Skip to main content
Log in

Developing and Maintaining Ethical Competence

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Choice in Dying. Legislative update. Right to die law digest. 1996; (June).

  2. Quill v Vacco, 80 F. 3d 716 (2d Cir 1996).

  3. Compassion in Dying v Washington, 79 F. 3d 790 (9th Cir 1996).

  4. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995; 274:1591–98.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asch D. The role of critical care nurses in euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996; 334:1374–79.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scanlon C. Nursing ethics: Understanding the moral life. Journal of New York State Nurses Association. 1995; 26:16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scanlon C. Survey yields significant results. Communique (ANA publication). 1994; 4:1–3.

  8. Scanlon C, Fleming C. Nurses come together to face ethical issues. Health Progress. 1987; (Dec.):46–48, 52.

  9. American Nurses Association. Code for nurses with interpretive statements. Kansas City, MO. ANA; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Nurses Association. Position statement on nursing and the patient self-determination act. Washington, DC. ANA; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. American Nurses Association. Position statement on promotion of comfort and relief of pain in dying patients. Washington, DC. ANA; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. American Nurses Association. Position statement on foregoing medically provided nutrition and hydration. Washington, DC. ANA; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Nurses Association. Position statement nursing care and do-not-resuscitate decisions. Washington, DC. ANA; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Nurses Association. Position statement on assisted suicide. Washington, DC. ANA; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. American Nurses Association. Position statement on active euthanasia. Washington, DC. ANA; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scanlon C, Fibison W. Managing genetic information: Implications for nursing practice. Washington, DC. American Nurses Publishing; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scanlon, C. Developing and Maintaining Ethical Competence. HEC Forum 9, 85–92 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008825614947

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008825614947

Keywords

Navigation