Skip to main content
Log in

CSR Rating Agencies: What is Their Global Impact?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last two decades, there has been a pronounced growth of CSR rating agencies that assess corporations based on their social and environmental performance. This article investigates the impact of CSR ratings on the behavior of individual corporations. To what extent do corporations adjust their behavior based on how they rank? Our primary finding is that being dropped from a CSR ranking appears to do little to encourage firms to acknowledge and address problems related to their social and environmental performance. Specific rankings appear not to have a widespread effect of influencing firms to acknowledge negative CSR events and publicly present plans and actions to address them. Whether firms are well or poorly ranked, they appear to focus on and publicly discuss their “positive” CSR activities. We discuss the wider significance of these results as well as the overall significance of CSR rankings for a global economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, A.M. and T. Shavit: 2008, “How Can a Ratings-based Method for Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Provide an Incentive to Firms Excluded from Socially Responsible Investment Indices to Invest in CSR?”, Journal of Business Ethics 82(4), 899-905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agle, B.R. and P.C. Kelly: 2001, “Ensuring validity in the measurement of Corporate Social Performance: Lessons from Corporate United Way and PAC campaigns”, Journal of Business Ethics 31(3), 271-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, J. and W. Kamakura: 1995, “The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis”, Journal of Marketing 5, 56-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allouche J. , Laroche P. (2006) The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: A Survey In: Allouche J. (Eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility: Performance and Stakeholders. Palgrave MacMillan, New York pp 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and M. Ghatak: 2007, “Retailing public goods: The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Public Economics 91(9), 1645-1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J.: 1998, “The Events Study Methodology Since 1969”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 11, 111-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. and J. M. Logsdan: 1996, “How Corporate Social Responsibility pays-off”, Long Range Planning 29(4), 495-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelo, M. and L. L. Rodrigues: 2008, “Factor Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies”, Journal of Business Ethics 83(4), 685 – 701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D. and K. Husoy: 2007, “Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: the Case of the United National Global Compact”, Journal of Business Ethics 76(2), 163-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. and D. Levine: 2006, “Breaking Down the Wall of Codes: Evaluating Non-Financial Performance Measurement”, California Management Review 48(2), 29-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A., D. I. Levine and M. W. Toffel: 2007, ‘How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?’ Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, 07-051.

  • Cheney, G., J. Roper, and S. May: 2007, “Overview” in The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility, Edited by S. May, G. Cheney, and J. Roper (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. and D. Owen: 2007, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Accountability: The Missing Link”, Accounting, Organizational and Society 32(7-8), 649-667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D. and I. M. Gordon: 2001, ‘An Examination of Social and Environmental Reporting Strategies’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 14(5), 587–616.

  • CSRwire: 2006, Innovest Named #1 Provider of ‘Extra-Financial Research by Thomson Extel” July 21, http://www.csrwire.com/News/5980.html. Last accessed 1 Oct 2009

  • Deegan, C.: 2002, “The Legitimacy Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures-A Theoretical Foundation”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 15(3), 282-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenburg, S., T. Green and H. Erekson: 2003, “Approaching Socially Responsible Investment with a Comprehensive Ratings Scheme: Total Social Impact”, Journal of Business Ethics 43, 167-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R.E. and S.R. Velamuri: 2006, “A New Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: Company Stakeholder Responsibility”, Edited by A. Kakabadse, and M. Morsing: Corporate Social Responsibility: Reconciling Aspiration with Application, EABIS, (Palgrave MacMillan, New York), 9-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G. and J. Wang: 1994, “The Fortune Corporate ‘Reputation’ Index: Reputation for What?” Journal of Management 20(1), 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, C.: 2005, “Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life-Cycle Assessment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 59:199-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss: 1965, “Discovery of Substantiative Theory: A Basic Strategy Underlying Qualitative Research”, American Behavioral Scientist 8(5), 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, T.: 2005, ‘Measuring Corporate Sustainability Performance and Its Impact on Corporate Financial Performance’, Applied Research in Environmental Economics 31, 51–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., D. Owen, and C. Adams: 1996, “Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate and Social Reporting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (7-8): 649-666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J. and Mahon, J. F.: 1997, “The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate” Business and Society, 36 (1): 5-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G.: 1968, “The tragedy of the Commons” Science 162, 1243-1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igalens, J. and J.P. Gond: 2005, “Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A Critical and Empirical Analysis of ARESE Data”, Journal of Business Ethics 56, 131-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H.: 2003, “Financial Analysts, Firm Quality, and Social Responsibility”, The Journal of Behavioral Finance 4(3), 172-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., E. R. Smith and L. H. Kidder: 1991, Research Methods in Social Relations (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Fort Worth)

  • Kagel, J.H. and A.E. Roth: 1995, The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempf, A. and P. Osthoff: 2007, “The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance” European Financial Management 13(5), 908-922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, M.J.: 2005, “Corporate Social Responsibility – the Investor’s Perspective” in Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’s Leading Companies Edited by John Hancock (Kogan Page Limited, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel, I.: 2001, “Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index: A Global Benchmark for Corporate Sustainability” Corporate Environmental Strategy, April, 2001, 6-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S. and S. Maklan: 2004, “Corporate Social Responsibility: Moving Beyond Investment Towards Measuring Outcomes”, European Management Journal, 22(5), 508-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. and J. Ueng: 2005, “Evaluating the Evaluators: Should Investors Trust Corporate Governance Metrics Ratings?”, Journal of Management and Governance 9, 111-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulshreshtha, P.: 2007, “Economics, Ethics and Business Ethics: A Critique of Interrelationships” International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3(1), 33-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. K.: 1994, ‘The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure’, Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.

  • MacKinlay, A. C.: 1997, ‘Event Studies in Economics and Finance’, Journal of Economic Literature XXXV(1), 13–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P.: 2003, “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business” Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquez, A. and C. J. Fombrun: 2005, “Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility”, Corporate Reputation Review 7(4), 304-308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, J.E. and S.L. Berman: 2006, “Measurement of Corporate Social Action: Discovering Taxonomy in Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Ratings Data”, Business and Society, 45(1), 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.A.: 2004, “Using Qualitative Methods for Causal Explanation”, Field Methods, 16 (3); 243-264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell,, J.A.: 2009, “Designing and Qualitative Study” in The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods Second Edition. Editors L. Bickman and D. Rob (Sage Publications London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J.: 2002 Reinventing the Bazaar: a natural history of markets (Norton, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., L. Buys and J. Summerville: 2007, “Quantifying the Social Dimension of Triple Bottom Line: Development of a Framework and Indicators to Assess the Social Impact of Organizations” International Journal of Governance and Ethics 3(3), 223-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B.: 2002, “Managerial Perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosure: An Irish Story”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 15(3), 406-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., F.L. Schmidt, and S.L. Rynes: 2003, “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oulton, W. and J. Hancock: 2005, “Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility”, in Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’s Leading Companies Edited by John Hancock. (Kogan Page Limited, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategic Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason: 2005, ‘Rethinking the Social Responsibility of Business’, October, pp. 29–37

  • Reich, R.B.: 2007 Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy and Everyday Life (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G.R., I.C. Harris, A.A. Cannella, Jr., and T. Francolini: 2003, “In Search of Meaning: Does the Fortune Reputation Survey Alter Performance Expectations?”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 20(3), 187-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalet, S.: 2003, “Fitting the People they are Meant to Serve: Reasonableness in the American Legal System”, Law and Philosophy 22, 75-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalet, S.: 2006, “Prisoner’s Dilemmas, Cooperative Norms, and Codes of Business Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, Spring 65, 309-323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, H.: 2005, ‘International Corporate Social Responsibility Rating Systems’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 20, 107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. and T. Kohers: 2002, “The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry” Journal of Business Ethics 35, 97-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M. A.: 2008, ‘Socially Responsible Investment and Pro-Social Change’, Journal of Economic Issues 42, 51–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Stovall, O.S., J.D. Neill and B. Reid: 2006, “Institutional Impediments to Voluntary Ethics Measurement Systems”, Journal of Business Ethics 66, 169-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., F. Perrini and S. Pogutz: 2004, “New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics 53, 173-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist: 2008, ‘Just Good Business: A Special Report on Corporate Social Responsibility’, January 19, pp. 1–24

  • Tregidga, H. and M.J. Milne: 2003, “From Sustainable Management to Sustainable Development: A Longitudinal Analysis of External Communication by a Leading Environmental Reporter”, Business Strategy and the Environment 15(4), 219-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.: 2008, ‘Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility’, Academy of Management Perspectives 22, 87–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A.: 2003, “The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments”, Journal of Business Ethics 43, 233-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisebrod, J.: 2007, “Social Impact Ratings: How to Make Responsible Investment Appealing”, Finance and the Common Good/Bien Common 27(2), 29-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.J.: 1991, “Corporate Social Performance Revisited”, Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691-718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K.: 2003, Case Study Research: Design and Methods Third Edition, (Sage Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Scalet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scalet, S., Kelly, T.F. CSR Rating Agencies: What is Their Global Impact?. J Bus Ethics 94, 69–88 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0250-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0250-6

Key words

Navigation