Abstract
Dialogical ethics are a procedural alternative to substantive ethics such as consequentialism, deontology, principlism, casuistry, virtue ethics and care ethics. Dialogical ethics are procedural in that they do not establish goods in advance, unlike substantive ethics, but rather determine goods through a procedure enacted by the actual parties involved (although some substantive notion of justice may still be required); and they are dialogical in that the procedure is that of dialogue, involving both empathic critical discussion and negotiation. A fundamental tenet of dialogical ethics may be the use of appropriate rules of order regulating dialogue among the parties involved. Some of the central characteristics of such rules of order are that they are reciprocally regulated by dialogue, that they override other ethical considerations, and that they institute empathic critical discussion and negotiation within the ethical dialogue. Dialogical bioethics are the application of dialogical ethics to ethical problems in medicine. The approach of dialogical bioethics has proven fruitful for resolving bioethical problems such as that of medical futility, where approaches of substantive ethics have reached an impasse. There is room for further study of special challenges within dialogical bioethics, such as the incompetence of some involved parties, conflicts of interests of third parties, and the cost-effectiveness of this ethical approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, B. (1989) Why Diagloue? Journal of Philosophy 86, 5–22.
Aristotle (1976) Nicomachean Ethics (revised by Hugh Tredennick). London: Penguin.
Bell, L.A. (1993) Rethinking Ethics in the Midst of Violence: A Feminist Approach to Freedom. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littelfield.
Buber, M. (1996) I and Thou. New York: Touchstone.
Charles, C., Gafni, A. and Whelan, T. (1997) Shared Decision-making in the Medical Encounter: What does it Mean? (Or it Takes at Least Two to Tango). Social Science and Medicine 44, 681–692.
Charles, C., Gafni, A. and Whelan, T. (1999) Decision-making in the Physician-patient Encounter: Revisiting the Shared Treatment Decision-making Model. Social Science and Medicine 49, 651–661.
Charles, C., Whelan, T. and Gafni, A. (1999) What Do We Mean by Partnership in Making Decisions About Treatment? British Medical Journal 319, 780–782.
Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Halevy, A. and Brody, B.A. (1996) A Multi-institution Collaborative Policy on Medical Futility. Journal of the American Medical Association 276, 517–574.
Helft, P.R., Siegler, M. and Lantos, J. (2000) The Rise and Fall of the Futility Movement. New England Journal of Medicine 343, 293–296.
Koehn, D. (1998) Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge.
Pellegrino, E.D. (2000) Bioethics at Century's Turn: Can Normative Ethics Be Retrieved? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25, 655–675.
Plato (1971) Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Popper, K.R. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Popper K.R. (1972) Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rehg, W. (1994) Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jurgen Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Robert, H.M. (1990) The Scott Foresman Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised. Glenview, IL: Scott Forseman.
Rubin, S. (1988) When Doctors Say No: The Battelground of Medical Futility. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Rudnick, A. (2001) A Meta-ethical Critique of Care Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22, 505–517.
Singer, P. (1993) Practical Ethics, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, D.H. and Pettegrew, L.S. (1986) Mutual Persuasion as a Model for Doctor-patient Communication. Theoretical Medicine 7, 127–146.
Troug, R.D. (1995) Progress in the Futility Debate. Journal of Clinical Ethics 6, 128–132.
Turner L. (1998) An Anthropological Exploration of Contemporary Bioethics: The Varieties of Common Sense. Journal of Medical Ethics 24, 127–133.
Walker, M.U. (1993) Keeping Moral Spaces Open. Hastings Center Report 23, 33–40.
Walton D. (1992) The Place of Emotion in Argument. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rudnick, A. The Ground of Dialogical Bioethics. Health Care Analysis 10, 391–402 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023431310918
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023431310918