Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relativist ethics, scientific objectivity, and concern for human rights

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper comments on the conflict between ethical relativism and anthropologists’ concerns with rights, and tries to show that neither scientific objectivity nor respect for cultural diversity require denying an extracultural stance for ethical judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salmon, M. (1997) Ethical considerations in anthropology and archaeology, or relativism and justice for all, Journal of Anthropological Research 53: 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boas, F. (1948) Race, Language, and Culture, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mead, M. (1928) Coming of Age in Samoa, Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benedict, R. (1934) Patterns of Culture, Houghton Mifflin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lowie, R. (1937) History of Ethnological Theory, Farrar and Rinehart, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Proctor, R.N. (1991) Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, M. (1968) The Rise of Anthropological Theory, Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995) the primacy of the ethical, Current Anthropology 36(3): 409–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Watkins, J. (1999) Conflicting codes: Professional, Ethical, and Legal Obligations in Archaeology, Science and Engineering Ethics 5: 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandt, R.B. (1959) Ethical Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankena, W. (1973) Ethics, 2nd. ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stevenson, C. L. (1944) Ethics and Language, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crossette, B. (1999) Testing the limits of tolerance as cultures mix, New York Times, pp. A 15, A 17.

  14. Evans-Pritchard, E. (1937) Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nagengast, C. (1997) Women, minorities, and indigenous peoples: Universalism and cultural relativity, Journal for Anthropological Research 53,3: 349–370.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zechenter, E. M. (1997) In the name of culture: Cultural relativism and the abuse of the individual, Journal for Anthropological Research 53,3: 319–348.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hatch, E. (1997) The good side of cultural relativism, Journal for Anthropological Research 53,3: 371–381.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lyons, D. (1965) Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Belnap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baker, J. ed. (1994) Group Rights, Toronto University Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baier, A. (1994) Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murphy, J.G. & Hampton, J. (1988) Forgiveness and Mercy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salmon, M.H. Relativist ethics, scientific objectivity, and concern for human rights. SCI ENG ETHICS 5, 311–318 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0040-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0040-7

Keywords

Navigation