Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T04:18:54.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Normative realism and ontology: reply to Clarke-Doane, Rosen, and Enoch and McPherson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

T. M. Scanlon
T. M. Scanlon*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
*
E-mail: scanlon@fas.harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In response to comments on my book, Being Realistic about Reasons, by Justin Clarke-Doane, David Enoch and Tristram McPherson, and Gideon Rosen, I try to clarify my domain-based view of ontology, my understanding of the epistemology of normative judgments, and my interpretation of the phenomenon of supervenience.

Keywords

Normative realismmoral realismontology supervenience
Type
Tim Scanlon's Being Realistic about Reasons; author meets critics
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , 2017 , pp. 877 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berker, Selim. 2014. “Does Evolutionary Psychology Show that Normativity is Mind-Dependent?” In Moral Psychology and Human Agency, edited by D’Arms, Justin and Jacobson, Daniel, 215–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717812.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph. 1956. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” In Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, 205–221. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clarke-Doane, Justin. 2017. “Objectivity and Reliability.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, David, and McPherson, Tristram. 2017. “What do you mean.”Google Scholar
Koellner, Peter. 2009. “Truth in Mathematics: The Question of Pluralism.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics, edited by Bueno, Otávio and Linnebo, Øystein, 80–116. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, John. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 2011. Vol. 2 of On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V., and Goodman, Nelson. 1947. “Steps Toward a Constructive Nominalism.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 12: 105–122.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 2017. “Scanlon’s Modal Metaphysics.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 2014. Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678488.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127: 109–166. 10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, W. W. 2005. The Provenance of Pure Reason: Essays in the Philosophy of Mathematics and Its History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar