Abstract
Feminist science studies and the sociology of scientific knowledge have emerged within the past twenty years as explicit challenges to the epistemological individualism that still predominates within most philosophy of science. The “Strong Programme” for the sociology of scientific knowledge was put forward first, to provide distinctively sociological explanations for the diversity of human beliefs about the natural world.1 Whereas earlier programs in the sociology of knowledge had exempted the natural sciences and mathematics from their purview, and the dominant Mertonian approaches to the sociology of science had confined their studies to scientific institutions, motivations, and organizational norms, the new sociologists proposed to explain the content of scientific knowledge in the same way that they would explain any other systems of beliefs and practices. To do otherwise, they often argued, would invoke a scientifically unjustifiable a-priori decision to exempt the sciences from empirical sociological investigation. Indeed, they called for a methodological commitment to some form of epistemological relativism to prevent centuries of cultural admiration for and epistemic deference to science from prejudicing sociological inquiry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcoff, Linda, and Elizabeth Potter, eds: 1993,Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
Addelson, Kathryn Pyne: 1993, ‘Knowers/Doers and their Moral Problems’, in Alcoff and Potter, 1993: 265–94.
Alcoff, Linda, and Elizabeth Potter: 1991, ‘Making Knowledge’, in Ellen Messer-Davidow and Joan Hartman, eds,Engendering Knowledge: Feminists in Academe. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 259–77.
Ashmore, Malcolm: 1989,The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baier, Annette: 1987, ‘The Need for More Than Justice’, in Marsha Hanen and Kai Nielsen, eds,Science, Morality and Feminist Theory. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Barnes, Barry, and David Bloor: 1982, ‘Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge’, in Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes, eds,Rationality and Relativism. Cambridge: MIT Press, 21–47.
Belenky, Mary, Blythe Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, and Jill Tarule: 1986,Women’s Ways of Knowing. New York: Basic Books.
Birke, Lynda: 1986,Women, Feminism, and Biology. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
Bleier, Ruth: 1984,Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and its Theories on Women. New York: Pergamon Press.
Bloor, David: 1983,Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bloor, David: 1991,Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butler, Judith: 1990,Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
Butler, Judith: 1995, ‘Contingent Foundations’, in Linda Nicholson, ed.,Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York: Routledge, 35–57.
Clifford, James, and George Marcus: 1986,Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Code, Lorraine: 1991,What Can She Know? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Collins, Harry: 1992,Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, Harry and Steven Yearley: 1992a, ‘Epistemological Chicken’, in Pickering, 1992: 301–26.
Collins, Harry: 1992b, ‘Journey into Space’, in Pickering, 1992: 369–89.
Blythe Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, and Jill Tarule
Elgin, Catherine: 1993, ‘Understanding in Art and Science’,Synthese, 95, 13–28.
Fausto-Sterling, Anne: 1985,Myths of Gender. New York: Basic Books.
Fraser, Nancy, and Linda Nicholson: 1990, ‘Social Criticism Without Philosophy: An Encounter Between Feminism and Postmodernism’, in Linda Nicholson, ed.,Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge: 19–38.
Haraway, Donna: 1989,Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna: 1991,Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna: 1992a, ‘Otherworldly Conversations; Terran Topics; Local Terms’,Science as Culture, 3, 64–98.
Haraway, Donna: 1992b, ‘The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d others’, in Grossberg, Nelson, and Treichler, eds,Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge: 295–337.
Harding, Sandra: 1986,The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Harding, Sandra: 1991,Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Harding, Sandra: 1992, ‘After the Neutrality Ideal’,Social Research, 59, 567–88.
Hartsock, Nancy: 1984,Money, Sex and Power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Hubbard, Ruth: 1990,The Politics of Women’s Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Keller, Evelyn Fox: 1983,A Feeling for the Organism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Keller, Evelyn Fox: 1985,Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Keller, Evelyn Fox: 1992,Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science. New York: Routledge.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin: 1981,The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructive and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Michael Mulkay: 1983,Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.
Latour, Bruno: 1987,Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno: 1988, ‘The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative’, in Knowledge and Refiexivity, ed. Steve Woolgar. Beverly Hills: Sage: 155–76.
Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar: 1986,Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Longino, Helen: 1990,Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Longino, Helen: 1992, ‘Essential Tensions — Phase Two: Feminist, Philosophical, and Social Studies of Science’. In McMullin, 1992: 198–216.
Longino, Helen: 1993, ‘Subjects, Power, and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies ofScience’, in Alcoff and Potter, 1993: 101–120.
MacKenzie, Donald, and Barry Barnes: 1979, ‘Scientific Judgment: the Biometry-Mendelism Controversy’, in Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, ed. Barry Barnes and Steven Shapin. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Marcus, George, and Michael Fischer: 1986,Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McMullin, Ernan, ed.: 1992,The Social Dimensions of Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson: 1990,Who Knows?: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson: 1993, ‘Epistemological Communities’, in Alcoff and Potter, 1993: 121–60.
Pickering, Andrew: 1984,Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, Andrew: 1992,Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, Andrew: 1995,The Mangle of Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pinch, Trevor: 1986,Confronting Nature. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Potter, Elizabeth: forthcoming, ‘Making Gender/Making Science’, in Bonnie Spanier, ed.,Making a Difference: Feminist Critiques in the Natural Sciences. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Proctor, Robert: 1991,Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rosaldo, Renato: 1989,Culture and Truth. Boston: Beacon Press.
Rouse, Joseph: 1987,Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca: CornellUniversity Press.
Rouse, Joseph: 1991, ‘Policing Knowledge: Disembodied Policy for Embodied Knowledge’,Inquiry, 34, 353–64.
Rouse, Joseph: 1996,Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Shapin, Steven: 1982, ‘History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions’,History of Science, 20, 157–211.
Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer: 1985,Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Traweek, Sharon: 1992, ‘Border Crossings: Narrative Strategies in Science Studies and Among Physicists in Tsukuba Science City, Japan’, in Pickering, 1992: 429–465.
Williams, Michael: 1991,Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Woolgar, Steve: 1988,Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock.
Wylie, Alison: 1991, ‘Gender Theory and the Archaeological Record: Why Is There No Archaeology of Gender?’, in Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, ed. Joan M. Gero and Margaret W. Conkey. Cambridge: Blackwell: 31–54.
Wylie, Alison: 1992, ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’,American Antiquity, 57, 15–35.
Wylie, Alison: forthcoming, ‘The Constitution of Archaeological Evidence: Gender Politics and Science’, in Peter Galison and David Stump, eds,The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rouse, J. (1996). Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. In: Nelson, L.H., Nelson, J. (eds) Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library, vol 256. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4611-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1742-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive