Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Definition of Ecology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I discuss the proposition that ecologists may place restrictions on the kinds of plants and animals and on the kinds of systems they consider relevant to assessing the resiliency of ecological generalizations. I argue that to restrict the extension of ecological science and its concepts in order to exclude cultivated plants, captive animals, and domesticated environments ecologists must appeal either (1) to the boundaries of their discipline; (2) to the idea that the effects of human activity are rare and unusual enough to count as ceteris paribus conditions; or (3) to the nature/culture divide. The boundaries of their discipline, however, are practical, not epistemological. The effects of human activity are ubiquitous and profound. And the nature/culture divide, as far as I know, has been infra dignitatem in the natural sciences at least since Charles Darwin and John Stuart Mill. Ecologists may reason, moreover, that organisms and systems that have the kind of history that interests them must as a result possess a kind of organization or some other general biological property that distinguishes them from those that do not. This is to commit a genetic fallacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E et al (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53(12):1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Fisheries Society (2016) Researchers play matchmaker to save fish population. https://fisheries.org/2016/01/researchers-play-matchmaker-to-save-fish-population/. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  • Andrewartha HG (1961) Introduction to the study of animal populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Angner E (2015) To navigate safely in the vast sea of empirical facts. Synthese 192(11):3557–3575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamford M, Calver M (2014) A precise definition of habitat is needed for effective conservation and communication. Aust Zool 37(2):245–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer F (2014) Swim to sea? These salmon are catching a lift. New York Times, April 18

  • Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2006) Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellemain E, Ricklefs RE (2008) Are islands the end of the colonization road? Trends Ecol Evol 23(8):461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2008) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder CR, Hinkel J, Bots PWG, Pahl-Wostl C (2013) Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(4):26. 10.5751/ES-05551-180426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley B (1998) Two ways to talk about change: ‘The child’ of the sublime versus radical pedagogy. In: Bayer BM, Shotter J (eds) Reconstructing the psychological subject: bodies, practices and technologies. Sage Publications, London, pp 68–93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Sax DF (2004) An essay on some topics concerning invasive species. Austral Ecol 29(5):530–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell NA, Reece JB, Taylor MR, Simon EJ, Dickey JL (2009) Biology: concepts and connections, 6th edn. Pearson/Benjamin Cummings, New York

  • Courchamp F, Dunne JA, Le Maho Y, May RM, Thébaud C, Hochberg ME (2015) Fundamental ecology is fundamental. Trends Ecol Evol 30(1):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ, Harral JE (2001) Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science 291:864–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1838–39) Notebook. http://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/published/1960_Notebooks_F1574d.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  • Daston L (1995) How nature became the other: anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism in early modern natural philosophy. In Biology as society, society as biology: metaphors, pp. 37–56. Springer, Netherlands

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA (2009) Invasion biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Gemmell NJ, Rand TA, Ewers RM (2007) Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol 22(9):489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI et al (1998) Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (2013) Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?. In Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol 280, No. 1754, p. 20122845. The Royal Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Roughgarden J (1987) The science of ecology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC (2015) Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere. Ecol Monogr 85(3):287–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S et al (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19(5):589–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC, Kaplan JO, Fuller DQ et al (2013) Used planet: a global history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(20):7978–7985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton C (1966) The pattern of animal communities. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ESA (2016) About. Ecological society of America. ESA.org. http://www.esa.org/esa/about. Accessed 26 Oct 2016

  • Estrada A, Morales-Castilla I, Caplat P, Early R (2016) Usefulness of species traits in predicting range shifts. Trends in ecology evolution 31(3):190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk-Petersen J, Bøhn T, Sandlund OT (2006) On the numerous concepts in invasion biology. Biol Invasions 8(6):1409–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauth JE, Bernardo J, Camara M et al (1996) Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: a conceptual approach. Am Nat 147(2):282–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flagg TA (2015) Balancing conservation and harvest objectives: a review of considerations for the management of salmon hatcheries in the US Pacific Northwest. North Am J Aquac 77(3):367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2014) Global aquaculture production. http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/global-aquaculture-production/en

  • Foucault M (1986) The care of the self: the history of sexuality, vol 3. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel TE (1996) On the concept of industrial ecology. Annu Rev Energy Env 21(1):69–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray A (1963) [1860] The origin of species by means of natural selection. In: Dupree AH (ed) Darwiniana. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Wackernagel M, Wrbka T (2004) Land use and sustainability indicators. An introduction. Land Use Policy 21(3):193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (2000) Beyond the nature-culture dualism. Biol Philos 15(2):155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gyllenberg M (1997) Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science 275:397–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon LJ, Harrison S (2015) Species diversity is dynamic and unbounded at local and continental scales. Am Nat 185(5):584–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmus MR, Mahler DL, Losos JB (2014) Island biogeography of the Anthropocene. Nature 513(7519):543–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SB (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen SA (2016) Like Hercules and the Hydra: trade-offs and strategies in ecological model-building and experimental design. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C 57:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen SA (2017) Are humans disturbing conditions in ecology? Biol Philos 32(1):51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie IC (1975) Epistle to the anthropologists. Am Anthropol 77(2):253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jax K (2006) Ecological units: definitions and application. Q Rev Biol 81(3):237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinski LW, Graedel TE, Laudise RA et al (1992) Industrial ecology: concepts and approaches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(3):793–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller EF (2005) Ecosystems, organisms, and machines. Bioscience 55(12):1069–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox B, Ladiges P, Evans B, Saint R (2010) Biology: an Australian focus. McGraw-Hill, North Ryde

  • Krebs CJ (1972) Ecology. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (2001) Ecology. Benjamin Cummings, an imprint of Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, Menlo Park

  • Lange M (2002) Who’s afraid of ceteris-paribus laws? Or: how I learned to stop worrying and love them. Erkenntnis 57:407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange M (2005) Ecological laws: what would they be and why would they matter? Oikos 110:394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1(5):431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1999) Towards a science of ecological management. Conserv Ecol 3(2):6. http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art6/

  • Levin PS, Williams JG (2002) Interspecific effects of artifically propagated fish: an additional conservation risk for salmon. Conserv Biol 16(6):1581–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linquist S, Gregory TR, Elliott TA et al (2016) Yes! There are resilient generalizations (or “laws”) in ecology. Q Rev Biol 91(2):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litrico I, Violle C (2015) Diversity in plant breeding: a new conceptual framework. Trends Plant Sci 20(10):604–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald IA, Loope LL, Usher MB, Hamann O (1989) Wildlife conservation and the invasion of nature reserves by introduced species: a global perspective. In: Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New York, pp 215–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader SS (2004) Biology. 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, North Ryde

  • Magnusson WE (2013) The words “population” and “community” have outlived their usefulness in ecological publications. Natureza e Conservação 11(1):1–8. doi:10.4322/natcon.2013.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski B (1945) In: Kaberry PM (ed) The dynamics of cultural change: an inquiry into race relations in Africa. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Wolf LL (1973) General ecology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1875) Nature, the utility of religion, and theism. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, London. Mill’s “Essay on Nature” is available at https://archive.org/details/a592828200milluoft

  • Milla R, Osborne CP, Turcotte MM, Violle C (2015) Plant domestication through an ecological lens. Trends Ecol Evol 30(8):463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SC (2005) How useful is the concept of habitat?–a critique. Oikos 110(3):634–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV (2001) Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept (with full military honors, of course!). Ecology 82(12):3275–3284

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164(3877):262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd edn. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster S (2010) China’s tiger farms spark a standoff. Wall Street J. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703455804575057101418533006.html

  • Pounds JA, Puschendorf R (2004) Ecology: clouded futures. Nature 427:107–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23(5):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11(1):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States most invasive plants have been introduced for horticultural use by nurseries, botanical gardens, and individuals. Bioscience 51(2):103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A (2014) Biological invasions simply explained. Bioscience 64(2):154–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Ricciardi A (2013) Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide. Divers Distrib 19(12):1461–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M et al (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diver Distrib 6(2):93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TP, Wint GW, Conchedda G et al (2014) Mapping the global distribution of Livestock. PLoS One 9(5):e96084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M (1999) Heeding the warning in biodiversity’s basic law. Science 284(5412):276–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff M (2016) Are there general causal forces in ecology? Synthese 193:3003–3024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner SM, Willig MR (2008) A general theory of ecology. Theor Ecol 1(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1986) Mechanistic approaches to community ecology: a new reductionism. Am Zool 26(1):81–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secord JA (1981) Nature’s fancy: Charles Darwin and the breeding of pigeons. Isis 72:163–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelford MB (1913) The decline of primeval communities at the head of Lake Michigan. In: Shelford VE (ed) Animal communities in temperate America. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2010) Invasions of plant communities–more of the same, something very different, or both? Am Midl Nat 163(1):220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Souza L, Nuñez MA, Barrios-Garcia MN, Bunn W (2012) The natives are restless, but not often and mostly when disturbed. Ecology 93(3):598–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P et al (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28(1):58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (1991) General energetics: energy in the biosphere and civilization. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiling P (1992) Ecology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T.J., Barnett, D.T. and Kartesz, J.T., 2003. The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Front Ecol Environ 1(1):11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2015) Rapid acceleration of plant speciation during the Anthropocene. Trends Ecol Evol 30(8):448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Palmer G (2015) Non-native plants add to the British flora without negative consequences for native diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(14):4387–4392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K (2014) Where do camels belong? The story and science of invasive species. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Valéry L, Fritz H, Lefeuvre JC (2013) Another call for the end of invasion biology. Oikos 122(8):1143–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M (2014) The value of biodiversity: a humbling analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 29:138–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villee CA (1972) Biology. WB Saunders Compamy, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Voget FW (1975) A history of ethnology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner MR, Block WM, Geils BW, Wenger KF (2000) Restoration ecology. J For 98(10):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Gunderson LH, Kinzig AP et al (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/

  • Weber M (1949) [1904] Objectivity in social science and social policy. In: Shilsand EA, Finch HA (eds) The methodology of the social sciences. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH, Levin SA, Root RB (1973) Niche, habitat, and ecotope. Am Nat 107(955):321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) (2008) Eating our future: the environmental impact of industrial animal agriculture. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/animal-welfare/news-detail/en/c/12203/. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  • World Wildlife Fund (2014) More tigers in American backyards than in the wild. https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/more-tigers-in-american-backyards-than-in-the-wild. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Andrew Inkpen for many helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Mark Sagoff

Authors
  1. Mark Sagoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Sagoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sagoff, M. On the Definition of Ecology. Biol Theory 12, 85–98 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0263-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0263-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation