References
Adams, E.: 1959, ‘The Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics and the Derivation of Its Laws from Those of Particle Mechanics’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.), The Axiomatic Method. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 250–265.
Balzer, W.: 1982, Empirische Theorien: Modelle-Strukturen-Beispiele, Vieweg, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden.
Balzer, W. and J. D. Sneed: 1977, 1978, ‘Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories I, II’, Studia Logica 36, 37, 195–211, 167–194.
Eberle, R. A.: 1971, ‘Replacing one Theory by Another under Preservation of a Given Feature’, Philosophy of Science 38, 486–501.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1962, ‘Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 28–97.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1963, ‘How to Be a Good Empiricist — A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological’, in B. Baumrin (ed.), Philosophy of Science, The Delaware Seminar, Vol. 2 (1962–1963), Interscience Publishers, New York, London, Sidney, pp. 3–39.
Gärdenfors, P.: 1987, Rational Changes of Belief, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Glymour, C.: 1970, ‘On Some Patterns of Reduction’, Philosophy of Science 37, 340–353.
Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, Free Press, New York, London.
Hoering, W.: 1984, ‘Anomalies of Reduction’, in W. Balzer, D. Pearce and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.), Reduction in Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, pp. 33–50.
Kamlah, A.: 1985, ‘On Reduction of Theories’, Erkenntnis 22, 119–142.
Kemeny, J. G. and P. Oppenheim: 1956, ‘On Reduction’, Philosophical Studies 7, 6–19.
Makinson, D.: 1985, ‘How to Give It Up: A Survey of Some Formal Aspects of the Logic of Theory Change’, Synthese 62, 347–363.
Mayr, D.: 1976, ‘Investigations of the Concept of Reduction I’, Erkenntnis 10, 275–294.
Mormann, T.: 1984, ‘Strukturalistische Reduktionsbeziehungen als Morphismen von Constraintkategorien’, mimeo, Bielefeld.
Nagel, E.: 1949, ‘The Meaning of Reduction in Natural Sciences’, in R. C. Stauffer (ed.), Science and Civilization, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 99–145.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1980: ‘The Growth of Theories: Comments on the Structuralist Approach’, in J. Hintikka, D. Gruender and E. Agazzi (eds.), Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo's Methodology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–47.
Pearce, D.: 1981, ‘Is There Any Justification for a Nonstatement View of Theories?’, Synthese 46, 1–39.
Pearce, D.: 1982, ‘Logical Properties of the Structuralist Concept of Reduction’, Erkenntnis 18, 307–333.
Pearce, D. and V. Rantala: 1983, ‘New Foundations for Metascience’, Synthese 56, 1–26.
Pearce, D. and V. Rantala: 1984, ‘Limiting Case Correspondence between Physical Theories’, in W. Balzer, D. Pearce and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.), Reduction in Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, pp. 153–185.
Sneed, J. D.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Sneed, J. D.: 1976, ‘Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science: A Formal Approach’, Erkenntnis 10, 115–146.
Stegmüller, W.: 1973, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band II, Theorie und Erfahrung, 2. Halbband, Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. (English 1976, as The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin).
Stegmüller, W.: 1979, The Structuralist View of Theories, A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Tuomela, R.: 1978, ‘On the Structuralist Approach to the Dynamics of Theories’. Synthese 39, 211–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I wish to thank David Pearce for enlightening criticism and Winfred Klink for correcting my English.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rott, H. Reduction: Some criteria and criticisms of the structuralist concept. Erkenntnis 27, 231–256 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175370
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175370