Abstract
What is the minimal algebraic structure to reason about information flow? Do we really need the full power of Boolean algebras with co-closure and de Morgan dual operators? How much can we weaken and still be able to reason about multi-agent scenarios in a tidy compositional way? This paper provides some answers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baltag, A., & Moss, L. S. (2004). Logics for epistemic programs. Synthese, 139.
Baltag A., Coecke B., Sadrzadeh M. (2007) Epistemic actions as resources. Journal of Logic and Computation 17(3): 555–585
Baltag, A., Moss, L. S., & Solecki, S. (1999). The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicions, CWI Technical Report SEN-R9922.
Davey B.A., Priestley H.A. (1990) Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., & Vardi, M.Y. (1995). Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press.
Gehrke M., Nagahashi H., Venema Y. (2005) A Sahlqvist theorem for distributive modal logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 131: 65–102
Gerbrandy J. et al (1999) Dynamic Epistemic Logic. In: Moss L.S. (eds) Logic, Language, and Information 2. CSLI Publication, Stanford University
Hintikka J. (1962) Knowledge and belief: An introduction to the logic of two notions. Cornell University Press, New York
Jonsson B., Tarski A. (1951) Boolean algebras with operators I. American Journal of Mathematics 73: 891–939
Jonsson B., Tarski A. (1952) Boolean algebras with operators II. American Journal of Mathematics 74: 127–162
Joyal, A., & Tierney, M. (1984). An extension of the Galois theory of Grothendieck. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 309.
Meyer J.J.C., van der Hoek W. (1995) Epistemic Logic for Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, in Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science, Vol. 41. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Plaza, J. (1989). Logics of public communications. Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems.
Sadrzadeh, M. (2005). Actions and Resources in Epistemic Logic, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Quebec at Montreal, http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~ms6/all.pdf.
van Benthem J. (1989) Logic in action. Journal of Philosophical Logic 20: 225–263
van Der Hoek, W., & Wooldridge, M. (2002). Time, knowledge, and cooperation: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic, COORDINATION.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Member of the research Group on Philosophy of Information (GPI) and Information Ethics Group (IEG), University of Hertfordshire and Oxford University. From October 2008, EPSRC Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Oxford University Computing Laboratory.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadrzadeh, M. Ockham’s razor and reasoning about information flow. Synthese 167, 391–408 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9414-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9414-7