Abstract
The point of departure in this article is the Danish debate about democracyin schools. This article presents a first step in a study of how the relationshipbetween democracy and education can be understood. A juxtaposition of thetwo concepts requires, first of all, an analysis of how the concept of democracyis used in the educational debate. In this article three models of democracy areapplied as an analytical framework: a liberal model (Hobbes, Locke, Kant, Rawls,Dworkin), a communitarian model (MacIntyre, Sandel, Nussbaum) and a communicative/deliberativemodel (Walzer, Benhabib, Taylor, Habermas). Numerous contradictions and tensionsbetween concepts of democracy and education can be found in such a juxtaposition,depending on which conception of democracy one chooses to apply. In this articleI discuss which conception affords us the most meaningful concept of democraticteaching. As an introduction, a brief historical overview of the interplay betweendemocracy and education in Danish school is provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benhabib, S.: 1992, Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Routledge, London/New York.
Bessettes, J.: 1980, ‘Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government’, in R.A. Goldwin and W.A. Schambra (eds.), How Democratic is the Constitution? American Enterprise Institute, Washington.
Dewey, J.: 1916/1966, Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, The Free Press, New York.
Dworkin, R.: 1985, A Matter of Principle, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Habermas, J.: 1991, Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik: Philosophische Aufsätze, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt aM.
Habermas, J.: 1992, Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt aM.
Habermas, J.: 1995, ‘Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls' Political Liberalism’, The Journal of Philosophy XCII, 3, 109–131.
Kant, I.: 1785/1965, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Felix Meiner, Hamburg.
Koch, H.: 1945/1981, Hvad er demokrati? Gyldendal, Copenhagen.
MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
MacIntyre, A.: 1990, Three Rival Versions of Moral Inquiry, Duckworth, London.
Neill, A.S.: 1963, Summerhill, Hart Publishing Co., New York.
Nussbaum, M.C.: 1986, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nussbaum, M.C.: 1992, ‘Virtue Reviewed: Habit, Passion, Reflection in the Aristotelian Tradition’, Times Literary Supplement, July 3.
Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, New York.
Rawls, J.: 1995, ‘Reply to Habermas’, The Journal of Philosophy XCII, 3, 132–180.
Ross, A.: 1946, Hvorfor demokrati? Munksgaard, Copenhagen.
Ross, A.: 1949, ‘Hvad er demokrati?’, in H. Koch and A. Ross (eds.), Nordisk Demokrati, Westerman, Copenhagen.
Sandel, M.J.: 1982, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Taylor, C.: 1975, Hegel, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Taylor, C.: 1990, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
von Braunmühl, E.: 1989, Antipädagogik: Studien zur Abschaffung der Erziehung, Beltz Verlag, Weinheim/Basel.
Walzer, M.: 1983, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, Basic Books, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schou, L.R. Democracy in Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20, 317–329 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011886727055
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011886727055