Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

We introduce several senses of the principle ofcompositionality. We illustrate the difference between them with thehelp of some recent results obtained by Cameron and Hodges oncompositional semantics for languages of imperfect information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blass, A. and Gurevich, Y., 1986, “Henkin quantifiers and complete problems,” Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 32, 1–16.

  • Cameron, P. and Hodges, W., “Some combinatorics of imperfect information,” forthcoming.

  • Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M., 1991, “Dynamic predicate logic,” Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., 1961, “Some remarks on infinitary long formulas,” pp. 167–183 in Infinitistic Methods, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J., 1996, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and Sandu, G., 1989, “Informational independence as a semantical phenomenon,” pp. 571–589 in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VIII, J.E. Fenstad, I.T. Frolov, and R. Hilpinen, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and Sandu, G., 1997, “Game-theoretical semantics,” pp. 361–410 in Handbook of Logic and Language, A. ter Meulen and J. van Benthem, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, W., 1997a, “Compositional semantics for a language of imperfect information,” Journal of the IPGL 5, 539–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, W., 1997b, “Some strange quantifiers,” pp. 51–65 in Structures in Logic and Computer Science, J. Mycielski, G. Rozenberg, and A. Salomaa, eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1261, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, W., 1998, “Compositionality is not the problem,” Logic and Logical Philosophy 6, 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, W., 2001, “Formal features of compositionality,” Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 10, 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Th., 1997, “Compositionality,” pp. 417–473 in Handbook of Logic and Language, A. ter Meulen and J. van Benthem, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolaitis, Ph., 1985, “Game quantification,” pp. 365–421 in Model-Theoretic Logics, J. Barwise and S. Feferman, eds., New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krynicki, M. and Mostowski, M., 1995, “Henkin quantifiers,” pp. 193–262 in Quantifiers: Logics, Models, and Computation, M. Krynicki, M. Mostowski, and L.W. Szczerba, eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandu, G. and Väänänen, J., 1992, “Partially ordered connectives,” Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 38, 361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerstå hl, D., 1998, “On mathematical proofs of the vacuity of compositionality,” Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 635–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadrozny, W., 1994, “From compositional to systematic semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandu, G., Hintikka, J. Aspects of Compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 49–61 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026530709583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026530709583

Navigation