Abstract
The idea of interpretability logics arose in Visser [Vis90]. He introduced the logics as extensions of the provability logic GLwith a binary modality ▸. The arithmetic realization of A ▸ B in a theory T will be that T plus the realization of B is interpretable in T plus the realization of A (T + A interprets T + B). More precisely, there exists a function f (the relative interpretation) on the formulas of the language of T such that T + B ⊢ C implies T + A ⊢ f(C).
The interpretability logics were considered in several papers. An arithmetic completeness of the interpretability logic ILM, obtained by adding Montagna's axiom to the smallest interpretability logic IL, was proved in Berarducci [Ber90] and Shavrukov [Sha88] (see also Hájek and Montagna [HM90] and Hájek and Montagna [HM92]). [Vis90] proved that the interpretability logic ILP, an extension of IL, is also complete for another arithmetic interpretation. The completeness with respect to Kripke semantics due to Veltman was, for IL, ILMand ILP, proved in de Jongh and Veltman [JV90]. The fixed point theorem of GLcan be extended to ILand hence ILMand ILP(cf. de Jongh and Visser [JV91]). The unary pendant "T interprets T + A" is much less expressive and was studied in de Rijke [Rij92]. For an overview of interpretability logic, see Visser [Vis97], and Japaridze and de Jongh [JJ98].
In this paper, we give a cut-free sequent system for IL. To begin with, we give a cut-free system for the sublogic IL4of IL, whose ▸-free fragment is the modal logic K4. A cut-elimination theorem for ILis proved using the system for IK4and a property of Löb's axiom.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berarducci, A., ‘The interpretability logic of Peano arithmetic’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic55 (1990), 1059-1089.
Gentzen, G., ‘Untersuchungen über das logisch Schliessen’, Mathematische Zeitschrift39 (1934–35), 176-210, 405–431.
HÁjek, P., and F. Montagna, ‘The logic of Π1-conservativity’, Archiv for für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung30 (1990), 113-123.
HÁjek, P., and F. Montagna, ‘The logic of Π1-conservativity continued’, Archiv for für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung32 (1992), 57-63.
Japaridze, G., and D. H. J.de Jongh, ‘The logic of provability’, pp. 475-546 in Handbook of Proof Theory, edited by S. R. Buss, University of California, 1998.
de Jongh, D. H. J., and F. Veltman, ‘Provability logics for relative interpretability’, pp. 31-42 in [Pet90].
de Jongh, D. H. J., and A. Visser, ‘Explicit fixed points in interpretability logic’, Studia Logica50 (1991), 39-50.
Petkov, P.(ed.), Mathematical Logic, Proceedings of the Heyting 1988 Summer School, Plenum Press, 1990.
de Rijke, M., ‘Unary interpretability logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic33 (1992), 249-272.
Sasaki, K., ‘Löb's axiom and cut-elimination theorem’, Journal of the Nanzan Academic Society Mathematical Sciences and Information Engineering1 (2001), 91-98.
Shavrukov, V.Yu., ‘The logic of relative interpretability over Peano arithmetic’ (Russian), Technical Report No. 5, Stekhlov Mathematical Institute, Moscow, 1988.
Visser, A., ‘Interpretability logic’, pp. 175-209 in [Pet90].
Visser, A., ‘An overview of interpretability logic’, in Advances in Modal Logic '96, edited by M. Kraft, M. de Rijke, and H. Wansing, CSLI Publications, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sasaki, K. A Cut-Free Sequent System for the Smallest Interpretability Logic. Studia Logica 70, 353–372 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015150314504
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015150314504