Abstract
This contribution to the adaptationism debate elaborates the nature of constraints and their importance in evolutionary explanation and argues that the adaptationism debate should be limited to the issue of how to privilege causes in evolutionary explanation. I argue that adaptationist explanations are deeply conceptually dependent on developmental constraints, and explanations that appeal to constraints are dependant on the results of natural selection. I suggest these explanations should be integrated into the framework of historical causal explanation. Each strategy explicitly appeals to some aspect of the evolutionary process, while implicitly appealing to others. Thus, adaptationists and anti-adaptationists can offer complementary causal explanations of the same explanandum. This eliminates much of the adaptationism debate and explains why its adversaries regularly agree with each other more than they would like. The adaptationism issue that remains is a species of the general issue of how to privilege causes in explanation. I show how a proposed solution to this general problem might be brought to bear on evolutionary explanations, and investigate some difficulties that might arise due to the nature of the evolutionary process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amundson R. 1994. Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptation and the Challenge From Developmental Biology. Philosophy of Science 61: 556-578.
Dennett D.C. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Simon and Schuster.
Gould S.J. 1980. 'Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?'. Paleobiology 6: 119-130.
Gould S.J. 1982. 'Darwinism and the Expansion of Evolutionary Theory'. Science 216: 380-387.
Gould S.J. 1989. 'A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution. Evolution 43: 516-539.
Gould S.J. and Lewontin R. 1979. 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme' Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B208:, pp. 581-589.
Griffiths P.E. 1996. 'The Historical Turn in the Study of Adaptation'. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 47: 511-532.
Hesslow G. 1983. 'Explaining differences and weighting causes'. Theoria 49: 87-111.
Kier W.M. and Curtin N.A. 2002. “Fast muscle in squid (loligo paelei ): contractile properties of a specialized muscle fibre type. ”. Journal of Experimental Biology 205: 1907-1916.
Lack D. 1968. Ecological adaptations for breeding birds. Methuen, London.
Llyod E. 1995. “Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies”. Synthese 104: 351-381.
Maynard Smith J. 1978. 'Optimization theory in evolution'. Annual Report of Ecology and Systematics 9: 31-56.
Mayr E. 1983. 'How to carry out the adaptationist program?'. The American Naturalist 121: 324-334.
Nijhout H.F. and Emlen D.J. 1998. 'Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95:, pp. 3685-3689.
Orzack S.H. and Sober E. 1994. 'Optimality models and the test of adaptationism”. American Naturalist 143: 361-380.
Sober E. 1996. 'Evolution and Optimality: Feathers, Bowling Balls, and the Thesis of Adaptationism'. Philosophic Exchange 26: 41-57.
Stearns S.C. 1986. 'Natural Selection and Fitness, adaptations and constraint;. In: Raup D.M. and Jablonski D. (eds), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life. Springer-Verlag, N.Y.
Stephens D.W. and Krebs J.R. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press.
Sterelny K. and Griffiths P. 1999. Sex and Death. The University of Chicago Press.
Symons D. 1979. The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford University Press, New York.
Raup and Jablonski D. (eds) Patterns and Processes in the history of Life. Springer-Verlag, N.Y., pp. 23-44.
Van Fraassen B. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press.
Van Leeuwen J. and Kier W. 1997. 'Functional design of tentacles in squid: linking sarcomere ultrastructure to gross morphological dynamics'. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 352: 551-571.
Webster G. and Goodwin B. 1982. The Origin of Species: A Structuralist Approach. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5: 15-47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sansom, R. Constraining the adaptationism debate. Biology & Philosophy 18, 493–512 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025581622161
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025581622161