Skip to main content
Log in

What About a Reductionist Approach? Comments on Terry Horgan

  • Original article
  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his work, Horgan argues for the compatibilism of agency, mental state-causation, and physical causal-closure. We generally assume a causally closed physical world that seems to exclude agency in the sense of mental state-causation in addition to physical causation. However, Horgan argues for an account of agency that satisfies the experience of our own as acting persons and that is compatible with physical causal-closure. Mental properties are causal properties but not identical with physical properties because there are different ontological levels. In this commentary, I shall reconsider the essential issues of this compatibilism (1), focus on a problem for Horgan’s conception of agent causation that arises from the causal argument for ontological reductionism (2), and propose to embed Horgan’s conception of agency within a reductionist approach in order to vindicate the indispensable character of agency (3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See also Horgan’s own reference (2001).

References:

  • Bickle, J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction: The new wave. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, R. (1998). Collapse of the new wave. Journal of Philosophy, 95, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfeld, M., & Sachse, C. (2007). Theory reduction by means of functional sub-types. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil, J. (2003). From an ontological point of view. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. (2001). Multiple reference, multiple realization, and the reduction of mind. In F. Siebelt & B. Preyer (Eds.), Reality and Humean supervenience: Essays on the philosophy of David Lewis (pp. 205–221). Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Kim, J. (2005). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachse, C. (2007). Reductionism in the philosophy of science. Frankfurt (Main): Ontos-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This commentary elaborates on my commentary on Horgan, I presented at the conference Mental causation, externalism, and self-knowledge (2005, University of Tübingen). My thanks to the organizers of that conference, and the participants, especially Michael Esfeld, Jens Harbecke, Vera Hoffmann, Terry Horgan and Georg Sparber. The work on this commentary has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF), grant nr. 100011-105218/1

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Sachse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sachse, C. What About a Reductionist Approach? Comments on Terry Horgan. Erkenn 67, 201–205 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-007-9068-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-007-9068-8

Keywords

Navigation