Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ageism in science: Fair-play between generations

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of age in scientific practice from an ethical perspective. In social perception, people tend to categorise others rather automatically along three major dimensions: race, sex, and age.1 Much empirical and theoretical attention has been devoted to the study of racism and sexism, but comparatively little research in the social and behaviural sciences has been directed at understanding what some refer to as the third ‘-ism’: ageism.2 For a serious understanding of the implications of ageism in science, it is necessary to discuss, first, the conflicting relationships between classical and modern concepts of time and calendar age, and thereafter the concept of ageism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kunda, Z. (1999) Social cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow, G.M. & Smith, P.A. (1979) Aging, ageism, and society. West Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schroots, J.J.F. & Birren, J.E. (1988) The nature of time: Implications for research on aging, Comprehensive Gerontology C, 2: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Back, K.W. (1995) Age norms. In G.L. Maddox (Ed.) The encyclopedia of aging (pp.36–37), Springer Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schaie, K.W. (1996) Intellectual development in adulthood: The Seattle Longitudinal Study, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson, T.D. (Ed.)(2002) Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cuddy, A.J.C. & Fiske, S.T. (2002) Doddering but dear: Process, content, and function in stereotyping of older persons. In T.D. Nelson (Ed.) Ageism. Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greenberg, J., Schimel, J. & Mertens, A. (2002) Ageism: Denying the face of the future. In T.D. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism. Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin, D.C., Rahhal, T.A. & Poon, L.W. (1998) Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best, Memory & Cognition 26: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schroots, J.J.F. (2003) Life-course dynamics: A research program in progress from The Netherlands, European Psychologist 8 (in press).

  11. Wisensale, S.K. (1988) Generational equity and intergenerational policies, The Gerontologist, 28: 773–778.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drenth, P.J.D. (2002) The dangers of resource myopia: A plea for integration. Paper presented at the XXVth International Congress of Applied Psychology, Singapore, July 7–12, 2002.

  13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994) The new production of knowledge, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ALLEA/ All European Academies and Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Johannes J. F. Schroots

Authors
  1. Johannes J. F. Schroots
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes J. F. Schroots.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schroots, J.J.F. Ageism in science: Fair-play between generations. SCI ENG ETHICS 9, 445–451 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0043-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0043-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation