Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:33:39.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Artistic Disenfranchisement of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Carole Talon-Hugon*
Affiliation:
University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, France
*
Carole Talon-Hugon, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, 28 Avenue Valombrose, 06100 Nice, France. Email: carole.talon-hugon@wanadoo.fr

Abstract

After modernist formalism, contemporary artworks are often assigned a critic function: they are said to “question”, “reconsider”, “call for reflection” on the world… Such formulas refer to the Socratic foundation of philosophy, whereas the philosopher was the one who brought to light the fragility of opinions, discovered prejudices, undid ordinary beliefs and convictions that were not grounded in reason.

Thus, after the preeminence of philosophy on art, as in the philosophical systems that dominated the 19 th century, we observe nowadays a predominance of art on philosophy’s very task, that is, critical questioning. This paper attempts to reconstruct the historical origin of this new theoretical attitude, and to evaluate its pertinence through an examination of the conditions under which art can carry out such critical programme.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T W (1992) ‘Commitment’ [1962], in Notes to literature, v. 2, ed by Tiedemann, R, trans. by Nicholson, Sh Weber, pp 7694. New York: Columbia UP.Google Scholar
Adorno, T W (2004) Aesthetic Theory [1970], ed by Adorno, G, Tiedemann, R, newly trans. by Robert-Hullot-Kentor, . London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bataille, G (1983) Manet. Genève: Skira.Google Scholar
Danto, A C (1986) The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York: Columbia UP.Google Scholar
Lessing, G E (1984) Laocoon [1766], trans. McCormick, Edward Allen. Baltimore/London: The Johns Hopkins UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, H (1972) The De-Definition of Art. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J-P (1978) What is Literature? Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J-M (1992) L’Art de l’âge moderne. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Schelling, F W J (1989) The Philosophy of Art [1859], trans. Douglas W Scott. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, F (1958) Kritische Ausgabe, Elfter Band. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Talon-Hugon, C (2006) Avignon 2005. Le Conflit des héritages. Arles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar