Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Between Profit-Seeking and Prosociality: Corporate Social Responsibility as Derridean Supplement

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article revolves around the debate surrounding the lack of a coherent definition for corporate social responsibility (CSR). I make use of Jacques Derrida’s theorizing on contested meaning to argue that CSR’s ambiguity is actually necessary in light of its functional role as a “supplement” to corporate profit-seeking. As a discourse that refuses to conclusively resolve the tension between profit-seeking and prosociality, CSR expresses an important critical perspective which demands that firms act responsibly, while retaining the overall corporate frame of shareholder supremacy. CSR does this by ambivalently affirming both profit-seeking and prosociality, a necessary contradiction. Attempts to reduce CSR’s ambiguity can thus only succeed by undermining its viability as a normative discourse that captures how certain elements of society understand how firms should act. The analysis suggests that greater scholarly attention is needed with regard to the material discursive environments within which discourses such as CSR are deployed. A discursive approach to research could thus benefit future practitioners, who have to act according to fluid standards of responsibility that cannot be authoritatively defined, but which can be better understood than they are at present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaeshi, K. M., & Adi, B. (2007). Reconstructing the corporate social responsibility construct in Utlish. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2003). The practice of stakeholder colonialism: National interest and colonial discourses in the management of indigenous stakeholders. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis (pp. 255–279). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Sayad, A., Christin, R., Champagne, P., Balzacs, G., Wacquant, L., Bourgois, P. & Lenoir, R. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (P. P. Ferguson, Trans.). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 28(5), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J. M., & Williams, C. (2005). Engage, embed, and embellish: Theory vs. practice in the corporate social responsibility movement. Journal of Corporation Law, 31(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1989). Modernism, post-modernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization Studies, 10(4), 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, W. (2000). Human rights and business ethics: Fashioning a new social contract. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1–2), 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore corporate social responsibility? California Management Review, 2, 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R. L. (1966). Business and its environment. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T. (2008). An American perspective on corporate social responsibility and the tenuous relevance of Jacques Derrida. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 74–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Cuesta Gonzalez, M., & Valor Martinez, C. (2004). Fostering corporate responsibility through public initiative: From the EU to the Spanish case. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena (D. B. Allison, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1981). Dissemination (B. Johnson, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1988). Limited inc (S. Weber, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1992). The rhetoric of drugs. In M. Israel, Trans., E. Weber (Ed.), Points (pp. 228–254). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • Donaldson, T. (1983). Constructing a social contract for business. In T. Donaldson & P. Werhane (Eds.), Ethical issues in business (pp. 153–166). Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Towards a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19, 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26(2), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, R., & Walton, C. (1974). Conceptual foundations of business. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. (1987). The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review, 29(3), 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. (2000). The continuing quest for accountable, ethical, and humane corporate capitalism: An enduring challenge for social issues in management in the new millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, pp. 32–33 and 122–126.

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1997). The Great Crash of 1929. New York: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2000). From Kant to Hegel: On Robert Brandom’s pragmatic philosophy of language. European Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), 322–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13–74). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, G. (2008). Re-thinking corporate social responsibility and the role of the firm: On the denial of politics. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 156–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2003). As if business ethics were possible, “Within such limits…”. Organization, 10(2), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2007). Friedman with Derrida. Business and Society Review, 112(4), 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joutsenvirta, M. (2011). Setting boundaries for corporate social responsibility: Firm–NGO relationship as discursive legitimation struggle. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0775-3.

  • Kerlin, M. J. (1998). The end of history, specters of Marx and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(15), 1717–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, Z. (2007). Nike is leading the race…to the bottom. Alternet. Accessed March 9, 2007, from http://www.alternet.org/economy/48982/.

  • Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic CSR. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. J., & Phillips, J. (2008). Embedding CSR values: The global footware industry’s evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R., Qin, F., & Brause, A. (2007). Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61(1), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience, and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance, 1(2), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. (2010). Lobbying: Political spending does not always match CSR values. Financial Times, Oct 1.

  • Nike. (2010). Nike 2007–2009 corporate responsibility report. Accessible at http://www.nikebiz.com/responsibility/.

  • Okoye, A. (2009). Theorizing corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 321–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. (2009). “A necessary supplement”: What the global compact is and is not. Business and Society, 48(4), 511–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. (2010). The limits of corporate responsibility standards. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(3), 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff, J. D. (2008). Derrida and the deconstruction of the concept of corporate social responsibility. Paper presented to Derrida and Business Ethics Conference, University of Leicester, May 2008.

  • Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. S. (2007). Towards a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance. California Management Review, 17(1), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: A case of hegemony and counter-hegemony. In D. S. Santos (Ed.), Law and globalisation from below-towards a cosmopolitan legality (pp. 92–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1976). Translator’s preface. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of grammatology (pp. ix–lxxxvii). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. (2004). The corporate social objective reconsidered. Organization Science, 15(3), 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., Perrini, F., & Pogutz, S. (2004). New tools to foster corporate socially responsible behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M., & Were, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B., Jr., & Chandler, D. (2004). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 99(2), 250–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St. George St., Toronto, ON, M5R3G3, Canada

    Cameron Sabadoz

Authors
  1. Cameron Sabadoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron Sabadoz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabadoz, C. Between Profit-Seeking and Prosociality: Corporate Social Responsibility as Derridean Supplement. J Bus Ethics 104, 77–91 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0890-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0890-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation