Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary on “The Gladiator Sparrow: Ethical issues in behavioral research on captive populations of wild animals”

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Orlans, F. B., Beauchamp, T. L., Dresser, R., Morton, D.B. and Gluck, John P. (1998), The Human Use of Animals: Case Studies in Ethical Choice Oxford University Press, New York. Chapter1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kant, Immanuel (1785) Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals trans. Beck, L.W. (1959), Bobbs-Merrill Company. Indianapolis: p. 47.

  3. Regan, T. (1992) Treatment of Animals, in Becker, L. C. (ed) Encyclopedia of Ethics, Garland Publishing Company, (New York: pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bekoff, M. and Jamieson, Dale (1991) Reflective Ethology, Applied Philosophy and the Moral Status of Animals.in Perspectives in Ethology, vol. 9, Bateson P.P.G. and Klopfer, P. H. (ed) Plenum Press, New York:, p. 26, note 20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, Indiana University, USA

    Brian Schrag

Authors
  1. Brian Schrag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schrag, B. Commentary on “The Gladiator Sparrow: Ethical issues in behavioral research on captive populations of wild animals”. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 726–730 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0052-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0052-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation