Abstract
Community ecology entered the 1970s with the belief that niche theory would supply a general theory of community structure. The lack of wide-spread empirical support for niche theory led to a focus on models specific to classes of communities such as lakes, intertidal communities, and forests. Today, the needs of conservation biology for metrics of “ecological health” that can be applied across types of communities prompts a renewed interest in the possibility of general theory for community ecology. Disputes about the existence of general patterns in community structure trace at least to the 1920s and continue today almost unchanged in concept, although now expressed through mathematical modeling. Yet, a new framework emerged in the 1980s from findings that community composition and structure depend as much on the processes that bring species to the boundaries of a community as by processes internal to a community, such as species interactions and co-evolution. This perspective, termed “supply-side ecology”, argued that community ecology was to be viewed as an “organic earth science” more than as a biological science. The absence of a general theory of the earth would then imply a corresponding absence of any general theory for the communities on the earth, and imply that the logical structure of theoretical community ecology would consist of an atlas of models special to place and geologic time. Nonetheless, a general theory of community ecology is possible similar in form to the general theory for evolution if the processes that bring species to the boundary of a community are analogized to mutation, and the processes that act on the species that arrive at a community are analogized to selection. All communities then share some version of this common narrative, permitting general theorems to be developed pertaining to all ecological communities. Still, the desirability of a general theory of community ecology is debatable because the existence of a general theory suppresses diversity of thought even as it allows generalizations to be derived. The pros and cons of a general theory need further discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Board of Life Sciences (2008) The Role of Theory in Advancing twenty-first Century Biology: Catalyzing Transformative Research. (Report of the Committee on Defining and Advancing the Conceptual Basis of Biological Sciences in the twenty-first Century.) National Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academies Press, pp 208
Brown J (1975) Geographical ecology of desert rodents. In: Cody M, Diamond J (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 315–341
Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789. doi:10.1890/03-9000
Carpenter S, Kitchell J, Hodgson J (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35:634–639. doi:10.2307/1309989
Clements FE (1916) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24:252–284. doi:10.2307/2256278
Cohen J (1978) Food webs and niche space. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Connolly S, Menge BA, Roughgarden J (2001) A latitudinal gradient in recruitment of intertidal invertebrates in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Ecology 82:1799–1813
Diamond J (1973) Distributional ecology of New Guinea birds. Science 179:759–769
Gaines S, Roughgarden J (1985) Larval settlement rate: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3707–3711
Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:1–20. doi:10.2307/2479932
Harte J, Kinzig A, Green J (1999) Self-similarity in the abundance and distribution of species. Science 284:334–336. doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.334
Hubbell S (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159. doi:10.1086/282070
Lawton J (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192
MacArthur RH (1984) Geographical ecology, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
MacArthur RH, Connell JH (1967) The biology of populations. John Wiley, New York
MacArthur RH, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–385. doi:10.1086/282505
MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1963) An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evol Int J Org Evol 17:373–387. doi:10.2307/2407089
May R (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Odum E (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270. doi:10.1126/science.164.3877.262
Pacala S, Roughgarden J (1985) Population experiments with the Anolis lizards of St. Maarten and St. Eustatius. Ecology 66:128–141
Pacala S, Silander J (1985) Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. I. Single-species models of annuals. Am Nat 125:385–411. doi:10.1086/284349
Preston F (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43(185–215):410–432. doi:10.2307/1931976
Rosenfeld L, Anderson T, Hatcher G,et al. (1995) Upwelling fronts and barnacle recruitment in central California. Technical Report 95–19, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA
Roughgarden J (1972) Evolution of niche width. Amer Natur 106:683–718
Roughgarden J (1976) Resource partitioning among competing species: a coevolutionary approach. Theor Popul Biol 9:388–424. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90054-X
Roughgarden J (1990) Origin of the Eastern Caribbean: Data from reptiles and amphibians. In: Larue DK and Draper G (eds) Trans. 12th Caribbean Geological Conference, St. Croix, USVI, Miami Geological Survey, pp 10–26
Roughgarden J (1995) Anolis Lizards of the Caribbean: ecology, evolution, and plate tectonics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 200
Roughgarden J (1998) Production functions from ecological populations: a survey with emphasis on spatially explicit models. In: Tilman D, Kareiva P (eds) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 296–317
Roughgarden J (2007) Challenging Darwin’s theory of sexual selection. Daedalus 136(2):1–14. doi:10.1162/daed.2007.136.2.23
Roughgarden J (2009) The genial gene: deconstructing Darwinian selfishness. University of California Press, Berkeley
Roughgarden J, Iwasa Y (1986) Dynamics of a metapopulation with space-limited subpopulations. Theor Popul Biol 29:235–261. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(86)90010-9
Roughgarden J, Iwasa Y, Baxter C (1985) Demographic theory for an open marine population with space-limited recruitment. Ecology 66:54–67
Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Pacala S (1987) Supply side ecology: The role of physical transport processes. In: Gee JHR and Giller PS (eds) Organization of Communities, Past and Present, The 27th Symposium of the the British Ecological Society, Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp 491–518
Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Possingham H (1988) Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 241:1460–1466
Roughgarden J, Pennington J, Stoner D, Alexander S, Miller K (1991) Collisions of upwelling fronts with the intertidal zone: the cause of recruitment pulses in barnacle populations of central California. Acta Oecologica 12:35–51
Schoener T (1982) The controversy over interspecific competition. Amer Sci 70:586–595
Schoener T (1984) Strong. In: Simberloff DRD, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 254–281
Shkedy Y, Roughgarden J (1997) Barnacle recruitment and population dynamics predicted from coastal upwelling. Oikos 80(3):487–498
Simberloff D (2004) Community ecology: is it time to move on? Am Nat 163:787–799
Smale S (1976) On the differential equations of species in competition. J Math Biol 3:5–7. doi:10.1007/BF00307854
Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Woodward J (2001) Law and explanation in biology: invariance is the kind of stability that matters. Philos Sci 68:1–20. doi:10.1086/392863
Woodward J (2002) There is no such thing as a ceteris paribus law. Erkenntnis 57:303–328
Woodward J (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roughgarden, J. Is there a general theory of community ecology?. Biol Philos 24, 521–529 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9164-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9164-z