We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
MALCOLM ON CRITERIA.
- Authors
Sayward, Charles
- Abstract
Consider the general proposition that normally when people pain-behave they are in pain. Where a traditional philosopher like Mill tries to give an empirical proof of this proposition (the argument from analogy), Malcolm tries to give a transcendental proof. Malcolm's argument is transcendental in that he tries to show that the very conditions under which we can have a concept provide for the application of the concept and the knowledge that the concept is truly as well as properly applied. The natural basis for applying the concept of pain to someone else is pain-behavior like groaning and crying out. To know that a person pain-behaving is in pain is to rule out countervailing circumstances (smiles, exaggerated cries, winks, absence of plausible cause, and so on). The basic move by Malcolm is to make these special conditions a function merely of the concept of pain.
- Publication
Behavior & Philosophy, 2004, Vol 32, Issue 2, p349
- ISSN
1053-8348
- Publication type
Academic Journal