Abstract
On the background of the widely known and controversially discussed concept of sustainable development and the ever increasing influence of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) on social, environmental and economic issues, this article focuses on how NGOs, specialised in environmental protection and conservation issues, reacted to the holistic societal concept of sustainable development which aims at finding solutions not only to environmental, but also to social and economic issues. For this purpose, the article investigates whether and to what extent the sustainability concept has been adopted by three worldwide leading environmental conservation NGOs: Greenpeace International, WWF International and IUCN International. The research, conducted in early 2006, reveals that the three organisations integrated the sustainability concept to different degrees depending on the organisations’ dominant value set. The more an organisation is bound to the idea of environmental protection, the less it is inclined to adopt strategies stemming from the sustainability concept whose implicit value system contradicts a strong bio- or eco-centric position. This finding adds evidence to the assumption that the holistic sustainability concept is most likely to be reduced and adapted when addressed by a specialised societal actor such as an NGO. Such insight into the influence of value systems on the actual actions of pressure groups might also be valuable in the light of the ever increasing number of strategic partnerships between NGOs and the private sector. To be familiar with each others’ action-leading key assumptions can significantly contribute to establishing a sound basis for a fruitful and rewarding collaboration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrow, M.: 1998, Abschied vom Nationalstaat. Staat und Gesellschaft im Globalen Zeitalter (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt).
Altvater, E.: 1997, ‹Markt und Demokratie in Zeiten von Globalisierung und ökologischer Krise’, in E. Altvater, A. Brunnengräber, M. Haake and H. Walk (eds.), Vernetzt und verstrickt. Nicht-Regierungsorganisationen als gesellschaftliche Produktivkraft (Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster), pp. 239-256.
Altvater, E., A. Brunnengräber, M. Haake and H. Walk (eds.): 1997, Vernetzt und verstrickt. Nicht-Regierungsorganisationen als gesellschaftliche Produktivkraft (Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster).
Amis, J., T. Slack and C. R. Hinings: 2002, ‹Values and Organizational Change’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 38(4), 436-465.
Bätzing, W.: 2003, Die Alpen. Geschichte und Zukunft einer europäischen Kulturlandschaft (C.H. Beck, München).
Beck, R.N.: 1981, ‹Visions, values and strategies: changing attitudes and culture’, Academy of Management Executive 1, 33-41.
Boudon, R.: 2001, ‹Theories of Social Action’, in N. J. Smelser et al. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 54-58.
Brint, S. and J. Karabel: 1991, `Institutional Origins and Transformations: The Case of Amercian Community Colleges', in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 337–360.
Brühl, T.: 2005, ‹Vom Einfluss der NGOs auf die internationale Politik’, in A. Brunnengräber, A. Klein and H. Walk (eds.), NGOs im Prozess der Globalisierung. Mächtige Zwerge – umstrittene Riesen (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden), pp. 266-297.
Brunnengräber, A., A. Klein and H. Walk (eds.): 2005, NGOs im Prozess der Globalisierung. Mächtige Zwerge – umstrittene Riesen (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden).
Deler, J.-P.: 1998, ONG et développement: société, economique, politique (Karthala, Paris).
DiMaggio, P. and W. W. Powell: 1991, The New Insitutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Durkheim, E.: 1996, Über soziale Arbeitsteilung (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.).
Fowler, A.: 2000, The Virtuous Spiral. A Guide to Sustainability for NGOs in International Development (Earthscan Publications Ltd., London).
Gagliardi, P.: 1986, ‹The creation and change of organizational cultures’, Organizational Studies 7, 117-134.
Greenpeace: www.greenpeace.org. Accessed 2 February–8 May 2006.
Grunwald, A., R. Coenen, J. Nitsch, A. Sydow and P. Wiedeman (eds.): 2001, Forschungswerkstatt Nachhaltigkeit. Wege zur Diagnose und Therapie von Nachhaltigkeitsdefiziten (edition sigma, Berlin).
Habermas, J.: 1981,Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.).
Hasse, R. and G. Krücken: 1999, Neo-Institutionalismus (transcript Verlag, Bielefeld).
Heins, V.: 2002, Weltbürger und Lokalpatrioten. Eine Einführung in das Thema Nichtregierungsorganisationen (Leske & Budrich, Opladen).
Kopfmüller, J., V. Brandl, J. Jörissen, M. Paetau, G. Banse, R. Coenen and A. Grunwald (eds.): 2001, Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet: konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren (edition sigma, Berlin).
Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowan: 1977, `Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony', American Journal of Sociology 83(2), 340–363.
Münch, R.: 1982, Theorie des Handelns (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.).
Pant, N. P. and R. Lachman: 1998, ‹Value incongruity and strategic choice’, Journal of Management Studies 35(2), 195-210.
Parsons, T.: 1967, The structure of Social Action (Free Press, New York).
Preisendörfer, P.: 2005, Organisationssoziologie (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden).
Ronit, K. and V. Schneider (eds.): 2000, Private Organizations in Global Politics (Routledge, London).
The World Conservation Union (IUCN): The IUCN Programme 2005–2008: Many Voices, One Earth. http://www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/WCC-3rd-002.pdf. Retrieved 10 February 2006.
The World Conservation Union (IUCN): www.iucn.org. Accessed 8 February–9 May 2006.
Wahl, P.: 1997, ‹Mythos und Realität internationaler Zivilgesellschaft. Zu den Perspektiven globaler Vernetzung von Nicht-Regierungs-Organisationen’, in E. Altvater, A. Brunnengräber, M. Haake and H. Walk (eds.), Vernetzt und verstrickt. Nicht-Regierungsorganisationen als gesellschaftliche Produktivkraft (Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster), pp. 286-307.
World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our common future (Oxford, United Kingdom/New York, USA).
World Wild Fund for Nature (WWF): www.panda.org. Accessed 12 February–5 May 2006.
World Wild Fund for Nature (WWF): 2004, ‹Annual Report 2004’ (This is the only annual report in hard copy as it was not available on the internet).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scherrer, Y.M. Environmental Conservation NGOs and the Concept of Sustainable Development. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 3), 555–571 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0211-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0211-0