Abstract
Every materially adequate explication of the concepts ``picture''and ``the pictorial'' has to appeal to syntactical properties.From the available definitions, a conception of syntax is extractedthat is applicable to symbol systems of any sort. Against thisbackground, it is shown that a non-semantical characterization ofthe pictorial is mandatory. Finally, specific syntactical featuresare explicated that recommend themselves as necessary conditions forthe application of the concept of a picture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bach, Kent: 1970, 'Part of What a Picture Is', British Journal of Aesthetics 10, 119-137.
Carnap, Rudolf: 1934, Logische Syntax der Sprache, Springer, Wien.
Carnap, Rudolf: 1937, The Logical Syntax of Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Elgin, Catherine Z.: 1983, With Reference to Reference, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
Goodman, Nelson: 1968, Languages of Art, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
Goodman, Nelson: 1988, 'Representation Re-presented', in: Goodman, Nelson and Catherine Z. Elgin, Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, Routledge, London, pp. 121-131.
Greenberg, Clement: 1960, 'Modernist Painting', in Forum Lectures, Voice of America, Washington, DC; reprinted in: 1993, Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume 4, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 85-93
Holmes, Wendy: 1986, 'Visual Art', in Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York and Amsterdam, pp. 1151-1158.
Lewis, Clarence Irving and Harold Langford: 1932, Symbolic Logic, The Appleton-Century Company, New York.
Lopes, Dominic: 1996, Understanding Pictures, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
McDonnell, Neil: 1983, 'Are Pictures Unavoidably Specific?', Synthese 57, 83-98.
Morris, Charles W.: 1971, Writings on the General Theory of Signs, Mouton, Den Haag and Paris.
Peirce, Charles S.: 1931-35, Collected Papers 1-6, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peirce, Charles S.: 1958, Collected Papers 7-8, ed. by Arthur W. Burks, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Posner, Roland: 1986, 'Syntactics', in Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York and Amsterdam, pp. 1042-1061.
Posner, Roland and Klaus Robering: 1997, 'Syntactics', in Posner, Roland et al. (eds), Semiotik. Fin Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur, 1. Teilband, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 14-83.
Sachs-Hombach, Klaus and Klaus Rehkämper (eds), 1999, Bildgrammatik. Interdisziplinäre Forschungen zur Syntax bildlicher Darstellungformen, Scriptum Verlag, Magdeburg.
Scholz, Oliver R.: 1991, Bild, Darstellung, Zeichen. Philosophische Theorien bildhafter Darstellung, Karl Alber, Freiburg and München.
Scholz, Oliver R.: 1993, 'When is a Picture?', Synthese 95, 95-106.
Tarski, Alfred: 1946, Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scholz, O.R. A Solid Sense Of Syntax. Erkenntnis 52, 199–212 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005517909905
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005517909905