This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Additional information
1. This article is a revised version of a “perspective paper,” from the viewpoint of a consumer advocate, prepared for a project on “Ethics and Values in Food Safety Decision-making,” sponsored by the Consumers Union Foundation, and funded by the National Science Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities. The revised version originally appeared at 40Food Drug Cosmetic Law Journal 66–76 (1985) (copyright © 1985 by Academic Press.
WILLIAM B. SCHULTZ has been attorney at Public Citizen Litigation Group in Washington, D.C. since 1976, where he has argued more than ten cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals and state appellate courts. He has been the principal attorney on two cases in the U.S. Supreme Court and has worked on several others. He has had substantial trial experience in federal court and at the Food and Drug Administration, and has testified in more than a dozen Congressional hearings on topics ranging from food safety and nuclear insurance to drug patents. He is Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University Law Center, on the Editorial Board ofFood, Drug, Cosmetic Law Journal, and served as a commissioner on the Congressional Commission on the Federal Drug Approval Process. He holds a law degree from the University of Virginia School of Law.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schultz, W.B. The bitter aftertaste of saccharin. Agric Hum Values 3, 83–90 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530534
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530534