Skip to main content
Log in

Implied non-coreference and the pattern of anaphora

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi: 1988, ‘Psych Verbs and Theta-theory’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, D.: 1984,On the Content of Empty Categories, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, L.: 1989, ‘Work in Progress’, ms. Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrall, W.: 1974,Viewpoint, Reflexives, and the Nature of Noun Phrases, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G.: 1987, ‘Same and Different’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 531–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986,Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, A.: 1987, ‘They Held Each Other's Breath and Other Puzzles for the Binding Theory’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, D.: 1984, The Formal Grammar of Switch-Reference, University Mass Ph.D. dissertation, distributed by GLSA, University Mass., Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G.: 1973, ‘Some Remarks on Split Controller Phenomena’, in C. Corum, T. Smith-Stark, and A. Weiser (eds.),Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber,: 1976,Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, Linguistic Series Number 25, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I., H. Lasnik and R. May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’,Linguistic Inquiry 21, 63–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellan, L.: 1988,Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘Logical Form, Binding and Nominals’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 395–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.: 1983, ‘A Note on the Binding Theory’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 554–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R.: 1972,Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P. and P. Neubauer: 1976, ‘Rule Cyclicity: Evidence from the Intervention Constraint’,Linguistic Inquiry 7, 429–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1975,French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E.: 1988, ‘Complex Anphors and Bind Alpha’, inCLS 24, Chicago Linguistics Club, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J.: 1978,Locality Principles in Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, S.: 1987,Functional Syntax, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.: 1988, ‘Scope and Comparatives’,Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H.: 1980, ‘On Two Recent Treatments of Disjoint Reference’,Linguistic Research l, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H. and T. Stowell: 1987, ‘Weakest Crossover’, to appear inLinguistic Inquiry.

  • Lebeaux, D.: 1983, ‘A Distributional Difference Between Reciprocals and Reflexives’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 723–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D.: 1984/5, ‘Locality and Anaphoric Binding’,The Linguistic Review 4, 343–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mating, J.: 1984, ‘Non-clause Bounded Reflexives in Icelandic’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 211–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, D.-J.: 1989,Predication Theory; A Case Study for Indexing Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, P.: 1984, ‘Liage et Contiguité, in J.-C. Milner (ed.),Actes de la table ronde sur l'anaphore, Cahiers de l'E.R.A. 642, Paris.

  • Pica, P.: 1987, ‘On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle’, inProceedings of NELS 17, J. McDonough and B. Plunkett, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P.: 1974,On Raising, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T.: 1983, ‘Coreference and Bound Anaphora; A Restatement of the Anaphora Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. and E. Reuland: 1989, ‘Anaphoric Territories’, ms., Tel Aviv University and University of Groningen.

  • Rooth, M.: 1985,Association with Focus, University of Massachusetts Ph.D. dissertation, GLSA, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.: 1970, ‘On Declarative Sentences’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.),Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, K.: 1987a, ‘What Explains the Definiteness Effect’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.),The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, K.: 1987b, ‘The Syntactic Projection of Lexical Thematic Structure’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(4).

  • Safir, K. and T. Stowell: 1988, ‘Binominal Each’, inNELS 18, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, L: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, unpublished MIT Ph.D dissertation.

  • Sells, P.: 1987, ‘Aspects of Logophoricity’,Linguistic Inquiry 18; 369–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, P., A. Zaenen and D. Zec: 1987, ‘Relations between Syntax, Semantics and Lexical Structure’, in M. Iida, S. Wechsler and D. Zec (eds.),Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure, CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely, D.: 1987, ‘Stressed and Non-stressed Anaphors, the Binding Theory and Chains’, unpublished ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zribi-Hertz, A.: 1981, ‘Coréférence et pronoms réfléchis: notes sur le contraste luillui-même en français’,Linguisticae Investigationes 4, 131–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zribi-Hertz, A.: 1989, ‘Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View: English Reflexive Pronouns in Sentence and Discourse’,Language 65, 695–727.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank audiences at the CUNY Graduate Center, NELS XIX at Cornell, USC and the University of Maryland for helpful commentary. In particular I would like to thank Maria Bittner, Luigi Burzio, Greg Carlson, Martin Everaert, Robert Fiengo, Dan Finer, Allesandra Giorgi, Arild Hestvik, Jim Higginbotham, David Lebeaux, Donna Jo Napoli and Sten Vikner for useful discussions. I would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for useful criticism and Pauline Jacobson for her editorial judgement, most of it right, however much I resisted it. Research for this work was supported by an NEH Summer Stipend (1988), a Trustees Research Grant from Rutgers University, and a Research Council Grant (1989–90), also from Rutgers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Safir, K. Implied non-coreference and the pattern of anaphora. Linguist Philos 15, 1–52 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635831

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635831

Keywords

Navigation