Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T10:24:39.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply to Professor Weintraub

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Andrea Salanti
Andrea Salanti
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1993 , pp. 139 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, Roger. 1993. “Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis.” Economics and Philosophy (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1984. “Economic Theory in the Mathematical Mode.” American Economic Review 74:267–78.Google Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1986. “Theoretic Models: Mathematical Form and Economic Content.” Econometrica 54:1259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1988. “Comments from Outside Economics.” In The Consequences of Economic Rlietoric, edited by Klamer, Arjo, McCloskey, Donald N., and Solow, Robert M., pp. 21–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingrao, Bruna, and Israel, Giorgio. 1990. The Invisible Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Clarence H. (editor). 1979. Moriae encomium id est stultitiae laus, Vol. IV–3 of Opera omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Punzo, Lionello. 1991. “The School of Mathematical Formalism and the Viennese Circle of Mathematical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanti, Andrea. 1991. “Roy Weintraub's Studies in Appraisal. Lakatosian Consolations or Something Else?” Economics and Philosophy 7:221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanti, Andrea. 1993. “Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis: A Comment.” Economics and Philosophy (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1979. Microfoundations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1985. General Equilibrium Analysis. Studies in Appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1988. “The Neo-Walrasian Program Is Empirically Progressive.” In The Popperian Legacy in Economics, edited by de Marchi, Neil, pp. 213–27. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1993. “But Doctor Salanti, Bumblebees Really Do Fly.” Economics and Philosophy 9:135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar