Skip to main content
Log in

When is a picture?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Philosophical discussions of depiction sometimes suffer from a lack of differentiation between several questions concerning the ‘nature’ of pictorial representation. To provide a suitable framework I distinguish six such questions and several levels on which one might want to proceed in order to answer some of them. With this background, I reconstruct Goodman's and Elgin's answer to the specific question: ‘What distinguishes the pictorial from the verbal or linguistic?’ I try to reveal some major motivations behind their system-oriented approach and to indicate some reasons why a strategy of this kind is to a certain extent mandatory to grasp the ‘nature of the pictorial’. The system-relative and functional character of depiction has to be captured by every adequate theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, M.: 1972, ‘How Do Pictures Represent?’, in E. H. Gombrich, J. Hochberg, and M. Black (eds.),Art, Perception and Reality, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 95–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlish, S.: 1982, ‘What Makes my Image of Him into an Image of Him?’, in W. Leinfellner et al. (eds.),Languages and Ontology (Proceedings of the Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium), Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien, pp. 222–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, C. Z.: 1983,With Reference to Reference, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1968,Languages of Art, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1972,Problems and Projects, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1978,Ways of Worldmaking, Harvester Press, Hassocks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1984,Of Mind and Other Matters, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. and C. Z. Elgin: 1988,Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, Harvester Press, Hassocks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, O. R.: 1991,Bild, Darstellung, Zeichen. Philosophische Theorien bildhafter Darstellung, Karl Alber, Freiburg/München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R.: 1975, ‘Representation and Resemblance’,The Philosophical Forum 7, 499–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R.: 1980, ‘Imagery’,Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R.: 1985, ‘The Power of Pictures’,The Journal of Philosophy 82, 711–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, R.: 1969, ‘Depicting’,Philosophy 44, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, K. L.: 1974, ‘Are Representations Symbols?’,The Monist 58, 236–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scholz, O.R. When is a picture?. Synthese 95, 95–106 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064669

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064669

Keywords

Navigation