Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethics, Values, and Organizational Justice: Individuals, Organizations, and Beyond

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to advance our thinking about values and justice by studying the relationship between these constructs at the organizational level. We hypothesize that collective perceptions of moral values in organizational settings will influence collective perceptions of justice. Survey results from 619 individuals in 108 departments strongly support our hypothesis that collective values influence perceptions of both procedural and overall justice climate. We discuss these results, and their implications for thinking about relationships between moral values and justice at even higher levels of analysis such as society overall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, M. L. & Schminke, M. (2000). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural/interactional justice and overall fairness judgments. Presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto.

  • Ambrose, M., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, R. (1992). Short forms of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Psychological Reports, 71, 155–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N. (1990). Ethical managing: Rules and results. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1977). Organization: A guide to problems and practice. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cojuharenco, I., Patient, D., & Bashshur, M. R. (2011). Seeing the “forest” or the “trees” of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Shaw, J. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In J. D. Colquitt & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 113–152). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degoey, P. (2000). Contagious justice: Exploring the social construction of justice in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 51–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 646–718). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Justice (pp. 215–246). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: Distinguishing sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M. (2008). Perspectives on organizational justice: Concept clarification, social context integration, time and links with morality. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(2), 93–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtschlag, C., Morales, C. E., Masuda, A. D., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2013). Complementary person-culture fit and hierarchical career status. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, B. C., & Harold, C. M. (2009). Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1185–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1996). The ethics of management. Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). r wg : An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A., & Martens, M. L. (2009). The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice-criteria relationships: The formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1025–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandwalla, P. N. (1976/1977). Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7, 21–51.

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, A., & Cropanzano, R. (2009). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35, 564–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2008). Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, C., Budhwar, P., & Varma, A. (2012). Overall justice, work group identification and work outcomes: Test of moderated mediation process. Journal of World Business, 47, 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. L., & Mansfield, R. (1974). Relationships of perceptions of organizational climate to organizational structure, context, and hierarchical position. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 515–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrinjaquet, A., Furrer, O., Usunier, J., Cestre, G., & Valette-Florence, P. (2007). A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values. Journal or Research in Personality, 41, 820–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priesmuth, M., Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2013). Bad behavior in groups: The impact of overall justice climate and functional dependence on counterproductive work behavior in work units. Group and Organization Management, 38, 230–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D., Egri, C., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, et al. (2011). A twenty-first century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. A. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q. M., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30, 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q. M., & Williamson, I. O. (2012). Justice in self-managing teams: The role of social networks in the emergence of procedural justice climates. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., & Paddock, E. L. (2010). From justice events to justice climate: A multilevel temporal model of information aggregation and judgment. In B. Mannix, M. Neal, & E. Mullen (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Fairness and groups (pp. 239–267). Bingley: JAI Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M. (2001). Considering the business ethics: An exploratory study of the influence of organizational size and structure on individual ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. S. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1190–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Cropanzano, R., & Rupp, D. (2002). Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effect of organizational level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 881–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism–collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 85–119). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying of theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multi-method studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T., & Roberson, Q. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C., & Hanson, K. (1985). It’s good business. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. (1992). A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 123–151). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stackman, R. W., Pinder, C. C., & Connor, P. E. (2000). Values lost: Redirecting research on values in the workplace. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 37–54). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 6, 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, C., & Nyberg, A. (2008). Keeping your headcount when all about you are losing theirs: Downsizing, voluntary turnover rates, and the moderating role of HR practices. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, D. S., Caleo, S., Carpenter, N. C., Horner, M. T., & Bernerth, J. B. (2012). Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 776–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 41–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. R. (2008). Compassion, suffering and the self: A moral psychology of social justice. Current Sociology, 56, 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We want to thank an anonymous reviewer for the helpful comments and feedback in addressing this concern.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anke Arnaud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schminke, M., Arnaud, A. & Taylor, R. Ethics, Values, and Organizational Justice: Individuals, Organizations, and Beyond. J Bus Ethics 130, 727–736 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2251-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2251-3

Keywords

Navigation