Skip to main content
Log in

Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author investigates how the conception of legal validity as a specific mode of existence, adopted by Kelsen in Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (General Theory of Norms), can be reconciled with a conception of the legal system in which conflicts of legal norms remain of logical concern. To this end he makes use of Ludwig Wittgenstein's picture theory of the proposition as set out in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The conclusion is that in order to reconcile the two conceptions, the legal system itself must be conceived of as consisting of three sub-systems, namely, (i) a sub-system of perceptible legal judgments, (ii) a sub-system of valid legal conditions, and (iii) a sub-system of observable social practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alchourrón, Carlos E. and Bulygin, Eugenio, ‘The Expressive Conception of Norms’ in: Hilpinen, Risto (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic. Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1981), pp. 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, Alfred, Language, Truth and Logic (London: Penguin, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack, Susan, Philosophy of Logics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978 (1993)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. W., ‘Kelsen and Normative Consistency’ in: Richard Tur and William Twining (eds.), Essays on Kelsen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), with a postcript edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967). Transl. by Max Knight of Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd edn. (Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991). Transl. by Michael Hartney of Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Vienna: Manz-Verlag, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Anthony, Wittgenstein (Penguin Press: Harmondsworth, 1973 (1983)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerchove, Michel van de, and Ost, Francois, Legal System between Order and Disorder (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Hans Joachim, and Rüßmann, Helmut, Juristische Begründungslehre. Eine Einführung in Grundprobleme der Rechtswissenschaft (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, Eerik, The OppositeMirrors. An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, Neil, 'The Concept of Law and “The Concept of Law”', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 14(1) (1994): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Ulfrid, ‘Formalisierung und Axiomatisierung von Rechtssätzen’ in: A. Kaufmann and W. Hassemer (eds.), Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart (Heidelberg: C.F. Mülller, 1979), pp. 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, Stanley L., 'Zum Problem der Normenkonflikte', Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie LXVI/4 (1980): 487–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, Stanley L., 'Stellt die “Algemeine Theorie der Normen” einen Bruch in Kelsens Lehre dar?', in: Die Reine Rechtslehre in wissenschaftlicher Diskussion (Vienna: Manz, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, Stanley L., ‘On the Status of the Lex Posterior Derogating Rule’ in: Richard Tur and William Twining (eds.), Essays on Kelsen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, Stanley L., 'An Empowerment Theory of Legal Norms', Ratio Juris 1 (1988): 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, Stanley L., 'Kelsen's Legal Theory: the Final Round', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12(2) (1992): 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, David, Bertrand Russel and the British Tradition in Philosophy (London: Collins-Fontana, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Harper & Row, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Alf, On Law and Justice (London: Stevens, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Alf, Directives and Norms (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiter, DickW.P., Institutional Legal Facts. Legal Powers and their Effects (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Alf, Directives and Norms (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R., The Construction of Social Reality (Harmondsworth: Allan Lane-The Penguin Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiner, Roger A., 'The Acceptance of a Legal System', in: Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), Wittgenstein and Legal Theory (Boulder: Westview Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Robert, ‘Das Problem des “normativen Syllogismus”’ in: Werner Krawietz and Jerzy Wróblewski (eds.), Sprache, Performanz und Ontologie des Rechts (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1993), pp. 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, Ota, Rechtslogik. Versuch einer Anwendung moderner Logik auf das juristische Denken (Vienna–New York: Springer-Verlag, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, Christiane and Weinberger, Ota, Logik, Semantik, Hermeneutik (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, Ota, 'The Logic of Norms Founded on Descriptive Language', Ratio Juris 4(3) (1991): 284–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974 (1993)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright von, Georg Henrik, Norm and Action. Transl. by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiter, D.W. Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence. Law and Philosophy 16, 479–505 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005870615471

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005870615471

Keywords

Navigation