Skip to main content
Log in

Technology and culture and possibly vigilance too

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many have bowed before the recently acquired powers of ‘new technologies’. However, in the shift from tekhnē to tekhnologia, it seems we have lost human values. These values are communicative in nature as technological progress has placed barriers like distance, web pages and ‘miscellaneous extras’ between individuals. Certain values, like the interpersonal pleasures of rendering service, have been lost as their domain of predilection has for many become fully commercially oriented, dominated by the cadence of profitability. Though the popular cultures of the artificial have surged forth to deliver us from the twentieth century, they have enabled some very superfluous dreaming—Man has succumbed to the Godly role of simulating himself and creating other beings. Communication is replaced by machines, services are rendered via many automated devices, procreation has entered the public sphere, robots and entertainment agents educate our youth and mesmerising screen-integrating ‘forms of intelligence’ even think for us. As such, this so-called culture threatens the very values Man constructed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to guide himself into the future. But what if the phenomena mentioned just reflect our new values? The author presents an investigation into this cultural shift, its impact on human practices with regards the mind and the body and evokes some pros and cons of generally accepting the ‘Culture of the Artificial’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bostrom's article culminates in a "Table of Transhumanist Values", cf. Bostrom (2005), "Transhumanist Values", Journal of Philosophical Research, Special Supplement on ‘Ethical Issues for the Twenty-First Century’, p. 13.

  2. "The realm of posthuman values does not entail that we should forego our current values. The posthuman values can be our current values, albeit ones that we have not yet clearly comprehended. Transhumanism does not require us to say that we should favour posthuman beings or human beings, but that the right of way of favouring human beings is by enabling us to realise our ideals better and that some of our ideals may well be located outside the space of modes of being that are accessible to us with our current biological constitution". Cf. Bostrom N., ibidem, p. 8.

  3. Cf. Mukherjee S. (2007), “Dialogues from the Land of Love and Death”, AI & Society, n° 21, p. 122.

References

  • Bostrom N (2005) Transhumanist Values, Journal of Philosophical Research, Special Supplement on ‘Ethical Issues for the Twenty-First Century’, Charlottesville VA: The Philosophy Documentation Centre

  • Changeux J-P, Ricœur P (1998) La nature et le règle. Ce qui nous fait penser. Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Droit R-P (2005) “Dialoguer avec tous, et d’abord avec soi”, dossier ‘Disparition: Paul Ricœur, Philosophe de tous les dialogues’, Le Monde, 22–23 mai [Paul Ricœur died on the 20th of May]

  • Esquith S (2005) Technology and democratic political education: simulation vs. re-enactment, Society for Philosophy and Technology, The American Philosophical Association, Central Division Meeting, 27–30 April 2005 Chicago, Illinois

  • Jacques F (1979) Dialogiques, Recherches logiques sur le dialogue. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S (2007) Dialogues from the Land of Love and Death, AI and Society, No. 21, pp 121–140

  • Quine WVO (1960) Word and object. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt CTA (2005) Of robots and believing, minds and machines. Journal for artificial intelligence. Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt CTA (2007) Redesigning man?. In: Vermaas PE, Kroes P, Light A, Moore SA (eds) Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture, Springer Science, Dordrecht, pp 199–206 [an alternate account and goal of the research examined herein]

  • Schmidt CTA (2007) Future human intellect. speculations on the nature of knowledge transfer, ‘Keynote Address’ international conference entitled human being in contemporary philosophical conceptions, laboratory for philosophical anthropology research, faculty of philosophy and social technologies, Volgograd State University, Russia, May 28–31

  • Schmidt CTA, Kraemer F (2006) Robots, Dennett and THE Autonomous. A terminological investigation, minds and machines. Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Vol. 20 No. 1, Kluwer/Springer

  • Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, vol LIX No. 236

  • Warwick A (2004) I, Cyborg, University of Illinois Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. T. A. Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, C.T.A. Technology and culture and possibly vigilance too. AI & Soc 26, 371–375 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-011-0320-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-011-0320-z

Keywords

Navigation