Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

On Social Attribution: Implications of Recent Cognitive Neuroscience Research for Race, Law, and Politics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpreting the world through a social lens is a central characteristic of human cognition. Humans ascribe intentions to the behaviors of other individuals and groups. Humans also make inferences about others’ emotional and mental states. This capacity for social attribution underlies many of the concepts at the core of legal and political systems. The developing scientific understanding of the neural mechanisms used in social attribution may alter many earlier suppositions. However, just as often, these new methods will lead back to old conundrums. Cognitive neuroscience will not dispel the hard problems of social judgment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), the Supreme Court of the United States of America held that statements by a defendant can only be admitted if the prosecution can prove that the defendant intentionally waived their right to consult with a lawyer and to refrain from answering questions.

References

  • Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (1994). Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372(6507), 669–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Masicampo, E. J. (2010). Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal-culture interface. Psychological Review, 117(3), 945–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & Dewall, C. N. (2009). Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(2), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 100(9), 5497–5502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Ladavas, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007). Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(2), 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cikara, M., Farnsworth, R. A., Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). On the wrong side of the trolley track: Neural correlates of relative social valuation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(4), 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dally, J. M., Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2006). Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when. Science, 312(5780), 1662–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, C. T., Loewen, P. J., Schreiber, D., Simmons, A. N., Flagan, T., McElreath, R., et al. (2012). Neural basis of egalitarian behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(17), 6479–6483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(4), 1262–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (1998). Chimpanzee politics : Power and sex among apes (Rev. ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom evolves. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 510–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman, D. (2011). Incognito:The brains behind the mind. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., Mann, T., Harrison, B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Predicting persuasion-induced behavior change from the brain. Journal of Neuro Science, 30(25), 8421–8424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D. H. (1970). Historians’ fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Schreiber, D. (2008). Biology, politics, and the emerging science of human nature. Science, 322(5903), 912–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haran, U., Moore, D. A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2010). A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(7), 467–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. M. (1998). Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(1), 101–114; discussion 115–148.

  • Iacoboni, M., Lieberman, M. D., Knowlton, B. J., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Moritz, M., Throop, C. J., et al. (2004). Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline. Neuroimage, 21(3), 1167–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klin, A. (2000). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The social attribution task. J Child Psychology Psychiatry, 41(7), 831–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, N. D. (2008). Our Racist, Sexist Selves. (April 6, 2008). New York Times.

  • Kurzban, R. (2010). Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite: Evolution and the modular mind. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 98(26), 15387–15392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D., Hariri, A., Jarcho, J. M., Eisenberger, N. I., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2005). An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals. Nature Neuroscience, 8(6), 720–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2007). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., & Trouard, T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 98(20), 11832–11835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2010). fMRI lie detection fails a legal test. Science, 328(5984), 1336–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. J. (2006). Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: A diagnostic note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, J., Morikawa, T., Hartwig, J., Hanley, J., & Allen, N. (2004). “Machiavellian” intelligence as a basis for the evolution of cooperative dispositions. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., et al. (2000). Perfomance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 729–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 98(2), 676–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigoni, D., Kühn, S., Sartori, G., & Brass, M. (2011). Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: The brain minds whether we believe in free will or not. Psychological Science, 22(5), 613–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, D. (2000). Looking into their minds: Latency in survey response as determined by political sophistication, issue publics, and cognitive conflict. In Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

  • Schreiber, D. (2007). Political cognition as social cognition: Are we all political sophisticates? In A. Crigler, M. MacKuen, G. E. Marcus, & W. R. Neuman (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 48–70). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, D., & Iacoboni, M. (2005). Monkey see, monkey do: Mirror neurons, functional brain imaging, and looking at political faces. In American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September 2005.

  • Schreiber, D., & Iacoboni, M. (2012). Huxtables on the Brain: An fMRI study of race and norm violation. Political Psychology, 33(3), 307–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirer, W. R., Ryali, S., Rykhlevskaia, E., Menon, V., & Greicius, M. D. (2011). Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY:1991).

  • Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: Printed for A. Millar, A. Kincaid & J. Bell.

  • Tatum, B. D. (1999). “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” and other conversations about race. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohs, K. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychol Science, 19(1), 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central European University, Budapest, Hungary

    Darren Schreiber

Authors
  1. Darren Schreiber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren Schreiber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schreiber, D. On Social Attribution: Implications of Recent Cognitive Neuroscience Research for Race, Law, and Politics. Sci Eng Ethics 18, 557–566 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9381-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9381-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation