Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peano's axioms in their historical context

  • Published:
Archive for History of Exact Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Bibliography

  • Abrusci, V. Michele. “Peano e Hilbert: G. Peano nelle prime fasi delle ricerche fondazionali di D. Hilbert.” In Peano e i fondamenti della matematica, 185–195.

  • Agassi, Joseph. Towards an Historiography of Science. The Hague: Mouton, 1963; Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan Univ. Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph. “Logic and Logic of,” Poznań Studies 4 (1978): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph. “Presuppositions for Logic.” The Monist 65 (1982): 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aimonetto, Italo. “Il concetto di numero naturale in Frege, Dedekind e Peano.” Filosofia (1969) 20: 579–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archimedes. The Method of Archimedes, Recently Discovered by Heiberg: A Supplement to The Works of Archimedes 1897. Thomas L. Heath, ed. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashurst, Gareth F. Founders of Modern Mathematics. London: Frederick Muller, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspray, William, & Kitcher, Philip, eds. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. Frege: Logical Excavations. New York; Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; Basil Blackwell, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Oskar. Grundlagen der Mathematik: in geschichtlicher Entwicklung. 4th ed. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth Evert W. The Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, George. Works. 9 vols. A. A. Luce & T. E. Jessop, eds. London: Nelson, 1948–1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Max. The Nature of Mathematics: A Critical Survey. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzano, Bernard. Schriften. Vol 1: Functionenlehre, Karel Rychlík, ed. Prague: Königliche Böhmische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzano, Bernard. Rein analytischer Beweis des Lehrsatzes..., Prague, 1814–17. Ostwald's Klassiker no. 153. Leipzig: Engelmann, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzano, Bernard. Paradoxien des Unendlichen. F. Přihonsky, ed. Berlin, 1889.

  • Boole, George. The Mathematical Analysis of Logic. Cambridge, 1847. Reprint. Oxford: Blackwell, 1965.

  • Boole, George. An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. Reprint. New York: Dover, 1958.

  • Borga, Marco. “La logica, il metodo assiomatico e la problematica metateorica”, in Borga, Freguglia & Palladino, I contributi fondazionali della scuola di Peano, pp. 11–75, 1985.

  • Borga, M., Freguglia, P., & Palladino, D. I contributi fondazionali della scuola di Peano. Milan: Franco Angeli, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzini, Umberto. Il calcolo sublime: storia dell'analisi matematica da Euler a Weierstrass. Turin: Boringhieri, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzini, Umberto. The Higher Calculus: A History of Real and Complex Analysis from Euler to Weierstrass. Warren Van Egmond, trans. New York: Springer, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzini, Umberto. “Peano e la logica dei controesempi.” In Peano e i fondamenti della matematica, 237–253.

  • Boyer, Carl B. The History of the Calculus and its Conceptual Development (The Concepts of the Calculus). New York: Dover, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breidert, Wolfgang. George Berkeley. Basel: Birkhäuser, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, Luitzen Egbertus Jan. “Intuitionism and Formalism”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 20 (October 1913–July 1914): 81–96.

  • Brouwer, Luitzen Egbertus Jan. Collected Works. 2 vols. Vol 1: A. Heyting, ed. Vol. 2: Hans Freudenthal, ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1975, 1976.

  • Cajori, Florian. A History of the Conceptions of Limits and Fluxions in Great Britain. Chicago: The Open Court, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajori, Florian. A History of Mathematical Notations. 2 vols. Chicago: The Open Court, 1928–1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassina, Ugo. “L'Opera scientifica di Giuseppe Peano.” Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico di Milano 7 (1933): 323–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassina, Ugo. “L'Oeuvre philosophique de G. Peano.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 40 (1933): 481–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassina, Ugo. “Storia ed analisi del ‘Formulario completo’ di Peano.” Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana 10 (1955): 244–265, 544–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassina, Ugo. “Sul ‘Formulario Matematico’ di Peano,” in Terracini (ed.), In memoria di Giuseppe Peano, pp. 71–102, 1955.

  • Cauchy, Augustin. Oeuvres complètes d'Augustin Cauchy. Series 1, 12 vols., series 2, 15 vols. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1882-.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celebrazioni in memoria di Giuseppe Peano nel cinquantenario della morte. Atti del Convegno organizzato dal Dipartimento di Matematica dell'Università di Torino, 27–28 ottobre 1982. Turin, 1982.

  • Cellucci, Carlo, “Gli scopi della logica matematica.” in Peano e i Fondamenti della Matematica: 73–138.

  • Cohen, I. Bernard. Introduction to Newton's ‘Principia’. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couturat, Louis. “La logique mathématique de M. Peano.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 7 (1899): 616–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couturat, Louis. La logique de Leibniz. Paris, 1901. Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms, 1969.

  • Crowe, Michael J. A History of Vector Analysis. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Philip, J., & Hersh, Reuben. The Mathematical Experience. Penguin Books 1990.

  • Dedekind, Richard. Gesammelte mathematische Werke. 3 vols. Robert Fricke, Emmy Noether & Öystein Ore, eds. Braunschweig: Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, 1930–1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedekind, Richard. Essays on the Theory of Numbers. Wooster Woodruff Beman, trans. New York: Dover Publications, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Charles Coulston Gillispie, ed. 18 vols. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1970–1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieudonné, Jean A. “The Work of Nicholas Bourbaki.” The American Mathematical Monthly 77 (1970): 134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugac, Pierre, “Eléments d'analyse de Karl Weierstrass.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 10 (1973): 41–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael. The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Charles Henry. The Historical Development of the Calculus. New York: Springer, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, Leonhard. Opera omnia, 3 series. Leipzig, Berlin, Zurich, etc.: Teubner, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauvel, John, & Gray, Jeremy, eds. The History of Mathematics: A Reader. London: MacMillan, Milton Keynes: The Open University 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourier, Joseph. Oeuvres de Fourier. 2 vols. Gaston Darboux, ed. Paris, 1888–1890.

  • Fourier, Joseph. The Analytical Theory of Heat. Alexandre Freeman, trans. New York: Dover, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, Abraham A., Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, & Levy, Azriel. Foundations of Set Theory. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle, 1879. Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms, 1964.

  • Frege, Gottlob. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Jena, 1893. Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms, 1962.

  • Frege, Gottlob. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau, 1884.

  • Frege, Gottlob. The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number. J. L. Austin, trans. Oxford: Blackwell, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freguglia, Paolo, “La logica matematica di Peano: un'analisi,” Physis, 23 (1981): 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, Hans. “Die Grundlagen der Geometrie um die Wende des 19. Jahrhunderts.” Mathematisch-Physikalische Semester berichte 7 (1960): 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, Hans. “The Main Trends in the Foundations of Geometry in the 19th Century.” In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, edited by E. Nagel, P. Suppes & A. Tarski, 613–621. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galuzzi, Massimo. “Geometria algebrica e logica tra Otto e Novecento.” In Gianni Micheli (ed.) Storia d'Italia. Annali 3. Storia e tecnica nella cultura e nella società dal Rinascimento a oggi. Turin: Einaudi, 1980, pp. 1004–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke, Helmuth. Geschichte des Zahlbegriffs. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, Donald A. Frege, Dedekind, and Peano on the Foundations of Arithmetic. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, Donald A, ed. Revolutions in Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusti, Enrico. “Gli “errori” di Cauchy e i fondamenti dell'analisi.” Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche 4, fasc. 2 (1984): 24–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabiner, Judith V. “Is Mathematical Truth Time-Dependent?” The American Mathematical Monthly 81 (1974): 354–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabiner, Judith V. The Origins of Cauchy's Rigorous Calculus. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabiner, Judith V. “Changing Attitudes toward Mathematical Rigor: Lagrange and Analysis in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” In H. N. Jahnke & M. Otte, eds. Epistemological and Social Problems of the Sciences in the Early Nineteenth Century (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981), pp. 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassmann, Hermann. Gesammelte mathematische und physikalische Werke. 3 vols. S. Study, G. Scheffers & F. Engel, eds. Leipzig: Teubner, 1894–1911. Reprint. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassmann, Robert. Die Formenlehre oder Mathematik. Stettin, 1872. Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. The Development of the Foundations of Mathematical Analysis from Euler to Riemann. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. “From Weierstrass to Russell: A Peano Medley.” Rivista di storia della scienza, 2 (1) (1985): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. “Living Together and Living Apart. On the Interactions between Mathematics and Logics from the French Revolution to the First World War.” S. Afr. J. Philos. 7 (2), (1988): 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. “Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) After Twenty Years.” Notes Rec. R. Soc. Lond. (1990) 44: 280–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. ed. Joseph Fourier: 1768–1830. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. ed. From the Calculus to Set Theory: 1630–1919. London: Duckworth, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guicciardini, Niccolò. The Development of Newtonian Calculus in Britain, 1700–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijenoort, Jean Van, ed. From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, David. Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig, 1899.

  • Hilbert, David. The Foundations of Geometry. E. J. Townsend, trans. La Salle: The Open Court, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, David. Gesammelte Abhandlungen. 3 vols. Berlin, 1932–1935. Reprint. New York: Chelsea, 1965.

  • Hilbert, David. “Über den Zahlbegriff.” Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung (1900) 8: 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, David. “Mathematical Problems”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 8 (October 1901–July 1902): 437–479.

  • Hilbert, David. “Probleme der Grundlegung der Mathematik”. Atti del Congresso Internazionale dei Matematici, Bologna 3–10 Settembre 1928, Vol. 1. Bologna: Zanichelli, 1929. Pp. 135–141.

  • Hilbert, David. Ricerche sui fondamenti della matematica. V. Michele Abrusci, ed. Naples: Bibliopolis, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Giorgio. “‘Rigore’ ed ‘assiomatica’ nella matematica moderna.” Scienza e storia: analisi critica e problemi attuali. Rome: Editori Riuniti, 1980. Pp. 427–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Giorgio. “‘Rigor’ and ‘Axiomatica’ in Modern Mathematics.” Fundamenta Scientiae 2 (1981): 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, Stanley W. The Principles of Science: a Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method. London, 1874, 1877, 1879. Reprint. New York: Dover, 1958.

  • Jevons, Stanley W. Pure Logic and Other Minor Works. London, 1980. Robert Adamson, ed. New York: Franklin, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdain, Philip E. B. “The Development of the Theories of Mathematical Logic and the Principles of Mathematics.” The Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 41 (1910): 324–352; 43 (1912): 219–314; 44 (1913): 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Hubert C. “The Mathematical Philosophy of Giuseppe Peano.” Philosophy of Science 30 (1963): 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Hubert C. “Giuseppe Peano at the University of Turin.” The Mathematics Teacher 61 (November 1968): 703–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Hubert C. “The Origins of Modern Axiomatics: Pasch to Peano.” The American Mathematical Monthly 79 (1972): 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Hubert C. “Peano's Concept of Number.” Historia Mathematica 1 (1974): 387–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Hubert C. “Nine Letters from Giuseppe Peano to Bertrand Russell.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 205–220, p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Hubert C. Peano: Life and Works of Giuseppe Peano. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Hubert C. Peano: Storia di un matematico. Paolo Pagli, trans. Turin: Boringhieri, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip. “Mathematical Rigor — Who Needs It?” Noûs 15 (March 1981): 469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip. “The Foundations of Mathematics.” In Companion to the History of Modern Science, edited by R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie & M. J. S. Hodge, 677–689. London: Routledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, Stephen Cole. Introduction to Metamathematics. New York / Amsterdam / Groningen: Van Nostrand / North-Holland / P. Noordhoff, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Morris. Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. New York: Oxford University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Morris. Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch, Eberhard. “Einfluß der Symbolik und des Formalismus auf die Entwicklung des mathematischen Denkens.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 3 (1980): 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronecker, Leopold. Werke. 5 vols. Kurt Hensel, ed. Reprint. New York: Chelsea, 1968.

  • Lagrange, Joseph Louis. Oeuvres. 14 vols. J.-A. Serret & G. Darboux, eds. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1867–1892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre. “Cauchy and the Continuum: the Significance of Non-Standard Analysis for the History and Philosophy of Mathematics”. in John Worrall & Gregory Currie, eds., Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. Pp. 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Mathematische Schriften. 7 vols. C. I. Gerhardt, ed. Berlin 1849–1864. Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms, 1961–1962.

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Opuscules et fragments inédits. Louis Couturat, ed. Paris, 1903. Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms, 1961.

  • Levi, Beppo. “L'opera matematica di Giuseppe Peano.” Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana, 11 (1932): 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Beppo. “Intorno alle vedute di G. Peano circa la logica matematica.” Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana 12 (1933): 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclaurin, Colin. A Treatise of Fluxions. Edinburgh, 1742.

  • Mehrtens, Herbert. “Anschauungswelt versus Papierwelt — Zur historischen Interpretation der Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik.” In H. Poser & H.-W. Schütt (eds.) Ontologie und Wissenschaft. Berlin: TU-Berlin, 1984, pp. 231–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrtens, Herbert. Moderne Sprache Mathematik. Eine Geschichte des Streits um die Grundlagen der Disziplin und des Subjekts formaler Systeme. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrtens, H., Bos, H., & Schneider, I. Social History of Nineteenth Century Mathematics. Boston: Birkhäuser, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Ernst, & Newman, James R. Gödel's Proof. New York: University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. London, 1687.

  • Newton, Isaac. Mathematical Principles. 2 vols. Motte's translation revised by Florian Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoa, Alessandro. “Il contributo di G. Peano all'ideografia logica.” Periodico di Matematiche 13 (January 1933): 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoa, Alessandro. “Ce que la logique doit à Peano.” Actualités scientifiques et industrielles (1936): 31–37.

  • Palladino, Franco. “Le lettere di Giuseppe Peano nella corrispondenza di Ernesto Cesàro.” Nuncius, Anno 8 (1993), fasc. 1, pp. 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peano e i Fondamenti della Matematica. Modena: Mucchi, 1992.

  • Peano, Giuseppe. Opere scelte. 3 vols. Rome: Cremonese, 1957–1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peano, Giuseppe. Selected Works. Hubert C. Kennedy, trans. and ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peano, Giuseppe. Arbeiten zur Analysis und zur mathematischen Logik. Edited by G. Asser. Leipzig: Teubner, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckhaus, Volker. Hilbertprogramm und Kritische Philosophie. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. Collected Papers. Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1931–1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincherle, Salvatore. “Saggio di una introduzione alla teoria delle funzioni analitiche secondo i principii del prof. C. Weierstrass.” Giornale di Matematiche 18 (1880): 178–254, 317–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri. “L'Oeuvre mathématique de Weierstrass.” Acta Mathematica 22 (1899): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri. “Du role de l'intuition et de la logique en mathématiques”. Compte rendu du Deuxième Congrès International des Mathématiciens, edited by E. Duporcq, 115–130. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1902. Reprint. Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri. Oeuvres. 11 vols. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1950–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, Alfred. “Grundlagen der Allgemeinen Funktionenlehre”. Enzyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 2, Part 1, First half: Analysis (Leipzig: Teubner, 1899–1916): 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard van Orman. “Peano as a Logician.” History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (1987): 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Constance. Hilbert. Berlin: Springer, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Abraham. Non-Standard Analysis. Revised edition. Amsterdam: North-Holland; New York: American Elsevier, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Consuegra, Francisco. “Elementos logicistas en la obra de Peano y su escuela.” Mathesis 4 (1988): 221–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Consuegra, Francisco. The Mathematical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell: Origins and Development. Basel: Birkhäuser, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Lalla. “Lo spirito creativo è leggero.” Spirali, Anno. 3 (June 1980), n. 6, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. “Sur la logique des relations, avec des applications à la théorie de séries.” Revue de Mathématiques (Rivista di Matematica) 7 (1900–1901): 115–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1903. 2nd ed. London: Allen & Unwin, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy London: George Allen & Unwin, New York: Macmillan, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. 2 vols. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1967–1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand, & Whitehead, Alfred N. Principia Mathematica. 3 vols. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1910–1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sageng, Erik L. Colin MacLaurin and the Foundations of the Method of Fluxions. Ph.D. dissertation. Princeton University, 1989.

  • Schneider, Ivo. Archimedes: Ingenieur, Naturwissenschaftler und Mathematiker. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Ivo. Isaac Newton. Munich: Beck, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, Michael. In the Wake of Galileo. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, Michael. “Peano, Logicism and Formalism.” In I. C. Jarvie & N. Laor, (eds.) The Enterprise of Critical Rationalism. Festschrift Agassi. Vol. I: Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, forthcoming.

  • Spalt, Detlef D. Vom Mythos der Mathematischen Vernunft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigt, Walter P. van. Brouwer's Intuitionism. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struik, Dirk J. A Concise History of Mathematics. 2 vols. New York: Dover, 1948, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styazhkin, N. I. History of Mathematical Logic from Leibniz to Peano. Cambridge; Mass: MIT Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terracini, Alessandro, ed. In memoria di Giuseppe Peano. Cuneo: Liceo Scientifico Statale, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toepell, Michael-Markus. Über die Entstehung von David Hilberts “Grundlagen der Geometrie”. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toepell, Michael-Markus. “On the Origins of Hilbert's ‘Grundlagen der Geometrie’.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 35 (1986): 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torretti, Robert. Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropfke, Johannes. Geschichte der Elementarmathematik. 4th edition, Vol. 1: Arithmetik und Algebra. Revised by Kurt Vogel, Karin Reich, & Helmuth Gericke. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1980.

  • Vailati, Giovanni, “La logique mathématique et sa nouvelle phase de développement dans les écrits de M. J. Peano.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 7 (1899): 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkert, Klaus T. Die Krise der Anschauung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Hao. “The Axiomatization of Arithmetic”. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 22 (June 1957): 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weierstrass, Karl. Mathematische Werke. 7 vols. Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms, New York: Johnson, 1967.

  • Weyl, Hermann. Gesammelte Abhandlungen. 4 vols. Berlin: Springer, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J. O. “The Analyst Controversy: Berkeley's Influence on the Development of Mathematics.” Hermathena, 54 (1939): 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J. O. “The Analyst Controversy: Berkeley as a Mathematician.” Hermathena, 59 (1942): 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley's Criticism of the Infinitesimal.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4 (May 1953–February 1954): 22–25.

  • Youschkevitch, A. P. “Lazare Carnot and the Competition of the Berlin Academy in 1786 on the Mathematical Theory of the Infinite.” In C. C. Gillispie, Lazare Carnot Savant, 147–168. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften der Universität München, Museumsinsel 1, D-80538, München

    Michael Segre

Authors
  1. Michael Segre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Communicated by Menso Folkerts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segre, M. Peano's axioms in their historical context. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 48, 201–342 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375085

Keywords

Search

Navigation