Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T18:28:23.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems with Autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

The article first develops an account of autonomy, explaining individual autonomy by means of three normative components and then discussing two objections. The first objection claims that autonomy has to be thought of as essentially relational; this objection is refuted. The second objection, labeled the skeptical objection, claims that we simply do not live autonomously, nor could we ever. Reference is made to novels by Iris Murdoch to present a skeptical solution to this objection.

Type
Highlights from the 9th Symposium of the International Association of Women Philosophers, October 2000, Zurich, Switzerland
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Benson, Paul. 1991. Autonomy and oppressive socialization. Social Theory and Practice 17(3): 385–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Paul. 1994. Free agency and self‐worth. Journal of Philosophy 91(12): 650–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1979. Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bove, Cheryl. 1992. New directions: Iris Murdoch's latest women. In Critical essays on Iris Murdoch, ed. Tucker, Lindsey. New York: MacMilllan.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1992. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Judith, Butler, and Scott, Joan. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byatt, Antonia S. 1965. Degrees of freedom: The novels of Iris Murdoch. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1990. Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 1991. Autonomy and personal history. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21(1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, John. 1989a. Introduction. In The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy, ed. Christman, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
John, Christman. ed. 1989b. The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 1999. Questioning autonomy: The feminist challenge and the challenge for feminism. In Questioning ethics: Contemporary debates in philosophy, ed. Richard, Kearney, and Dooley, Michael. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, Christine. 1994. Trouble with autonomy. Some feminist considerations. In Feminism: Schools of thought in politics series, Vol. 1. ed. Okin, Susan Moller and Mansbridge, Jean. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. 1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. 1989. The concept of autonomy. In The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy, ed. Christman, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro. 1994. Authenticity and the project of modernity. European Journal of Philosophy 2(3): 241–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1988. Identification and wholeheartedness. In The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1989. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy, ed. Christman, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marylin. 1997. Autonomy and social relationships: Rethinking the feminist critique. In Feminists rethink the self, ed. Meyers, Diana Tietjens. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marylin. 1999. The social self and the partiality debates. In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Gray, Tim. 1990. Freedom. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago, London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1992. Kampf um Anerkennung. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1956a. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In Kant‐Werkausgabe, ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm. Bd. VII. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1956b. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. In Kant‐Werkausgabe, ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm. Bd. VII. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Keller, Jean. 1997. Autonomy, relationality, and feminist ethics. Hypatia 12(2): 152164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva F. 1997. Human dependency and Rawlsian equality. In Feminists rethink the self, ed. Meyers, Diana Tietjens. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1982. La philosophie et I'idee d'infini. In En decouvrant l'existence avec Husserl et Heidegger, ed. Levinas, Emmanuel. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. 2000a. Introduction: Autonomy refigured. In Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self, ed. Catriona, Mackenzie, and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Catriona, Mackenzie and Stoljar, Natalie. eds. 2000b. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. 2000. Imagining oneself otherwise. In Relational autonomy, feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self, ed. Catriona, Mackenzie, and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meehan, Johanna. 1995. Autonomy, recognition, and respect: Habermas, Benjamin, and Honneth. In Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse, ed. Meehan, Johanna. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1995. Autonomous agents: From self‐control to autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens ed., 1997. Feminists rethink the self. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens ed., 1987. The socialized individual and individual autonomy: An intersection between philosophy and psychology. In Women and moral theory, ed. Kittay, Eva Feder, and Meyers, Diana Tietjens. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1960. Under the net. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1962. The flight from the enchanter. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1973. An accidental man. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1976. A word child. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1981. Nuns and soldiers. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1983. The philosopher's pupil. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1993. The green knight. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1997a. Against dryness. In Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature, ed. Conradi, Peter. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1997b. The darkness of practical reason. In Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature, ed. Conradi, Peter. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1997c. The sovereignty of good over other concepts. In Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature, ed. Conradi, Peter. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1997d. The sublime and the beautiful revisited. In Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature, ed. Conradi, Peter. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1997e. Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature, ed. Conradi, Peter. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. In Law and the community: The end of individualism? ed. Hutchinson, Allan C., and Lesley, J. M. Green. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. Love's knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony, solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rössler, Beate. 1998. The ache beneath the smile: Literarische Texte und philosophische Imagination. In Interpretation und Wahrheit, ed. Emil, Angehrn, and Baertschi, Bernard. studia philosophica 57/1998. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
Rössler, Beate. 2001. Der Wert des Privaten. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp (English translation forthcoming with Polity Press).Google Scholar
Slaymaker, William. 1992. Myths, mystery and the mechanism of determinism: The aesthetics of freedom in Iris Murdoch's fiction. In Critical essays on Iris Murdoch, ed. Tucker, Lindsey. New York: MacMilllan.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1976. Responsibility for self. In The identities of persons, ed. Rorty, Amelie Oksenberg. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1979. Selbstbewusstsein und Selbstbestimmung: Sprachanalytische Interpretationen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gary, Watson ed., 1982. Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, Allison. 1996. Sacrificial logics: Feminist theory and the critique of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar