Skip to main content
Log in

We should not allow dissection of animals

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay argues against routine dissection exercises on animals under three headings. First, attaining goals of general scientific education does not require dissection. The training of specialists, in whose vocations dissection skills are essential, could then be accomplished without killing animals specifically for the purpose of acquiring those skills. Second, killing and dissecting animals for unnecessary exercises teaches students bad attitudes toward animal life. Third, moral principles cannot justify killing and dissecting animals but not humans; consequently, such treatment of animals is prejudiced exploitation of the weak by the strong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Keiser, Terry D. 1991.The Science Teacher, January, p. 15.

  • Griffin, Donald R. 1991.The Question of Animal Awareness, p. 88. New York: Rockefeller University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sapontzis, S.F. We should not allow dissection of animals. J Agric Environ Ethics 8, 181–189 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251882

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251882

Keywords

Navigation