Skip to main content
Log in

A Plea For Monsters

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Abusch, Dorit: 1997, ‘Sequence of Tense and Temporal De Re’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R. and E. L. Keenan: 1985, ‘Deixis’, in M. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Grammatical Categories in the Lexicon, Cambridge University Press.

  • Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1975, ‘The First Person’, reprinted in Quassim Cassam (ed.), Self-Knowledge.

  • Banfield, Ann: 1982, Unspeakable Sentences (Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barentsen, Adrian: 1996, ‘Shifting Points of Orientation in Modern Russian: Tense Selection in “Reported Perception”’, in Theo Janssen and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Reported Speech.

  • Bäuerle, R.: 1983, ‘Pragmatisch-semantische Aspekte der NP-Interpretation’, in M. Faust et al. (eds.), Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie und Textlinguistik, Tübingen, pp. 121–131.

  • Benthem, J. van: 1978, ‘Tense Logic and Standard Logic’, Logique et Analyse 80, 47–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Patrick, M. de Rijke and Y. Venema: 2001: Modal Logic, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 53.

  • Boolos, George: 1984, ‘To Be is to Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables)’, Journal of Philosophy 81, 430–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler: 1974, ‘Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth’, The Journal of Philosophy 71(7), 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassam, Quassim (ed.): 1994, Self-Knowledge, Oxford University Press.

  • Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1966, ‘He: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness’, Ratio 7.

  • Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1967, ‘Indicators and Quasi-Indicators’, American Philosophical Quarterly 4(2).

  • Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1968, ‘On the Logic of Attributions of Self-Knowledge to Others’, The Journal of Philosophy 65(15).

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1989, ‘Anaphora and Attitudes De Se’, in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem and van Emde Boas (eds.), Language in Context, Foris, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, George N.: 1975, ‘The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse’, Journal of West African Languages 10, 141–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard: 1985, Tense, Cambridge University Press.

  • Cooper, Robin: 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Max: 1990, Entities and Indices, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, Paul: 2000, ‘Coreference and Representationalism’, in K. von Heusinger and U. Egli (eds.), Reference and Anaphoric Relations, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doron, Edit: 1991, ‘Point of View as a Factor of Content’, SALT I.

  • Farkas, Donka: 1997, ‘Evaluation Indices and Scope’, in Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope-Taking, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fintel, Kai von: 1997, ‘The Presupposition of Subjunctive Conditionals’, in Orin Percus and Uli Sauerland (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25.

  • Frajzyngier, Zygmunt: 1985, ‘Logophoric Systems in Chadic’, J. African Languages and Linguistics 7, 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: 1892, ‘Ñber Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, pp. 25–50. Reprinted in Frege, ‘Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung’, in G. Patzig (ed.), Göttingen (1986).

  • Haas-Spohn, Ulrike: 1995, Versteckte Indexikalität und subjektive Bedeutung, Studia Grammatica 38, Akademie Verlag.

  • Hagège, Claude: 1974, ‘Les Pronoms Logophoriques’, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69, 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Paul Platero: 1996, ‘Negative Polarity Expressions in Navajo’, ms., MIT.

  • Heim, Irene: 1991a, ‘Artikel und Definitheit’, in A. v. Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Handbuch der Semantik, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1991b, Class hand-outs on ‘Control’ (Seminar taught by Heim & Higginbotham, Spring 1991): ‘Interpretation of PRO’ (Feb. 22), ‘The First Person’ (March 8), and a hand-out on ‘Connectedness’ (April 12).

  • Heim, Irene: 1994a, ‘Puzzling Reflexive Pronouns in de se Reports’, hand-out, Bielefeld Conference, March.

  • Heim, Irene: 1994b, ‘Comments on Abusch's Theory of Tense’, in H. Kamp (ed.), Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, University of Amsterdam, pp. 143–170.

  • Heim, Irene: 2002, ‘Features of Pronouns in Semantics and Morphology’, hand-out of a talk given at USC on 01.13.02.

  • Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 2000, ‘Competence with Demonstratives’, to appear in B. Ramberg and M. Hahn (eds.), Festschrift for Tyler Burge.

  • Hyman, Larry M. (ed.): 1979, Aghem Grammatical Structure, Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 7.

  • Hyman, Larry M. and Bernard Comrie: 1981, ‘Logophoric Reference in Gokana’, Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, Sabine: 1994, ‘On the Contribution of Conditional Then’, Natural Language Semantics 2, 171–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, David and John Perry: 1996, ‘Where Monsters Dwell’, in Seligman and Westerståhl (ed.), Logic, Language and Computation Vol. 1.

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1999, ‘Towards a Variable-Free Semantics’, Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 117–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, Siegfried: 1971, Der Konjunktiv in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart, Max Hueber, Verlag.

  • Janssen, Theo and Wim van der Wurff (ed.): 1996, Reported Speech, John Benjamins.

  • Kadmon, Nirit: 2001, Formal Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: 1969, ‘Quantifying In’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: 1990, ‘Thoughts on Demonstratives’, in P. Yourgrau (ed.), Demonstratives, Oxford University Press.

  • Kaplan, David: 1977/1989, ‘Demonstratives’, in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press.

  • Kaplan, David: 1989, ‘Afterthoughts’, in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press.

  • Kaplan, David: 2001, ‘The Meaning of Ouch and Oops (Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use)’, Draft #3, ms., UCLA.

  • Kondrashov, D. and N. Kondrashova: 1999, ‘Double-Access Double-Decker: Where Semantics can get a Free Ride on Syntax’, hand-out, Thermi Conference on Tense, Aspect and Mood.

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1989, ‘Pronouns, Logical Variables, and Logophoricity in Abe’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1991, ‘Conditionals’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung.

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1997, ‘Impersonal Pronouns and Logophoricity’, Hand-out of a talk given at Sinn und Bedeutung – II, Berlin, December.

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1998, ‘More Structural Analogies between Pronouns and Tenses’, Proceedings of SALT VIII.

  • Kuhn, Steven: 1980, ‘Quantifiers as Modal Operators’, Studia Logica 39, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, Susumu: 1972, ‘Pronominalization, Reflexivization, and Direct Discourse’, Linguistic Inquiry 3(2): 161–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusumoto, Kiyomi: 1998, ‘Tenses as Logophoric Pronouns’, Handout of talk given at the MIT/UConn/UMass Semantics Workshop, October 31, 1998 (UConn).

  • Larson, Richard and G. Segal: 1995, Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory, MIT Press.

  • Leslau, Wolf: 1995, Reference Grammar of Amharic, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1979, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, The Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1983, 'Postscript to 'General Semantics'', in Philosophical Papers I, Oxford University Press.

  • Mitchell, Jonathan: 1986, The Formal Semantics of Point of View, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Jerry: 1970, ‘On the Criterion of Identity for Noun Phrase Deletion’, CLS 6.

  • Pan, Hai-Hua: 1997, Constraints on Reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese, Garland.

  • Partee, Barbara: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English’, J. Philosophy 70, 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’, Linguisics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1989, ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’, CLS 25.

  • Perry, John: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review 86.

  • Perry, John: 1979, ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs 13, 3–21. Reprinted in N. Salmon and S. Soames (eds.), Propositions and Attitudes, Oxford University Press (1988).

  • Predelli, Stefano: 1998, ‘Utterance, Interpretation and the Logic of Indexicals’, Mind and Language 13, 400–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, J. Philosophy 53.

  • Quine, W. V.: 1960, ‘Variables Explained Away’, reprinted in Quine, Selected Logic Papers, Harvard University Press (1995).

  • Recanati, François: 1993, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, ‘Point of View in Language – The Use of Parentheticals’, in Gisa Rauh (ed.), Essays on Deixis, Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1991, ‘Self-Representation’, Manuscript.

  • Roncador, Manfred von: 1988, Zwischen direkter und indirekter Rede, Niemeyer.

  • Rooth, Mats: 1996, ‘Focus’, in Lappin (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, Phlippe: 1999, Propositional Attitudes and Indexicality (A Cross-Categorial Approach), Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Scott, Dana: 1970, ‘Advice on Modal Logic’, in K. Lambert (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Logic. Recent Developments, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvit, Yael: 2001, ‘Hebrew “Past-under-Past” Sentences and the SOT Parameter’, Hand-out of a talk given at the Conference on the Syntax and Semantics of Semitic Languages, USC, May 4–5.

  • Speas, Peggy: 1999, ‘Person and Point of View in Navajo Direct Discourse Complements’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1975, ‘Indicative Conditionals’, Philosophia 5, 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1978, ‘Assertion’, in Syntax and Semantics,Vol.9, Academic Press.

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1981, ‘Indexical Belief’, Synthese 49.

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1999, Context and Content, Oxford University Press.

  • Stechow, Arnim von: 1982, ‘Structured Propositions’, Papier Nr. 59, SFB 99, Konstanz.

  • Stechow, Arnim von: 2001, ‘Schlenker's Monsters’, Hand-out of a Talk Given at UCLA, April 4th, 2001 (available at http://www2.sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de/arnim/Schlenkers.Monster.pdf)

  • Stechow, Arnim von: 2002, ‘Binding by Verbs: Tense, Person and Mood under Attitudes’, manuscript, Tübingen.

  • Stone, Matthew: 1997, ‘The Anaphoric Parallel between Modality and Tense’, IRCS Report 97-06, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Thomas, Elaine: 1978, A Grammatical Description of the Engenni Language, Summer Institute of Linguistics Publication Number 60.

  • Weinstein, Scott: 1974, ‘Truth and Demonstratives’, Noûs 8, 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Thomas Ede: 1991, ‘Kontextabhängigkeit’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlenker, P. A Plea For Monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 29–120 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022225203544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022225203544

Keywords

Navigation