990, 'The Reward Event and Motivation', The Journal of Philosophy 87(4), 169-186.
Ryle, Gilbert: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.
Sidgwick, H.: 1907, the Methods of Ethics, 7th edn., Hackett, Indianapolis/Cambridge.
Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.: 1998, Unto Others. The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Williams, Bernard: 1973, 'Egoism and Altruism', in Problems of the Self, C.U.P., Cambridge, pp. 250-265.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosas, A. Psychological and Evolutionary Evidence for Altruism. Biology & Philosophy 17, 93–107 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012967912103
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012967912103