Skip to main content
Log in

Time, quantum mechanics, and tense

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relational approach to tense holds that “the now”, “passage”, and “becoming” are to be understood in terms of relations between events. The debate over the adequacy of this framework is illustrated by a comparative study of the sense in which physical theories, (in)deterministic and (non)relativistic, can lend expression to the metaphysics at issue. The objective is not to settle the matter, but to clarify the nature of this metaphysics and to establish that the same issues are at stake in the relational approach to value-definiteness and probability in quantum mechanics. They concern the existence of a unique present, respectively actuality, and a notion of identity over time that cannot be paraphrased in terms of relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, D. and B. Loewer: 1988, ‘Interpreting the Many-Worlds Interpretation’, Synthese 77, 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1984, Categories, J. L. Ackrill (trans.), in The Complete Works of Aristotle, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashtekhar, A. and J. Stachel (eds.): 1991, Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Birkhäuser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, H.: 1929, Der Kampf um das Kausalgesetz in der jüngsten Physik, F. Vieweg and Sons, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.: 1962, ‘Review of G. J. Whitrow's “The Natural Philosophy of Time”’, Scientific American CCVI, 181–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, H.: 1952, ‘Relativity and Indeterminacy’, Nature 169, 660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1963, ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, R. and M. Hogarth: 1995, ‘The Definability of Objective Becoming in Minkowski Spacetime’, Synthese 103, 355–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. B.: 1976, Quantum Theory of Open Systems, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1960, ‘A Defense of McTaggart's Proof of the Unreality of Time’, Philosophical Review 69, 497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, A. S.: 1920, Space, Time and Gravitation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1905, ‘Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper’, Annalen der Physik 17, 891–921; translated in J. Stachel (ed.), The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett III, H.: 1957, ‘Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, G. N.: 1991, ‘The Vacuum on Null Planes’, in S. Saunders and H. Brown (eds.), The Philosophy of Vacuum, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardi, G. C., A. Rimini, and T. Weber: 1986, Physical Review D34, 470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K.: 1949, ‘A Remark About the Relationship Between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy’, in A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court, La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewold, H.: 1946, ‘On the Principles of Quantum Mechanics’, Physica 12, 405–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A.: 1973, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, Chap. 10, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XII, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P.: 1984, ‘Objective versus Mind-dependent Theories of Time Flow’, Synthese 61, 423–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P.: 1812, Théorie Analytique des Probabilités, in Oeuvres Completes, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1878–1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M.: 1989, Mind, Brain, and The Quantum, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M.: 1992, ‘What Schrödinger Should Have Learnt from his Cat’, in M. Bitbol and O. Darrigol (eds.), Erwin Schrödinger: Philosophy and the Birth of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 363–84, Editions Frontières, Cedex.

  • Lockwood, M.: 1996, ‘“Many-Minds” Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.

  • Maudlin, T.: 1994, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N.: 1985, ‘Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible?’, Philosophy of Science 52, 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S.: 1976, ‘Objective Time-Flow’, Philosophy of Science 43, 337–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J.: 1927, in C. D. Broad (ed.), The Nature of Existence, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I.: 1686, Principia Mathematica, F. Cajori (trans.), University of California Press, Berkeley, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearle, P.: 1989, ‘Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization’, Physical Review A 39, 227–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearle, P.: 1990, ‘Towards a Relativistic Theory of Statevector Reduction’, in A. Miller (ed.), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1967, ‘Time and Physical Geometry’, Journal of Philosophy 64, 240–47, Editions Frontières reprinted in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975, 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1953, ‘Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory’, Mind 62, 1, Editions Frontières reprinted in The Ways of Paradox and other Essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1966, pp. 137–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1925, ‘The Causal Structure of the World and the Difference Between Past and Future’, in Selected Writings, vol. 2, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp. 81–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietdijk, C.: 1966, ‘A Rigorous Proof of Determinism Derived from the Special Theory of Relativity’, Philosophy of Science 33, 341–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1903, The Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, S.: 1995a, ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics and Decoherence’, Synthese 102, 235–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, S.: 1995b, ‘Relativism’, in R. Clifton (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, S.: 1996, ‘Response to Lockwood’, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.

  • Sklar, L.: 1981, ‘Time, Reality, and Relativity’, in R. Healey (ed.), Reduction, Time and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.: 1962, ‘Time and the World Order’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3, 527–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A.: 1993, ‘The Transient Now’, in Search for a Naturalistic World View, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 271–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H.: 1968, ‘On Einstein-Minkowski Space-Time’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H.: 1991, ‘On Relativity Theory and the Openness of the Future’, Philosophy of Science 58, 147–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.: 1959, Individuals, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H.: 1949, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitrow, G. J.: 1961, The Natural Philosophy of Time, Nelson and Sons Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Hilary Putnam for a careful reading of the manuscript and some helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saunders, S. Time, quantum mechanics, and tense. Synthese 107, 19–53 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413901

Keywords

Navigation