Abstract
De George's account of philosophical and theological approaches to business ethics presupposes a particular view of the logic of argumentation. This paper presents an alternative model for describing arguments that has been suggested by Stephen Toulmin. It uses this model to qualify De George's claim that philosophers are justified in their indifference to the work of theologians in business ethics.
Consider what you think justice requires, and decide accordingly. But never give your reasons; for your judgment will probably be right, but your reasons will certainly be wrong.
Lord Mansfield
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
David P. Schmidt is Assistant Director of Trinity Center for Ethics and Corporate Policy at Trinity Church. He is a former Director of Corporate Relations for DePaul University. He is presently completing a doctoral dissertation on Theological Arguments and Public Policy Issues at the University of Chicago Divinity School.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, D.P. Patterns of argument in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 5, 501–509 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380756
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380756