Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T21:51:19.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Depiction as possible phase in the dynamics of sociomorphing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

Johanna Seibt Open the ORCID record for Johanna Seibt [Opens in a new window]
Johanna Seibt*
Affiliation:
Research Unit for Robophilosophy and Integrative Social Robotics, Aarhus University, Beder 8330, Denmark filseibt@cas.au.dk www.robophilosophy.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The depiction model presents a major advance in our theoretical conceptualization of how humans experience and understand social robots. But the scope of the model is, I suggest, more limited: It pertains to one possible phase in a more comprehensive cognitive-practical dynamics of sense-making (“sociomorphing”) as conceptualized in the OASIS framework. According to the OASIS framework, some basic social actions can be realized by robots, while others may be depicted in the way described by the model.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e45
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barak, A. K., Alves-Oliveira, P., & Ribeiro, T. (2020). An extended framework for characterizing social robots. In Jost, C., Pedevic, B. & Grandgeorge, M. (Eds.), Methods in human–robot interaction research (pp. 21–64). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onnasch, L., & Roesler, E. (2021). A taxonomy to structure and analyze human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(4), 833–849. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00666-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, J. (2018). Classifying forms and modes of co-working in the ontology of asymmetric social interactions (OASIS). In Coeckelbergh, M., Loh, J., Funk, M., Seibt, J. & Nørskov, M. (Eds.), Envisioning robots in society – Proceedings of robophilosophy 2018 (pp. 134–146). IOS Press.Google Scholar
Seibt, J., Vestergaard, C., & Damholdt, M. F. (2020). Sociomorphing, not anthropomorphizing: Towards a typology of experienced sociality. In Nørskov, M., Seibt, J., Quick, O. (Eds.), Culturally sustainable social robotics – Proceedings of robophilosophy 2020 (pp. 51–67). IOS Press.Google Scholar
Zebrowski, R. L., & McGraw, E. B. (2022). Carving up participation: Sense-making and sociomorphing for artificial minds. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 16, 815850. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.815850. PMID: 35774354; PMCID: PMC9239697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed