Abstract
In order to build on the information that was obtained in the course of the first study, a follow-up survey was conducted first by phone and subsequently in a written form between August and October 2014. We contacted 1.858 hospitals in all of Germany for the follow-up survey by phone. In cases where a hospital had not participated in the first study, the willingness to participate in the follow-up survey was established in advance. The survey’s dispatch was ensured in the case of acceptance. The same structured survey was used as a research tool. The data of the first study and the follow-up survey were merged and evaluated. 654 surveys (response rate 35.2 %) could be evaluated altogether. Our survey by phone revealed that 912 hospitals in all of Germany have at least one form of clinical ethics consultation available. The health care ethics committee is the most frequently implemented structure of clinical ethics consultation. The implementation of clinical ethics consultation is dependent on sponsorship and hospital size. Recommendations to deliver structures of clinical ethics consultations (ZEKO 2006, AEM 2010) have a smaller influence on the implementation compared to the certification by KTQ respectively proCum Cert. The rate of implementation in regard to the structures of clinical ethics consultation has steadily increased for years. The establishment of clinical ethics consultation in German hospitals should be further promoted. It would be desirable further to develop suitable juridical regulations in order to implement clinical ethics consultation as well as structural parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AEM, Vorstand der Akademie für Ethik in der Medizin e.V. (2010). Standards für Ethikberatung in Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens. Ethik in der Medizin, 22, 149–153.
Bruns, F. (2012). Ethikberatung und Ethikkomitees in Deutschland. In A. Frewer, F. Bruns, & A. May (Eds.), Ethikberatung in der Medizin (pp. 19–32). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Dörries, A., & Hespe-Jungesblut, K. (2007). Die Implementierung Klinischer Ethikberatung in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage bei Krankenhäusern. Ethik in der Medizin, 19, 148–156.
Haupt, R. (2008). Ethik in der Medizin. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage an sächsischen Krankenhäusern zur Existenz und zur Arbeitsweise von Ethikkomitees und Ethikberatungen. Ärzteblatt Sachsen, 19, 196–198.
May, A. (2012). Professionalisierung und Standardisierung der Ethikberatung Organisationsformen—Prozesse—Modelle. In A. Frewer, F. Bruns, & A. May (Eds.), Ethikberatung in der Medizin (pp. 66–75). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
McLean, S. (2007). What and who are clinical ethics committees for? Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(9), 497–500.
Schochow, M., May, A. T., Schnell, D., & Steger, F. (2014). Wird Klinische Ethikberatung in Krankenhäusern in Deutschland implementiert? Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 139, 2178–2183.
Vollmann, J. (2008). Ethikberatung an deutschen Universitätskliniken. Empirische Ergebnisse und aktuelle Entwicklungen. In D. Groß, A. May, & A. Simon (Eds.), Beiträge zur Klinischen Ethikberatung an Universitätskliniken (pp. 31–47). Berlin: LIT.
ZEKO, Zentrale Ethikkommission bei der Bundesärztekammer. (2006). Stellungnahme der Zentralen Kommission zur Wahrung ethischer Grundsätze in der Medizin und ihren Grenzgebieten bei der Bundesärztekammer zur Ethikberatung in der klinischen Medizin. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 103(24), 1703–1707.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schochow, M., Schnell, D. & Steger, F. Implementation of Clinical Ethics Consultation in German Hospitals. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 985–991 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9709-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9709-2