Abstract
Artefacts are usually understood in contrast with natural kinds and conceived as a unitary kind. Here we propose that there is in fact a variety of artefacts: from the more concrete to the more abstract ones. Moreover, not every artefact is able to fulfil its function thanks to its physical properties: Some artefacts, particularly what we call “institutional” artefacts, are symbolic in nature and require a system of rules to exist and to fulfil their function. Adopting a standard method to measure conceptual representation (the property generation task), we have experimentally explored how humans conceptualise these different kinds of artefacts. Results indicate that institutional artefacts are typically opposed to social objects, while being more similar to standard artefacts, be they abstract or concrete.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, L.R. 2004. The ontology of artifacts. Philosophical Explorations 7(2): 99–111.
Barsalou, L.W., and K. Wiemer-Hastings. 2005. Situating abstract concepts. In Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought, ed. D. Pecher and R. Zwaan, 129–163. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barsalou, L.W., A. Santos, K.W. Simmons, and C.D. Wilson. 2008. Language and simulations in conceptual processing. In Symbols, embodiment and meaning, ed. M. De Vega, A.M. Glenberg, and A.C. Graesser, 245–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, P. 1996. Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 60: 1–29.
Bloom, P. 2007. More than words: a reply to Malt and Sloman. Cognition 105: 649–655.
Borghi, A.M. In press. Embodied cognition and word acquisition: The challenge of abstract words. In Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (HSK) 38/2, ed. C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, and S. Tessendorf. Berlin: De Gruyter: Mouton.
Borghi, A.M., and N. Caramelli. 2003. Situation bounded conceptual organization in children: from action to spatial relations. Cognitive Development 18: 40–60.
Borghi, A.M., and F. Cimatti. 2009. Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings. In Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society, ed. N. Taatgen and H. van Rijn, 2304–2309. Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.
Borghi, A.M., and D. Pecher. 2011. Introduction to the special topic Embodied and Grounded Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 187. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00187.
Chaigneau, S.E., L.W. Barsalou, and S. Sloman. 2004. Assessing the causal structure of function. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 133(4): 601–625.
Dipert, R. 1993. Artifacts, art works, and agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Dubreil, B. 2010. Human evolution and the origins of hierarchies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Estes, Z., S. Golonka, and L.L. Jones. 2011. Thematic thinking: the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory 54: 249–294.
Gainotti, G. 2000. What the locus of brain lesion tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: a review. Cortex 36(4): 539–559.
Galantucci, B., and N. Sebanz. 2009. Joint action: current perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 255–259.
Gelman, S.A. 2009. Learning from others: children’s construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology 60: 115–140.
Gilbert, M. 1989. On social facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greenacre, M., and J. Blasius (eds.). 1994. Correspondence analysis in the social sciences. Recent developments and applications. London: Academic.
Hair, J.R., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black. 1992. Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
Hilpinen, R. 1993. Authors and artifacts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 155–178.
Houkes, W., and P.E. Vermaas. 2010. Technical functions: On the use ad design of artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kalénine, S., C. Peyrin, C. Pichat, C. Segebarth, F. Bonthoux, and M. Baciu. 2009. The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: a behavioral and fMRI study. NeuroImage 44: 1152–1162.
Keil, F.C. 1989. Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lagerspetz, E. 1995. The opposite mirrors. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Laurence, E., and S. Margolis (eds.). 2007. Creations of the minds. Theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacCormick, N. 2007. Institutions of law. An essay in legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malt, B.C., and S.A. Sloman. 2007. Category essence or essentially pragmatic? Creator’s intention in naming and what’s really what. Cognition 105: 615–648.
Martin, A. 2007. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58(1): 25–45.
Medin, D.L., and A. Ortony. 1988. Psychological essentialism. In Similarity and analogical reasoning, ed. S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Medin, D.L., E.B. Lynch, J.D. Coley, and S. Atran. 1997. Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology 32: 49–96.
Millikan, R.G. 1984. Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Millikan, R.G. 1999. Wings, spoons, pills, and quills: a pluralist theory of function. The Journal of Philosophy 96: 191–206.
Pecher, D., I. Boot, and S. van Dantzig. 2011. Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. In The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 54, ed. B. Ross, 217–248. Burlington: Academic.
Petroski, H. 1993. The evolution of useful things. New York: A. A. Knopf, Inc.
Rea, M.C. (ed.). 1997. Material constitution: A reader. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Santos, A., S.E. Chaigneau, W.K. Simmons, and L.W. Barsalou. 2011. Property generation reflects word association and situated simulation. Language and Cognition 3–1: 83–119. doi:10.1515/LANGCOG.2011.004.
Scorolli, C., P. Jacquet, F. Binkofski, R. Nicoletti, A. Tessari, and A.M. Borghi. 2012. Abstract and concrete phrases processing differently modulates cortico-spinal excitability. Brain Research 1488: 60–71. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.004.
Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
Searle, J.R. 2010. Making the social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Semin, G.R., and E.R. Smith (eds.). 2008. Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomasson, A. 1999. Fiction and metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomasson, A. 2003. Realism and human kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67(3): 580–609.
Tummolini, L., and C. Castelfranchi. 2006. The cognitive and behavioral mediation of institutions: toward an account of institutional actions. Cognitive Systems Research 7(2–3): 307–323.
Tuomela, R. 1995. The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tuomela, R. 2002. The philosophy of social practices: A collective acceptance view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, K.L. 1990. Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wu, L.L., and L.W. Barsalou. 2009. Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica 132: 173–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roversi, C., Borghi, A.M. & Tummolini, L. A Marriage is an Artefact and not a Walk that We Take Together: An Experimental Study on the Categorization of Artefacts. Rev.Phil.Psych. 4, 527–542 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0150-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0150-7