Skip to main content
Log in

A farewell to functionalism

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Baker, Lynne Rudder: 1982a, ‘De re belief in action’, The Philosophical Review 91, pp: 363–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1982b, ‘Underprivileged access’, Nous 16, pp. 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1985 (forthcoming), ‘Just what do we have in mind?’, in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10, Peter A. French, et al. (eds.) (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul M.: 1979, Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1984, Matter and Consciousness, (Bradford/MIT, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1980, ‘Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1981, ‘Tom Swift and his procedural grandmother’, in Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science (Bradford/MIT, Cambridge, MA), pp. 204–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • —:1982, ‘Cognitive science and the twin-earth problem’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23, pp. 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • —:1984, ‘Observation reconsidered’, Philosophy of Science 51, pp. 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, Jay L.: 1983, ‘Prepositional attitudes and the ontology of the mental’, Cognition and Brian Theory 6, pp. 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Patricia: 1984, ‘Narrow taxonomy and wide functionalism’, Philosophy of Science.

  • Lycan, William G.: 1981, ‘Toward a Homuncular Theory of Believing’, Cognition and Brain Theory 4, pp. 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • -: 1984a, ‘Semantics and methodological solipsism’, read at the Davidson Conference at Rutgers University.

  • —: 1984b, Logical Form in Natural Language, (Bradford/MIT, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Katherine J.: 1984, ‘In defense of methodological solipsism: A reply to Noonan’, Philosophical Studies 45, pp. 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, H. W.: 1981, ‘Methodological solipsism’, Philosophical Studies 40, pp. 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, Joseph: 1983, ‘Functionalism and propositional attitudes’, Nous 17, pp. 529–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, John: 1979, ‘The problem of the essential indexical’, Nous 13, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: 1975, ‘The meaning of “Meaning”’, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 215–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, Georges: 1980, ‘The formal and the opaque’ (Commentary on Fodor's ‘Methodological Solipsism’), Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen P.: 1983, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief (Bradford/MIT, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gulick, Robert: 1982, ‘Mental representation — A functionalist view’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, Terry: 1972, ‘Understanding natural language’, Cognitive Psychology 1, pp. 1–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, L.R. A farewell to functionalism. Philos Stud 48, 1–13 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372403

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372403

Navigation