Abstract
The key idea behind the diagrammatic approach presented in the paper is that the sophisticated mechanisms of human visual construction also play an important role in natural languages. We propose a diagrammatic representation of English, giving examples, translation rules, and semantics. Special attention will be paid to anaphoric phenomena, in particular, the possibility of a uniform treatment of anaphoric pronouns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barwise J. (1987) Noun phrases, generalized quantifiers and anaphora. In: Gärdenfors P. (ed.) Generalized quantifiers: Linguistic and logical approaches. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht
Evans G. (1977) Pronouns, quantifiers, and relative clauses (I). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7:3: 467–536
Geach P. T. (1962) Reference and generality. An examination of some medieval and modern theories. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Giaquinto M. (2007) Visual thinking in mathematics. An epistemological study. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. (1991) Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(1): 39–100
Hammer E. (2006) Peircean graphs for propositional logic. In: Barwise J., Allwein G. (eds.) Logical reasoning with diagrams. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hoffman D. D. (2000) Visual intelligence: How we create what we see. W.W. Norton & Company, New York
Jacobson P. (2000) Paycheck pronouns, Bach-Peters sentences, and variable-free semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8: 77–155
Kamp H., van Eijck J. (1997) Representing discourse in context. In: van Benthem J., Ter Meulen A. (eds.) Handbook of logic and language. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 179–237
Kamp J. A. W. et al (1981) A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk J. (eds.) Formal methods in the study of language. Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam, pp 277–322
Karttunen, L. (1969). Pronouns and variables. In R. I. Binnick et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of V Chicago Linguistics Society meeting (pp. 108–116). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Kosslyn S. M. (1978) Imagery and Internal Representations. In: Rosch E., Lloyd B. (eds.) Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
Lepore E., Garson J. (1983) Pronouns and quantifier scope in English. Journal of Philosophical Logic 12: 327–358
Mancosu P. (2005) Visualization in logic and mathematics. In: Mancosu P., Jorgensen K. F. (eds.) Visualization, explanation and reasoning styles in mathematics. Springer, Dordrecht
Miller A. I. (1986) Imagery in scientific thought, creating 20th-century physics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Partee, B. H. (1973). Deletion and variable binding. In E. L. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural languages: Papers from a colloquium sponsored by the King’s College Research Center (1975) (pp. 16–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pylyshyn Z. W. (1981) The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review 88(1): 16–45
San Ginés, A. (2010). Pronoms anaphoriques et diagrammes. Est-il possible de trouver un traitement uniforme des pronoms anaphoriques dans le discours naturel? Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Européennes.
San Ginés, A., & Frápolli, M. J. (2009). Hombres, burros y situaciones: de vuelta con el condicional. In J. Alcolea, V. Iranzo, A. Sánchez, & J. Valor (Eds.), Actas del VI Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España (SLMFCE) (pp. 203–208). Valladolid.
Sandu G. (1997) On the theory of anaphora: Dynamic predicate logic vs. game theoretical semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 147–174
Shepard R. N. (1978) The mental image. American Psychologist 33: 125–137
van Benthem J. (1984a) The logic of semantics. In: Landman F., Veltman F. (eds.) Varieties of formal semantics. Proceedings of the fourth Amsterdam colloquium, September 1982. Foris Publications, Dordrecht
von Heusinger K. (2000) The reference of indefinites. In: von Heusinger K., Egli U. (eds.) Reference and anaphoric relations. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
San Ginés, A. Seeing the language: a diagrammatic approach to natural discourse. Synthese 186, 411–439 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9987-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9987-4