Skip to main content
Log in

A Critique of Atkins' Periodic Kindom and Some Writings on Electronic Structure

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article consists of a critique of the writings of Peter Atkins. The topics discussed include the quantum mechanical explanation of the periodic system, the aufbau principle and the order of occupation of orbitals by electrons. It is also argued that Atkins fails to appreciate the philosophical significance of the more general version of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and that this omission has ramifications in the popular presentation of chemistry as well as chemical education and philosophy of chemistry in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • P.W. Atkins, The Periodic Kingdom, New York, NY: Basic Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.W. Atkins and R.S. Friedman, Molecular Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Oxford: University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Bills, Experimental 4s and 3d Energies in Atomic Ground States. Journal of Chemical Education 75: 589–593, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.L. Brown, H.E. LeMay and B.E. Bursten, Chemistry: The Central Science, 7th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Fricke, Superheavy Elements. Structure and Bonding (Berlin) 21: 89–144, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kais, M. Sung and D.R. Herschbach, Large-Z and-N Dependence of Atomic Energy from Renormalization of the Large Dimension Limit. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 49: 657–674, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Latter, Atomic Energy Levels for the Thomas-Fermi and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac Potential. Physical Review 99: 510–519, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.P. Melrose and E.R. Scerri, Why Is the 4s Orbital Filled before the 3d. Journal of Chemical Education 74: 498–503, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.G. Nelson, Relative Energies of 3d and 4s Orbitals. Education in Chemistry 29: 84–85, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.G. Nelson, How Do Electrons Get Across Nodes?. Journal of Chemical Education 67: 643–647, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J.J. Norrby, Why is Mercury Liquid?. Journal of Chemical Education 68: 110–113, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Pilar, 4s Is Always Above 3d!. Journal of Chemical Education 55: 2–6, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Pyykkö, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. Advances in Quantum Chemistry 11: 353, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. Scerri, Transition Metal Configurations and Limitations of the Orbital Approximation. Journal of Chemical Education 66: 481–483, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. Scerri, How Good is the Quantum Mechanical Explanation of the Periodic System? Journal of Chemical Education 75: 1384–1385, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Schwinger, Thomas-Fermi Model: The Leading Correction. Physical Review A 22: 1827–1832, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Silberberg, Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.G. Vanquickenborne, K. Pierloot and D.J. Devoghel. Transition Metals and the Aufbau Principle. Journal of Chemical Education 71: 469–471, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scerri, E.R. A Critique of Atkins' Periodic Kindom and Some Writings on Electronic Structure. Foundations of Chemistry 1, 295–303 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009906513673

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009906513673

Keywords

Navigation