Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Practical Wisdom behind the GRI

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Humanistic Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an effort to meet growing stakeholder demands for transparency, accountability, and responsibility, many large organizations globally have voluntarily adopted the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines. Moreover, triggered by recent management transgressions, the ancient virtue of practical wisdom (phronesis) has gained increased attention from management scholars, who argue that the Aristotelian concept, with its interdisciplinary nature, has the capacity of turning management back into a holistic, contextual, and virtue-orientated practice. Especially the fact that practical wisdom is firmly based on normative values, coupled with the emphasis on experience and practice, makes it well suited as a leitmotif for sustainable and responsible management. This conceptual paper builds on the link between practical wisdom and sustainability. I argue that the GRI may be regarded as an example of procedural practical wisdom in the context of sustainability reporting, specifically in terms of its emphasis on the holistic and situational dimensions, articulated through the concepts of materiality analysis and stakeholder dialogue. Practical implications, limitations, and avenues for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso-Almeida, M., J. Llach, and F. Marimon. 2014. A closer look at the 'Global reporting Initiative' sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 21: 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonini, C., and C. Larringa. 2017. Planetary boundaries and sustainability indicators/ a survey of corporate reporting boundaries. Sustainable Development 25: 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardelt, M. 2003. Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging 25 (3): 275–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, C., A. Habisch,  and C. Dierksmeier. 2018a. Practical wisdom: Management’s no longer forgotten virtue. Journal of Business Ethics 153 (1): 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, C., L. Sasse, and A. Habisch. 2018b. Applying the practical wisdom lenses in decision-making: An integrative approach to humanistic management. Humanistic Management Journal 2 (2): 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., and S. Pavelin. 2008. Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy & the Environment 17: 120–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J., and M.J. Carter. 2004. A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceres. 2018. Who We Are. Available at: http://www.ceres.org/about-us/who-we-are. Accessed on 1/5/18.

  • Daniels, P.L. 2014. Practical wisdom for managing sustainable enterprises - synthesizing Buddhism and ecological economics. Journal of Management Development 33: 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bettignies, H.-C., P.K. Ip, X. Bai, A. Habisch, and G. Lenssen. 2011. Practical wisdom for management from the Chinese classical traditions. Journal of Management Development 30: 623–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., M. Rankin, and J. Tobin. 2002. An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (3): 312–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., and W. Powell. 1991. Introduction. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. P. Powell and W. DiMaggio, 1–38. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K., and M. Eichinger. 2010. Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics 10 (3): 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, T. 2007. Reporting on the triple bottom line at cascade engineering. Global Business & Organizational Excellence 26 (3): 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, L. 2010. From rational to wise action: Recasting our theories of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 92: 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, L.C., J. McVea, and R.E. Freeman. 2008. Entrepreneurial wisdom: Incorporating the ethical and strategic dimensions of entrepreneurial decision-making. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 6 (1): 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R.G., R.M. Grant, and C.B.M. Van Riel. 2006. Reputation and transparency: Lessons from a painful period in public disclosure. Long Range Planning 39: 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Garah, W., R.I. Beekun, A. Habisch, G. Lenssen, and C.L. Adaui. 2012. Practical wisdom for management from the Islamic tradition. Journal of Management Development 31 (10): 991–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 1998. Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence 2 (3): 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 2010. The transparent economy: Six tigers stalk the global recovery-and how to tame them. Amsterdam: The Global Reporting Initiative. Available: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Explorations_TheTransparentEconomy.pdf Accessed on 13/4/18.

  • FASB. 2008. Financial Accounting Standards Board. Original Pronouncements. Available:http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175820900526&blobheader=application%2Fpdf. Accessed on 1/5/18.

  • Fernandez-Feijoo, B., S. Romero, and S. Ruiz. 2014. Commitment to corporate social responsibility measured through global reporting initiative reporting: Factors affecting the behavior of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 81 (15): 244–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M.S., and M. Drabble. 2012. Focus and standardization of sustainability reporting - a comparative study of the United Kingdom and Finland. Business Strategy & the Environment 21: 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, K., and S.-E. Lee. 2013. Assessing sustainable initiatives of apparel retailers on the internet. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management 17: 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, P.S. 2008. Developing practical management wisdom. Journal of Management Development 27 (5): 528–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R. 2005. Guide to instruments of corporate responsibility: An overview of 16 key tools for labour fund trustees. Toronto: Schulich Business School, York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M., and M. Visconti. 2006. The strategic background to corporate accounting scandals. Long Range Planning 39: 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassl, W., and A. Habsich. 2011. Ethics and economics: Towards a new humanistic synthesis for business. Journal of Business Ethics 99: 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. 2010. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? Anexploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (1): 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI. 2013. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosures. Available: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf. Accessed on 1/4/18.

  • GRI. 2018. GRI Standards. Available: https://www.globalreporting.org/. Accessed on 1/7/18.

  • Hansen, E., and S. Schaltegger. 2016. The sustainability balanced scorecard: A systematic review of architectures. Journal of Business Ethics 133: 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intezari, A. 2015. Integrating wisdom and sustainability: Dealing with instability. Business Strategy & the Environment 24: 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intezari, A., and D.J. Pauleen. 2014. Management wisdom in perspective: Are you virtuous enough to succeed in volatile times? Journal of Business Ethics 120: 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intezari, A., and D.J. Pauleen. 2018. Conceptualizing wise management decision-making: A grounded theory approach. Decision Sciences 49: 335–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. 2017. The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper, No. 11–100. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1799589.

  • Isaksson, R., and U. Steimle. 2009. What does GRI-reporting tell us about corporate sustainability? The TQM Journal 21 (2): 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, G. 2012. Ambiguous but tethered: An accounting basis for sustainability reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 23: 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaipa, P.L. 2014. Making wise decisions: Leadership lessons from Mahabharata. Journal of Management Development 33: 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kletz, P., G. Almog-Bareket, A. Habisch, G. Lenssen, and C. Loza Adaui. 2012. Practical wisdom for management from the Jewish tradition. Journal of Management Development 31 (9): 879–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG 2017. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. Available: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf. Accessed on: 1/5/18.

  • Küpers, W.M., and D.J. Pauleen. 2015. Learning wisdom: Embodied and artful approaches to management education. Scandinavian Journal of Management 31 (4): 493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R., and D. Huisingh. 2011. Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production 19: 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, A.C., A.J. Shenhar, and R.R. Reilly. 2003. Beyond the balanced scorecard: Refining the search for organizational success measures. Long Range Planning 36: 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marker, A.W. 2013. The development of practical wisdom: Its critical role in sustainable performance. Performance Improvement 52: 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., D. Rooney, and K.B. Boal. 2009. Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. Leadership Quarterly 20: 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. 2010. Practical wisdom in managerial decision making. Journal of Management Development 29: 637–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. 2016. Understanding humanistic management. Humanistic Management Journal 1: 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynhardt, T. 2010. The practical wisdom of Peter Drucker: Roots in the Christian tradition. Journal of Management Development 29 (7/8): 616–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monevaa, J.M., P. Archel, and C. Correa. 2006. GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum 30: 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morhardt, J.E. 2009. General disregard for details of GRI human rights reporting by large corporations. Global Business Review 10 (2): 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. 2008. Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (2): 240–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego, P., and A. Kolk. 2012. Multinationals' accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Business Ethics 110: 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M. 2017. In a time of global upheaval- humanistic management thinking needed more than ever. Humanistic Management Journal 1 (2): 155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhonheimer, M. 1994. Praktische Vernunft Und Vernünftigkeit Der Praxis. Handlungstheorie Bei Thomas Von Aquin in Ihrer Entstehung Aus Dem Problemkontext Der Aristotelischen Ethik, (Trans.). Berlin: Akademieverlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roca, E. 2008. Introducing practical wisdom in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics 82: 607–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roca, L.C., and C. Searcy. 2012. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production 20 (1): 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, D., B. McKenna, and P. Liesch. 2010. Wisdom and Management in the Knowledge Economy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, J. 2017. Practical wisdom: Making and teaching the governance case for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 140: 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, L. 2016. The Practical Wisdom Behind the Global Reporting Initiative. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. 3rd International Conference CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance Sustainable Management as a New Business Paradigm. Cologne.

  • Sasse-Werhahn, L., C. Bachmann, and A. Habisch. 2018. Managing tensions in corporate sustainability through a practical wisdom lens. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3994-z.

  • Searcy, C. 2012. Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3): 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A., E.M. Hartman, and J. Fontrodona. 2012. Reviving tradition: Virtue and the common good in business and management. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1): 207–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, K. 2012. Mission impossible? Adopting a CSR-based business model for extractive industries in developing countries. Resources Policy 37: 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A., and L. Lewis. 2002. Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment 11 (2): 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statler, M. 2014. Developing wisdom in a business school? Critical reflections on pedagogical practice. Management Learning 45 (4): 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. 1998. A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology 2: 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. 2007. On Ceres, the GRI and Corporation 20/20. Greenleaf Publishing.

  • Waddock, S. 2016. Foundational memes for a new narrative about the role of business in society. Humanistic Management Journal 1: 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD. 2015. Reporting Matters. Redefining performance and disclosure. Available:http://wbcsdpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/WBCSD_Reporting_Matters_2015_Interactive.pdf pp. 38–42. Accessed on 1/5/18. 

  • Xiang, W. 2016. Ecophronesis. The ecological practical wisdom for and from ecological practice. Landscape and Urban Planning 155: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. 2006. Yi: Practical wisdom in Confucius’s analects. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (3): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their very useful suggestions on a previous draft. The comments received are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Laura Sasse-Werhahn

Authors
  1. Laura Sasse-Werhahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Sasse-Werhahn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasse-Werhahn, L. The Practical Wisdom behind the GRI. Humanist Manag J 4, 71–84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00054-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00054-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation