Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared?

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prenatal care and the practice of prenatal genetic testing are about to be changed fundamentally. Due to several ground-breaking technological developments prenatal screening and diagnosis (PND) will soon be offered earlier in gestation, with less procedure-related risks and for a profoundly enlarged variety of targets. In this paper it is argued that the existing normative framework for prenatal screening and diagnosis cannot answer adequately to these new developments. In concentrating on issues of informed consent and the reproductive autonomy of the pregnant women the ethical debate misses problems related to the clinical pathway as a whole and to implicit normative attributions to clinical actions or the function of health care professionals. If, however, ethical debate would focus on the clinical context and on the ends of PND to a larger extent, it would be able to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the ethical challenges especially of the new technologies in order to be more adequately prepared for their implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. McGraw-Hill Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine 2002.

References

  • Buchanan, A., D.W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From chance to choice. Genetics & Justice. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 2003. The fetus as a patient: An essential concept for the ethics of perinatal medicine. American Journal of Perinatology 20(8): 399–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, L.S., C.E. van der Schoot, S. Hahn, and N.D. Avent. 2008. SAFE—the special non-invasive advances in fetal and neonatal evaluation network: aims and achievements. Prenatal Diagnosis 28(2): 83–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R.W., R. Akolekar, Y.W. Zheng, T.Y. Leung, H. Sun, K.C. Chan, et al. 2011. Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: Large scale validity study. BMJ 342: c7401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R.G. 1972. Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders: Trials and tribulations. Clinical Chemistry 18(3): 179–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deans, Z., and A. Newson. 2011. Should non-invasiveness change informed consent procedures for prenatal diagnosis? Health Care Analysis 19(2): 122–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, A., W.J. Dondorp, C.E. de Die-Smulders, S.G. Frints, and G.M. de Wert. 2010. Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored. European Journal of Human Genetics 18(3): 272–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong A., W.J. Dondorp, S.G. Frints, C.E. de Die-Smulders, and G.M. de Wert. 2011a. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for aneuploidy:toward an integral ethical assessment. Human Reproduction 26(11): 2915–2917.

  • De Jong, A., W.J. Dondorp, S.G. Frints, C.E. de Die-Smulders, and G.M. de Wert. 2011b. Advances in prenatal screening: The ethical dimension. Nature Reviews Genetics 12: 657–663.

  • Dworkin, G. 1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt Jr, H.T. 1996. The foundations of bioethics, 2nd ed, 189–238. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT). 2010. Special report: prenatal screening policies in Europe. www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk. Accessed 6 Jan 2012.

  • Fan, H.C., Y.J. Blumenfeld, U. Chitkara, L. Hudgins, and S.R. Quake. 2008. Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(24): 16266–16271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, H.C., and S.R. Quake. 2010. In principle method for noninvasive determination of the fetal genome. Nature Precedings. doi:10.1038/npre.2010.5373.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Centre of Health Education (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, BZgA). 2006. Experience of pregnancy and prenatal diagnosis. Representative survey of pregnant women on the subject of prenatal diagnosis. http://www.bzga.de/?uid=54fef95d6f432e81cd0178d17b77b7d4&id=medien&sid=88&idx=1496. Accessed 2 Oct 2011.

  • Ferguson-Smith, M.E., M.A. Ferguson-Smith, N.C. Nevine, and A. Stone. 1971. Chromosome analysis before birth and its value in genetic counselling. BMJ 4(5779): 69–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M., and D. Lanzerath (Eds). 2004. Prädiktive gentests. “Health Purposes” und Indikationsstellung als Kriterien der Anwendung.

  • Greely, H.T. 2011. Get ready for the flood of fetal gene screening. Nature 469(7330): 289–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, S.D., and M.J. Khoury. 2006. What is the clinical utility of genetic testing? Genetics in Medicine 8(7): 448–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haker, H. 2008. Ethische Dimensionen in der Pränatalen Diagnostik. In Der Beratungsprozess in der Pränatalen Diagnostik, ed. D.C. Hürlimann, R. Baumann-Hölzle, and H. Müller, 43–68. Bern: Peter Lang.

  • Hofmann, B. 2003. Medicine as techne—A perspective from antiquity. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28(4): 403–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzerath, D. 2000. Krankheit und ärztliches Handeln. München: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y.M., K.C. Chan, H. Sun, E.Z. Chen, P. Jiang, F.M. Lun, et al. 2010. Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Science Translational Medicine 2(61): 61ra91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y.M., N.B. Tsui, R.W. Chiu, T.K. Lau, T.N. Leung, M.M. Heung, et al. 2007. Plasma placental RNA allelic ratio permits noninvasive prenatal chromosomal aneuploidy detection. Nature Medicine 13(2): 218–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manson, N.C., and O. O’Neill. 2007. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newson, A.J. 2008. Ethical aspects arising from non-invasive fetal diagnosis. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 13(2): 103–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. 2002. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. 2003. Some limits of informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 29(1): 4–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pippin, R.B. 1996. Medical practice and social authority. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21(4): 417–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5–6): 413–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, D., C. Netzer, and W. Henn. 2009. An offer you can’t refuse? Ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesemann, C. 2006. Von der Verantwortung, ein Kind zu bekommen. Eine Ethik der Elternschaft. München: C.H. Beck.

  • Wright, C. 2009. Cell-free fetal nucleic acids for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Report of the UK expert working group. PHG Foundation.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of History, Theory and Ethics in Medicine, RWTH University Aachen, Wendlingweg 2, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Dagmar Schmitz

Authors
  1. Dagmar Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagmar Schmitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitz, D. A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared?. Med Health Care and Philos 16, 357–364 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9411-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9411-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation