Abstract
While capitalism has proven to be one of the most efficient economic engines in modern history, the goal of simply pursuing profit has, according to many, left some of society’s needs unmet if not further challenged. In 2006, Porter and Kramer developed the notion that corporations could and should pursue a higher goal of capitalism including “creating shared value” (CSV) as a means to improve performance and bridging the gap that developed between corporations and society (Porter and Kramer 2011). The concept was welcomed within both academia and the corporate world for the amount of energy it has generated, its potential to improve capitalism and repair what Brigley referred to as the “fractured contract” (Brigley 1995: 225). However, it is being equally critiqued for lacking in definitional clarity causing inconsistent strategy, and lacking in originality vis-a-vis existing concepts such as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This paper proposes corporate virtue as a form of CSV, by identifying two theories which demonstrate how corporate virtue meets the definitional requirements of CSV and helps both the corporation and society fulfil unmet needs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aristotle, Oswald. M.. 1962. Nicomachean Ethic. Trans. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Beauchamp, T.L., and N.E. Bowie. 2005. Ethical theory and business. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Beschorner, Thomas. 2013. Creating shared value: The one-trick Pony approach. Business Ethics Journal Review 1(17): 106–112.
Brigley, Stephen. 1995. Business ethics in context, researching with case studies. Journal of Business Ethics 14: 219–226.
Conger, J.A. 1998. The necessary art of Persuasion. Harvard Business Review: 85–95.
Constanza, Robert, Brendan Fisher, et al. 2007. Quality of life: An approach opportunities, human needs and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics 61: 267–276.
Crane, A., D. Matten, G. Palazzo, and L. Spence. 2013. Contesting the value of the shared value concept. California Management Review 56(2): 130–153.
Crane, Andrew, Guido Palazzo, Laura J. Spence, and Dirk Matten. 2014. Contesting the value of creating shared value. California Management Review 56(2): 130–153.
Dembek, K., P. Singh, and T. Bhakhoo. 2015. Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics 18(2): 153–190.
Doyal, L., and I. Gough. 1991. A theory of human need. New York: Guilford.
Dubois, Cathy L.Z., and David A. Dubois. 2012. Expanding the vision of industrial- organizational psychology contributions to environmental sustainability. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5(4): 480–483.
Eccles, R.G., S.C. Newquist, and R. Schatz. 2007. Reputation and its risks. Harvard Business Review 85: 104–114.
Fearne, Andrew, Marian Garcia Martinez, and Benjamin Dent. 2012. Dimensions of sustainable value chains: Implications for value chain analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17(6): 575–581.
Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, Milton. 1970. A Friedman doctrine – The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine 13:122–126.
Henderson, D. 2001. Misguided virtue. False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Heugens, P.M., C.B. van Riel, and F.A. van den Bosch. 2004. Reputation management capabilities as decision rules. Journal of Management Studies 41(8): 1349–1374.
Maltz, Elliot, Fred Thompson, and Debra Jones Ringold. 2011. Assessing and maximizing corporate social initiatives: A strategic view of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Affairs 11(4): 344–352.
Mintz, S.M. 1996. Aristotelian virtue and business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics 15(8): 827–838.
Moore, Geoff. 2005a. Humanizing business: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly 15(2): 237–255.
———. 2005b. Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 15(4): 659–685.
Pies, Ingo, Markus Beckman, and Stefan Hielscher. 2014. The political role of the business firm: An Odonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristotelian idea of individual citizenship. Business and Society 52(3): 226–259.
Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89(1/2): 62–77.
Porter, M.E., Greg Hills, et al. 2012. Measuring shared value: How to unlock value by linking social and business results. FSG. http://www.fsg.org/tabid/191/ArticleId/740/Default.aspx ?srpush=true. Accessed 20 Feb 2016.
Robinson, D.N. 2006. Rhetoric and character in aristotle. The Review of Metaphysics 60(1): 3–15.
Shanahan, M.F., and Peter Seele. 2015. Shorting Ethos: Exploring the relationship between Aristotle’s ethos and reputation management. Corporate Reputation Review 18(1): 37–49.
Solomon, R.C. 1992. Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 2(3): 317–339.
———. 2003. Victims of circumstance? A defense of virtue ethics in business. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(1): 43–62.
Spitzeck, Heiko, and Sonja Chapman. 2012. Creating shared value as a differentiation strategy—The example of BASF in Brazil. Corporate Governance 12(4): 499–513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shanahan, F., Seele, P. (2017). Creating Shared Value. Looking at Shared Value Through an Aristotelian Lens. In: Wieland, J. (eds) Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism. Ethical Economy, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48801-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48802-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)