Putting positrons into classical Dirac field theory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.10.003Get rights and content

Abstract

One way of arriving at a quantum field theory of electrons and positrons is to take a classical theory of the Dirac field and then quantize. Starting with the standard classical field theory and quantizing in the most straightforward way yields an inadequate quantum field theory. It is possible to fix this theory by making some modifications (such as redefining the operators for energy and charge). Here I argue that we ought to make these modifications earlier, revising the classical Dirac field theory that serves as the starting point for quantization (putting positrons into that theory and removing negative energies). Then, quantization becomes straightforward. Also, the physics of the Dirac field is made more similar to the physics of the electromagnetic field and we are able to better understand electron spin.

Introduction

In physics, classical Dirac field theory has not received the attention that it deserves. There are a number of reasons why. One reason is that, unlike our classical theory of the electromagnetic field, classical Dirac field theory does not provide an accurate description of macroscopic physics. That is because classical Dirac field theory does not emerge as a classical limit from our quantum theory of the Dirac field.1 Another reason is that—because the Dirac field operators in the quantum field theory anticommute—the classical Dirac field is sometimes treated as Grassmann-valued. Grassmann numbers are somewhat odd mathematical devices that are generally unfamiliar to physicists before encountering their use in the path integral formulation of quantum field theory for fermionic fields (like the Dirac field). A third reason that classical Dirac field theory has been neglected is that the equations of the theory were initially given an entirely different interpretation by Dirac and others. On this alternative interpretation, the equations are viewed as part of a relativistic quantum theory for a single electron.

Classical Dirac field theory is worthy of study because of the foundational role it plays in quantum field theory. Quantum electrodynamics (the quantum field theory that describes photons, electrons, and positrons) can be arrived at by quantizing the classical electromagnetic and Dirac fields. If we set aside interactions between these two fields (as we will do throughout this paper), then we can describe this procedure as separately quantizing classical electromagnetism in order to get a quantum theory of the electromagnetic field (a quantum field theory for photons) and quantizing classical Dirac field theory in order to get a quantum theory of the Dirac field (a quantum field theory for electrons and positrons).2

The process of quantizing the Dirac field is not smooth. One must make various modifications on the way to quantum field theory, such as redefining the operators for energy and charge. In this paper, I will argue that the reason these modifications are necessary is that we start with a classical theory of electrons (where the energy is not necessarily positive) and are then somehow trying to get out a quantum field theory of electrons and positrons (without negative energies). With the right modifications, this can be done. But, the quantization is much smoother if we go back and revise the classical Dirac field theory that serves as the starting point for quantization—putting positrons into the theory and removing negative energies.

The revised picture of quantization put forward here modifies the starting point but leaves the endpoint essentially unchanged. The goal is not to make any alterations to quantum field theory, but to improve our understanding of the foundations of the subject and to find a better way of presenting this material in textbooks and courses.

In section 2, I give a quick introduction to classical Dirac field theory and then, in section 3, I present a standard textbook-style approach to quantizing the Dirac field—where a number of modifications need to be made during quantization to ensure that the final theory includes positrons and excludes negative energies. In the next section, I explain how we can revise the expressions for energy and charge in classical Dirac field theory (without altering the Dirac equation) so that the field always has positive energy, but can have either positive or negative charge. In the following section, I show that the modifications made during quantization in section 3 are unnecessary if we start with the revised classical Dirac field theory of section 4. The process of quantization becomes simple and straightforward. In section 6, I compare the revised version of classical Dirac field theory to classical electromagnetism and show that it is in closer alignment than the original version of classical Dirac field theory. I do not mention Dirac's idea that space is filled with an infinite sea of negative energy electrons until section 7, where I explain how the revised version of classical Dirac field theory removes any temptation to think in such terms. In this paper, we will view quantum field theory as built from a classical theory of fields, not particles. In section 8, I briefly explore the implications of this picture (where the energy and charge of the electron are spread out) for understanding the self-interaction and spin of a classical electron. We will see that the revised version of classical Dirac field theory from section 4 yields a minimum size for the classical electron, large enough that we can understand the electron's angular momentum and magnetic moment as generated by true rotation (without needing any part of the electron to move faster than the speed of light). In the main text of this article, I treat the classical Dirac field as complex-valued. In appendix A, I discuss the idea of a classical theory where the Dirac field is Grassmann-valued, explaining that such a theory could be used as a stepping stone between a classical theory where the Dirac field is complex-valued and a quantum theory of the Dirac field.

There are two very different approaches to quantum field theory: the particle approach and the field approach. Focusing on the Dirac field, the field approach starts from classical Dirac field theory and then moves via field quantization3 to a quantum theory of the Dirac field. The quantum state of the Dirac field is given by a wave functional4 that assigns amplitudes to possible configurations of the classical Dirac field. The wave functional describes the quantum Dirac field as being in a superposition of different classical states. Studying classical Dirac field theory helps us to better understand the elements of such superpositions. According to the alternative particle approach,5 one starts instead from Dirac's single particle relativistic quantum theory of the electron and then moves to a quantum field theory by extending this single particle theory to multiple particles—permitting superpositions of different numbers of particles.6 In this approach, the quantum state is given by a wave function that assigns amplitudes to possible spatial arrangements of different numbers of point particles. Both the particle and field approaches are pursued in the literature and there is much to be said about why one might prefer either approach over the other, or why one might prefer a different approach entirely. In this paper I focus on understanding and developing the field approach. But, it is not the only option.

Section snippets

Classical Dirac field theory

The process of field quantization starts from a classical theory of the Dirac field. The classical Dirac field is sometimes treated as complex-valued and sometimes as Grassmann-valued. In the main text of this article, I adopt the simpler picture of the classical Dirac field as complex-valued. In appendix A, I discuss the role that a Grassmann-valued classical Dirac field might play in the path from classical to quantum field theory.

Classical Dirac field theory describes the dynamics of the

How the Dirac field has been quantized

With classical Dirac field theory on the table, we can now review a standard way9 of quantizing the Dirac field (along the lines of Peskin & Schroeder, 1995, sec. 3.5; Tong, 2006, ch. 5).10

Revising classical Dirac field theory

In this section and the next, I would like to start from the top and tell a new story where we understand from the beginning that we desire a theory of both electrons and positrons. We begin with a new classical theory of the Dirac field and end with essentially the same quantum theory of the Dirac field. Although the quantum field theory we arrive at will look just the way it did before and the empirical predictions of the theory will be unchanged, this new and more direct route will revise

How the Dirac field should be quantized

Starting with the revised classical Dirac field theory presented in the previous section streamlines the process of quantizing the Dirac field. Moving from classical to quantum field theory, we can write the Dirac field operator in plane wave expansion asψˆi(x)=1(2π)3/2d3p2Eps=12(bˆs(p)uis(p)eipx)ψˆei(x)+1(2π)3/2d3p2Eps=12(dˆs(p)vis(p)eipx)ψˆpi(x).by simply putting hats on the coefficients bs(p) and ds(p) in (20) and viewing them as electron annihilation and positron creation

Comparison to the electromagnetic field

At first glance, the expression for the energy of the electromagnetic field,E=d3x18π(E2+B2),looks very different from either of the two different energies that have been proposed for the classical Dirac field, (3) or (25). However, as we'll see shortly, there is an alternative way of expressing the state of the electromagnetic field that makes the energy of the electromagnetic field look very similar to these. In particular, the signs will match the revised energy of the Dirac field in (17)

Draining the Dirac sea

In contemporary presentations of the quantization of the Dirac field, authors often seek to avoid any mention of Dirac's idea that space is filled with an infinite sea of negative energy electrons. The Dirac sea has been described derisively as a “potentially confusing metaphor” (Zee, 2010, p. 113), “an example of physicists not taking the trouble to rewrite their history” (Weinberg, 1985, p. 120), “an extremely persistent distraction” (Duncan, 2012, p. 39), “a red herring of sinister vitality”

The classical electron

In this paper, we are viewing our quantum field theory of positrons and electrons as built from a classical field theory, not a classical theory of point particles (see section 1). The classical states that we are taking to enter superpositions in our quantum theory are classical field configurations, not arrangements of point particles. From this perspective, what is a classical electron? It is not a point particle, since the classical theory we are starting from is not a theory of point

Conclusion

The Dirac field is sometimes called “the electron-positron field.” But, in the ordinary approach to quantizing the Dirac field, positrons only enter after the classical Dirac field has been quantized. In this paper, I have presented a new approach to quantizing the Dirac field in which we start from the beginning with a classical field theory of electrons and positrons. In this theory, the classical Dirac field can be decomposed into separate electron and positron fields—where the former has

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Sean Carroll, Dustin Lazarovici, David Wallace, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful feedback and discussion. Special thanks to Jacob Barandes for pointing out an important problem in an earlier draft.

References (64)

  • D. Bohm et al.

    An ontological basis for the quantum theory

    Physics Reports

    (1987)
  • C.T. Sebens

    How electrons spin

    Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

    (2019)
  • D. Wallace

    QFT, antimatter, and symmetry

    Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

    (2009)
  • F. Arntzenius et al.

    Time reversal in classical electromagnetism

    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

    (2009)
  • D. Bailin et al.

    Introduction to gauge field theory

    (1993)
  • D. Baker

    Against field interpretations of quantum field theory

    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

    (2009)
  • D.J. Baker et al.

    Antimatter

    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

    (2010)
  • F.A. Berezin

    The method of second quantization

    (1966)
  • J.D. Bjorken et al.

    Relativistic quantum mechanics

    (1964)
  • J.D. Bjorken et al.

    Relativistic quantum fields

    (1965)
  • D. Bohm et al.

    The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory

    (1993)
  • R. Casalbuoni

    On the quantization of systems with anticommuting variables

    Il Nuovo Cimento

    (1976)
  • C.-P. Chuu et al.

    Wave-packet view of the Dirac electron

    (2007)
  • D.-A. Deckert et al.

    A persistent particle ontology for quantum field theory in terms of the Dirac sea

    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

    (2019)
  • B. DeWitt

    Supermanifolds

    (1992)
  • A. Duncan

    The conceptual framework of quantum field theory

    (2012)
  • P.G.O. Freund

    Introduction to supersymmetry

    (1986)
  • M. Frisch

    Inconsistency, asymmetry, and non-locality: A philosophical investigation of classical electrodynamics

    (2005)
  • R.H. Good

    Particle aspect of the electromagnetic field equations

    Physical Review

    (1957)
  • W. Greiner et al.

    Field quantization

    (1996)
  • D.J. Griffiths

    Introduction to quantum mechanics

    (2005)
  • Hartenstein, V., & Hubert, M.. Forthcoming. When fields are not degrees of freedom. The British Journal for the...
  • B. Hatfield

    Quantum theory of point particles and strings. Addison-wesley

    Frontiers in Physics

    (1992)
  • W.H. Heitler

    The quantum theory of radiation

    (1954)
  • P. Holland

    The quantum theory of motion

    (1993)
  • N. Huggett

    Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory

    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

    (2000)
  • R. Jackiw

    Schrödinger picture for boson and fermion quantum field theories

  • R. Jackiw

    Analysis on infinite-dimensional manifolds—Schrödinger representation for quantized fields

  • J.D. Jackson

    Classical electrodynamics

    (1999)
  • P.N. Kaloyerou

    An ontological interpretation of boson fields

  • L.D. Landau et al.

    Course of theoretical physics, volume 2: The classical theory of fields

    (1971)
  • M. Lange

    An introduction to the philosophy of physics: Locality, energy, fields, and mass

    (2002)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Absorbing the arrow of electromagnetic radiation

      2023, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
    • Eliminating Electron Self-repulsion

      2023, Foundations of Physics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text