Skip to main content
Log in

Causal mechanisms in political science

Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel (eds.): Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 342pp, $36.99 PB, $99.00 HB

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel. 2015. Process tracing: from metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew, and Alexander L. George. 1997. Process tracing in case study research. In MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, October 17–19.

  • George, Alexander L. 1979. Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. In Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory, and policy, ed. Paul G. Lauren, 43–68. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Johnson, James. 2006. Consequences of positivism: A pragmatist assessment. Comparative Political Studies 39(2): 224–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Daniel. 1991. Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social science. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Daniel. 1993. On the scope and limits of generalizations in the social sciences. Synthese 97(2): 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Daniel. 2011. Causal mechanisms in the social realm. In Causality in the sciences, ed. Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo and Jon Williamson, 273–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, Stathis. 2004. A glimpse of the secret connexion: Harmonizing mechanisms with counterfactuals. Perspectives on Science 12(3): 288–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Julian. 2007. Do we need mechanisms in the social sciences? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37(2): 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Julian. 2009. Causation in the social sciences: Evidence, inference, and purpose. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39(1): 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runhardt, Rosa W. 2014. Evidence for causal mechanisms in social science: Recommendations from Woodward’s manipulability theory of causation. Philosophy of Science.

  • Steel, Daniel. 2004. Social mechanisms and causal inference. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(1): 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, Daniel. 2008. Across the boundaries: Extrapolation in biology and social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal, Eran. 2013. Old and new problems in philosophy of measurement. Philosophy Compass 8(12): 1159–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, James. 2002. What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science 69(S3): S366–S377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, James. 2003. Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa W. Runhardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Runhardt, R.W. Causal mechanisms in political science. Metascience 24, 453–456 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-015-0009-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-015-0009-x

Navigation