Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teaching research ethics: Can web-based instruction satisfy appropriate pedagogical objectives?

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical tasks faced by researchers in science and engineering as they engage in research include recognition of moral problems in their practice, finding solutions to those moral problems, judging moral actions and engaging in preventive ethics. Given these issues, appropriate pedagogical objectives for research ethics education include (1) teaching researchers to recognize moral issues in their research, (2) teaching researchers to solve practical moral problems in their research from the perspective of the moral agent, (3) teaching researchers how to make moral judgments about actions, and (4) learning to engage in preventive ethics. If web-based research ethics education is intended to be adequate and sufficient for research ethics education, then it must meet those objectives. However there are reasons to be skeptical that it can.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wallace, James D. (1996) Ethical Norms, Particular Cases. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harris, C.E. Jr., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M.J. (1995) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 2 nd Edition, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. & Ferguson, T.J. (2004) Virtue Ethics and the Practice of History: Native Americans and Archaeologists Along the San Pedro Valley of Arizona, Journal of Social Archaeology 4(1): 5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Capron, A.M. (1999) Ethical and Human-rights Issues in Research on Mental Disorders that May Affect Decision-making Capacity, New England Journal of Medicine 340: 1430–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arras, John D. (1994) Principles and Particularity: The Role of Cases in Bioethics, Indiana Law Journal 69: 983–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beauchamp, Thomas L., & Childress, James F. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Fifth edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bebeau, M. (1994) Influencing the Moral Dimensions of Dental Practice, in Rest, J.R., & Narvaez, D., eds. Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hampshire, Stuart (1949) Fallacies in Moral Philosophy, Mind 58: 466–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Neill, Onora. (2001) Practical Principles and Practical Judgment, Hastings Center Report 31, No. 4: 15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitbeck, Caroline (1995) Teaching Ethics to Scientists and Engineers: Moral Agents and Moral Problems, Science and Engineering Ethics, 1: (3) 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, Joshua (1993) Moral Pluralism and Moral Consensus in Copp, D., Hampton, J. & Roemer, J. E. eds. The Idea of Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jonsen, A.R. & Toulmin, S. (1998) The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Whitbeck, Caroline (1998) Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamin, M. (1990) Splitting the Difference: Compromise and Integrity in Ethics and Politics, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wong, D. (1992) Coping with Moral Ambiguity, Ethics 102: 763–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Swazey, J. & Bird, S.J. (1997) Teaching and Learning Research Ethics, in Elliott, D., & Stern, J.E., eds., Research Ethics: A Reader, University Press of New England, Hanover, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pritchard, Michael S. (1998) Sidgwick’s Practical Ethics, International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12:2, pp. 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Toulmin, S. (1981) The Tyranny of Principles, The Hastings Center Report, December, 1981: pp 31–39

  19. Toulmin, S. (1982) How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 25: 736–750

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jonsen, A. (1986) Casuistry and Clinical Ethics, Theoretical Medicine 7: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arras, J. (1991) Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16: pp. 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benjamin, M. (2001) Between Subway and Spaceship: Practical Ethics at the Outset of the Twenty-first Century Hastings Center Report 31, No. 4: 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Little, M. (2001) On Knowing the ‘Why’: Particularism and Moral Theory; Hastings Center Report, 31: No. 4: 32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Callahan, D., & Bok, S., eds. (1980) Ethics Teaching in Higher Education, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schrag, B. (2002) Changing the Culture of Science: Teaching Research Ethics to Graduate Students and Post-doctoral Fellows. Monograph Series of the Center for the Study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University. Vol. XIV No. 3 April, 2002.

  26. Schrag, B. ed. (1997–2005) Research Ethics: Cases and Commentaries, Vol 1–7, Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pimple, Kenneth D. (2005) Ethics at the Interface: A Successful Online Seminar, Commentary on “Some reflections on teaching health care ethics on the web” (T. Schonfeld), Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 481–494.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Woodburn, Laura (2002) Scientist and Subjects: An Internet-based seminar on the Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. Summary Process Evaluation: 2001–2002, October 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Schrag Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schrag, B. Teaching research ethics: Can web-based instruction satisfy appropriate pedagogical objectives?. SCI ENG ETHICS 11, 347–366 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0004-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0004-5

Keywords

Navigation