We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
A number of recent papers have discussed the episode at Odyssey 10.156–72 in which Odysseus, on the third morning after landing on Circe's island, sees, kills, and transports a huge stag whose meat revives his men, who are exhausted in both body and spirit. Since the incident does not advance the main action, it invites interpretation, particularly since it is so richly elaborated. Naturally, it has received several: that the stag should be understood as a transformed human, and thus prefigures the rest of the episode; that the incident marks the liminality of Odysseus, who is about to lose some of his manhood in remaining for a year on the island; that the stag derives from the magical animal which, in folktale, often leads the hero into the Otherworld or the Underworld; and that it serves, both within its immediate context and within the narrative as told to the Phaeacians, as a figure for heroic action, removed from the battlefield and rendered ‘urbane’ by its emphasis on the cleverness with which Odysseus transports the dead animal rather than on the actual killing. I would like to point to a completely different aspect of the episode and to suggest that although some of these studies may be true pointers to its origin, its function within the narrative is straightforward and does not in itself demand such elaborate interpretation: the incident with the stag belongs to a series of incidents that test the ability of Odysseus and his crew to obtain meat, and so develop central themes of feasting, social order, and leadership.
1 Roessel, D., ‘The Stag on Circe's Island: An Exegesis of a Homeric Digression’, TAPA 119 (1989), 31–6.Google Scholar
2 Birge, D., ‘Ambiguity and the Stag Hunt in Odyssey 10’, Helios 20 (1993), 17–28.Google Scholar
3 Alexander, C., ‘A Note on the Stag: Odyssey 10.156–72’, CQ 41 (1991), 520'4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Schmoll, E. A., ‘Odysseus and the Stag: The Parander’, Helios 14 (1987), 22–8.Google Scholar
5 A. Heubeck in Heubeck, A., Hoekstra, A., A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey II. Books IX–XVI (Oxford, 1989), on 162–5.Google Scholar
6 Jones, P. V., Homer's Odyssey: a Companion to the Translation of Richmond Lattimore (Carbondale and Edwardsville, 1988) 93Google Scholar (on 10.140–88), notes the parallels.
7 Heubeck on 174–7 suggests that he means to surprise his men, which is quite possible; Beck, G., ‘Zur Kirke-Episode in der Odyssee’, Philologus 109 (1965), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Griffin, J., Homer on Life and Death (Oxford, 1980), 14–19Google Scholar; Murray, O., ‘The Symposium as Social Organization’, in Hagg, R. (ed.), The Greek Renaissance of the Eighth Century B.C.: Tradition and Innovation (Stockholm, 1983), 195–9Google Scholar. Whitley, J., Style and Society in Dark Age Greece: The Changing Face of a Pre-literate Society 1100–700 b.c. (Cambridge, 1991), 184–6Google Scholar, discusses Dark Age settlements as ‘Big Man’ societies centring on feasting halls.
9 There is a full treatment of hunting similes in Lonsdale, S., Creatures of Speech: Lion, Herding, and Hunting Similes in the Iliad (Stuttgart, 1990), 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 On the absence of sacrifice in the Apologos, see Vidal-Naquet, P., ‘Land and Sacrifice in the Odyssey: A Study of Religious and Mythical Meanings’, The Black Hunter: Forms of Thought and Forms of Society in the Greek World, trans. Szegedy-Maszak, A. (Baltimore, 1983), 15–38.Google Scholar
11 Murray, O., ‘War and the Symposium’, in Slater, W. J. (ed.), Dining in a Classical Context (Ann Arbor, 1991), 83–103Google Scholar, stresses the importance of shared drinking in military societies. In Homer, clearly, meat is at least as important as wine.
12 The Sirens, with their destructive singing, could also be said to provide a ‘bad feast,’ since the feast is the main occasion for the pleasure of song (1.325–7, 4.17–18, 8.62–83, 22.350–3). On the adventures' juxtaposition of the different extremes of bad hospitality, see Redfield, J., ‘The Economic Man’, in Rubino, C. and Shelmerdine, C. (edd.), Approaches to Homer (Austin, 1983), 218–47Google Scholar, esp. 237–42; Most, G., ‘The Structure and Function of Odysseus' Apologoi’, TAPA 119 (1989), 15–30.Google Scholar
13 Saïd, S., ‘Les crimes des prétendants, la maison d'Ulysse et les festins de l'Odyssée’, Études de la littérature ancienne (Paris, 1979), 9–49Google Scholar; Lateiner, D., ‘The Suitors' Take: Manners and Power in Ithaka’, Colby Quarterly 29 (1993), 173–96.Google Scholar
